Much appreciated, guys. I am a middle man in a discussion over whether MPI
should be handled by apps people or system people and there was some confusion
when we saw RHEL6 had an RPM for OpenMpi. Your comments make it clear that
there is a pretty strong preference to build OpenMpi on the syste
On 5/25/2013 8:26 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
On May 23, 2013, at 9:50 AM, "Blosch, Edwin L" wrote:
Excellent. Now I've read the FAQ and noticed that it doesn't mention the issue
with the Fortran 90 .mod signatures. Our applications are Fortran. So your
replies are very helpful --
On May 23, 2013, at 9:50 AM, "Blosch, Edwin L" wrote:
> Excellent. Now I've read the FAQ and noticed that it doesn't mention the
> issue with the Fortran 90 .mod signatures. Our applications are Fortran. So
> your replies are very helpful -- now I know it really isn't practical for us
> to
