On Mar 14, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On 3/14/2014 5:42 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Why not skip some of these problems and configure OMPI
>> --enable-orterun-prefix-by-default?
> Cool. Thanks for the pointer. If MPI is compiled with that option, can it
> be overridden by the com
On 3/14/2014 5:42 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Why not skip some of these problems and configure OMPI
--enable-orterun-prefix-by-default?
Cool. Thanks for the pointer. If MPI is compiled with that option, can
it be overridden by the command line?
That is, will orterun --prefix /a/b cause /a/b or
Why not skip some of these problems and configure OMPI
--enable-orterun-prefix-by-default?
On Mar 14, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I used this script to launch mpi:
>
> R_PROFILE_USER=~/KHC/sunbelt/Rmpiprofile
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ross/install/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> PATH=/home/
I used this script to launch mpi:
R_PROFILE_USER=~/KHC/sunbelt/Rmpiprofile
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/ross/install/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
PATH=/home/ross/install/bin:/home/ross/install/lib64/R/bin:$PATH orterun -x
R_PROFILE_USER -x LD_LIBRARY_PATH \
-x PATH -hostfile ~/KHC/sunbelt/hosts -np 18 R --n
This is really great news!! I'll test the trunk on our cluster.
Thank you,
Saliya
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> We just fixed the segv (see
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31073, if you care).
>
> The issue was an errant large array on the sta
We just fixed the segv (see https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/31073,
if you care).
The issue was an errant large array on the stack in debug builds, which would
cause JVMs to run out of stack space.
The fix is on the SVN trunk now; it will be on the v1.7 branch shortly.
On Mar 11,
Think I got this fixed on the trunk - see
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4393
On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:51 PM, tmish...@jcity.maeda.co.jp wrote:
>
>
> I happened to misspell a hostname, then it hanged.
>
> [mishima@manage ~]$ mpirun -np 6 -host node05,nod06
> ~/mis/openmpi/demos/mypro
On Mar 14, 2014, at 10:11 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> 1. If specified '--mca btl tcp,self', which interface application will run
>> on, use GigE adaper OR use the OpenFabrics interface in IP over IB mode
>> (just like a high performance GigE adapter) ?
>
> Both - ip over ib looks just like
On Mar 14, 2014, at 6:50 AM, Jianyu Liu wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> 1. If specified '--mca btl tcp,self', which interface application will run
> on, use GigE adaper OR use the OpenFabrics interface in IP over IB mode
> (just like a high performance GigE adapter) ?
Both - ip over ib look
Dear Sir/Madam,
1. If specified '--mca btl tcp,self', which interface application will run
on, use GigE adaper OR use the OpenFabrics interface in IP over IB mode (just
like a high performance GigE adapter) ?
2. If '--mca btl tcp,self' forced application to use GigE adapter, how to
forc
10 matches
Mail list logo
