Re: [OMPI users] [External] Re: MPI is still dominantparadigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Oddo Da via users
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:51 AM Prentice Bisbal via users < users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > If you want to continue this conversation in a more appropriate forum, may > I recommend the Beowulf mailing list? Discussing *anything* HPC-related is > fair game there. It's a low-volume list, but the

Re: [OMPI users] MPI is still dominantparadigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Oddo Da via users
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:41 AM Gilles Gouaillardet via users < users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > The Java bindings support "recent" JDK, and if you face an issue, please > report a bug (either here or on github) Starting with Java 8, the language went into a much different direction - function

Re: [OMPI users] MPI is still dominant paradigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Oddo Da via users
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:21 AM Gus Correa via users < users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > "The reports of MPI death are greatly exaggerated." [Mark Twain] > > And so are the reports of Fortran death > (despite the efforts of many CS departments > to make their students Fortran- and C-illiterate).

Re: [OMPI users] [External] Re: MPI is still dominantparadigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Prentice Bisbal via users
If you want to continue this conversation in a more appropriate forum, may I recommend the Beowulf mailing list? Discussing *anything* HPC-related is fair game there. It's a low-volume list, but the conversation can get quite lively sometimes. https://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf

Re: [OMPI users] MPI is still dominantparadigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet via users
The goal of Open MPI is to provide a high quality of the MPI standard, and the goal of this mailing list is to discuss Open MPI (and not the MPI standard) The Java bindings support "recent" JDK, and if you face an issue, please report a bug (either here or on github) Cheers, Gilles --

Re: [OMPI users] MPI is still dominant paradigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Gus Correa via users
"The reports of MPI death are greatly exaggerated." [Mark Twain] And so are the reports of Fortran death (despite the efforts of many CS departments to make their students Fortran- and C-illiterate). IMHO the level of abstraction of MPI is adequate, and actually very well designed. Higher levels

Re: [OMPI users] MPI is still dominant paradigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Ralph Castain via users
The Java bindings were added specifically to support the Spark/Hadoop communities, so I see no reason why you couldn't use them for Akka or whatever. Note that there are also Python wrappers for MPI at mpi4py that you could build upon. There is plenty of evidence out there for a general migrati

[OMPI users] MPI is still dominant paradigm?

2020-08-07 Thread Oddo Da via users
Hello, This may be a bit of a longer post and I am not sure if it is even appropriate here but I figured I ask. There are no hidden agendas in it, so please treat it as "asking for opinions/advice", as opposed to judging or provoking. For the period between 2010 to 2017 I used to work in (buzzwor

Re: [OMPI users] Books/resources to learn (open)MPI from

2020-08-07 Thread Oddo Da via users
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:46 AM Bennet Fauber via users < users@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > It covers a good deal more than MPI, but there is at least one full > chapter on MPI in > > Scientific Programming and Computer Architecture, Divakar > Viswanath (MIT Press, 2017) > > also available onl