"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> Yes, I can explain what's going on here. The short version is that a
> change was made with the intent to provide maximum Fortran code
> safety, but with a possible backwards compatibility issue. If this
> change is causing real problems, we can probably chan
On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:09 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> - the old tiny/small/medium-based interface for compilers that do not support
> "ignore TKR" pragmas (i.e., gfortran)
And of course, as soon as I say this publicly, I see a post from Tobias
reminding me that gcc/gfortran 4.9 will include their
Yes, I can explain what's going on here. The short version is that a change
was made with the intent to provide maximum Fortran code safety, but with a
possible backwards compatibility issue. If this change is causing real
problems, we can probably change this, but I'd like a little feedback f
