Oy; that's weird.
I'm afraid we're going to have to wait for Ralph to answer why that is
happening -- sorry!
On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:45 PM, wrote:
>
>
> Hi Correa and Jeff,
>
> Thank you for your comments. I quickly checked your suggestion.
>
> As a result, my simple example case worked wel
Hi Correa and Jeff,
Thank you for your comments. I quickly checked your suggestion.
As a result, my simple example case worked well.
export OMP_NUM_THREADS=4
mpiexec -bynode -np 2 ./my_program && #PBS -l nodes=2:ppn=4
But, practical case that more than 1 process was allocated to a node lik
Dear Sir or Madam,
(We apologize if you receive multiple copies of this message)
Recent Advances in Message Passing Interface. 20th European MPI Users' Group
Meeting (EuroMPI 2013)
EuroMPI 2013 is being held in cooperation with SIG
Brian --
While I was on a plane today, I took a whack at making OMPI behave better when
you forget to MPI_File_close() a file. Can you try this patch (should apply
cleanly to OMPI trunk, v1.6, or v1.7):
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/changeset/28177
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Jef
I'm back online - here's the URL you need to see the required versions of
autotools to build from a Subversion checkout:
http://www.open-mpi.org/svn/building.php
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
wrote:
> Did you build from a Subversion checkout, and therefore run aut
If a user gives an invalid value for the opal_signal MCA parameter, such
as in the command:
mpirun -mca opal_signal x /bin/ls
the error produced by Open MPI 1.6.3 is:
--
It looks like opal_init failed for some reason; your
Did you build from a Subversion checkout, and therefore run autogen.pl?
If so, it sounds like you need to upgrade your version of the autotools -- you
might be using a libtool package (and therefore libltdl) that is too old.
See the autotools page on the OMPI web site (sorry, I'm not connected r
I *believe* that this means that you didn't MPI_File_close a file.
We're not giving a very helpful error message here (it's downright misleading,
actually), but I'm pretty sure that this is the case.
On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:28 AM, "Smith, Brian E." wrote:
> HI all,
>
> I have some code that us
On Mar 17, 2013, at 10:55 PM, Gustavo Correa wrote:
> In your example, have you tried not to modify the node file,
> launch two mpi processes with mpiexec, and request a "-bynode" distribution
> of processes:
>
> mpiexec -bynode -np 2 ./my_program
This should work in 1.7, too (I use these kin
