The reply chains have become intermingled, and there seems to be a lot of
confusion on exactly what is being asked and what answers have already been
provided. I'm sorry -- I'm unable to follow exactly where we are in this
question.
Can you start a single new thread with an explicit descriptio
Won't OMPI still automatically pick up env variables that are named beginning
with "OMPI_"?
On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> It would have to be done via MPI_Info arguments, and we never had a request
> to do so (and hence, don't define such an argument). It would be easy e
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Dave Love wrote:
>
>> This doesn't seem to have been fixed, and I think it's going to bite
>> here. Is this the right change?
>
> Thanks for reminding us.
>
>> --- openmpi-1.6.5/ompi/config/ompi_setup_mpi_fortran.m4~ 2012-04-
It would have to be done via MPI_Info arguments, and we never had a request
to do so (and hence, don't define such an argument). It would be easy
enough to do so (look in the ompi/mca/dpm/orte/dpm_orte.c code).
MPI implementations generally don't forcibly propagate envars because it is
so hard to
