Siegmar,
that looks like a libtool issue : "-z noexecstack" is not correctly
passed to cc
a simple workaround is to append "-Wl,-z -Wl,noexecstack" to your LDFLAGS
(and do not pass "-z noexecstack" to LDFLAGS nor CFLAGS)
Cheers,
Gilles
On 1/19/2016 11:19 PM, Siegmar Gross wrote:
Hi Gilles,
You may wish to subscribe to https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/157.
Jeff
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Udayanga Wickramasinghe <
uswic...@umail.iu.edu> wrote:
> Hi devs,
> I am using THREAD_MULTIPLE in openmpi version 1.8.4. However I
> occasionally see following warning and my applicat
Hi devs,
I am using THREAD_MULTIPLE in openmpi version 1.8.4. However I occasionally
see following warning and my application gets hanged up intermittently.
Does this mean thread multiple mode is not supported in 1.8.4 ? Or does
openmpi has a version that fully supports this ?
opal_libevent2021_ev
Sorry for the delay - I have tracked this down and fixed it. The fix will be
included in 1.10.2.
Thanks for bringing it to our attention!
Ralph
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:38 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>
> A singleton will indeed have an extra thread, but it should be quiescent.
> I’ll check the 1.
HI Ibrahim,
Are you using a 32bit or 64bit JVM?
I don't think this is an Open MPI issue, but likely something owing to your
app or your java setup.
You may want to checkout
http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/2012/09/outofmemoryerror-unable-to-create-new.html
If you'd like to post the jav
Hallo,
I'm working with java OpenMPI on a server with 64GB memory. But when I run the
java class I can only run it on until 15 processes (with this command: mpirun
-np 15 java Multiplikation). Although there is 64GB memory, only about 3 GB
will be used(with top command can I see that, the fir
Hi Gilles,
we have installed "execstack", but it doesn't work as expected.
loki lib64 110 execstack -c libmpi_java.so.1.2.0
execstack: libmpi_java.so.1.2.0: Unknown debugging section .debug_funcnames
loki lib64 111
We've also tried to build it with "cc" instead of "gcc", but it
failed, because