Jeff,
i guess i was referring to
https://mail-archive.com/users@lists.open-mpi.org/msg29818.html
that was reported and fixed in August 2016, so the current issue is
likely unrelated.
Since you opened a github issue for that, let's all follow-up at
https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/
On Jan 23, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
>
> There used to be a bug in the IOF part, but I am pretty sure this has already
> been fixed.
Gilles: can you cite what you're talking about?
Edgar was testing on master, so if there was some kind of IOF fix, I would
assume that it wo
I ran all my tests with gcc 6.4
Thanks
Edgar
On 1/23/2018 7:40 AM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
Gilles,
I have not tried compiling the latest openmpi with GCC. I am waiting
to see how the intel version turns out before attempting GCC.
Cheers,
Vahid
On Jan 23, 2018, at 9:33 AM, Gilles Gouailla
Fair enough,
To be on the safe side, I encourage you to use the latest Intel compilers
Cheers,
Gilles
Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>Gilles,
>
>
>I have not tried compiling the latest openmpi with GCC. I am waiting to see
>how the intel version turns out before attempting GCC.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Vah
Gilles,
I have not tried compiling the latest openmpi with GCC. I am waiting to see how
the intel version turns out before attempting GCC.
Cheers,
Vahid
On Jan 23, 2018, at 9:33 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
mailto:gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Vahid,
There used to be a bug in the IOF pa
Vahid,
There used to be a bug in the IOF part, but I am pretty sure this has already
been fixed.
Does the issue also occur with GNU compilers ?
There used to be an issue with Intel Fortran runtime (short read/write were
silently ignored) and that was also fixed some time ago.
Cheers,
Gilles
This would work for Quantum Espresso input. I am waiting to see what happens to
EPW. I don’t think EPW accepts the -i argument. I will report back once the EPW
job is done.
Cheers,
Vahid
On Jan 22, 2018, at 6:05 PM, Edgar Gabriel
mailto:egabr...@central.uh.edu>> wrote:
well, my final commen
