On Mar 14, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Reuti wrote:
> Am 14.03.2012 um 23:48 schrieb Joshua Baker-LePain:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 at 6:31pm, Reuti wrote
>>
>>> I just tested with two different queues on two machines and a small
>>> mpihello and it is working as expected.
>>
>> At this point the narrat
Am 14.03.2012 um 23:48 schrieb Joshua Baker-LePain:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 at 6:31pm, Reuti wrote
>
>> I just tested with two different queues on two machines and a small mpihello
>> and it is working as expected.
>
> At this point the narrative is getting very confused, even for me. So I
> tr
Something is very wrong - there can only be one orted on each node. Having two
orteds on the same node for the same job guarantees that things will become
confused and generally fail.
I don't know enough SGE to advise you what's wrong with your job script, but it
looks like OMPI thinks there ar
Am 14.03.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Joshua Baker-LePain:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 at 9:33am, Reuti wrote
>
>>> I can run as many threads as I like on a single system with no problems,
>>> even if those threads are running at different nice levels.
>>
>> How do they get different nice levels - you renic
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 at 6:31pm, Reuti wrote
I just tested with two different queues on two machines and a small
mpihello and it is working as expected.
At this point the narrative is getting very confused, even for me. So I
tried to find a clear cut case where I can change one thing to flip
On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Patrik Jonsson wrote:
> I think I tracked it down, though. The problem was in the boost.mpi
> [snip]
Yuck! Glad you tracked it down.
> I do have a more general question, though: Is there a good way to back
> out the location of the request object if I stop deep in t
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jeffrey Squyres wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Patrik Jonsson wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to track down a spurious segmentation fault that I'm
>> getting with my MPI application. I tried using valgrind, and after
>> suppressing the 25,000 errors in PMPI_Init_thre
On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Patrik Jonsson wrote:
> I'm trying to track down a spurious segmentation fault that I'm
> getting with my MPI application. I tried using valgrind, and after
> suppressing the 25,000 errors in PMPI_Init_thread and associated
> Init/Finalize functions,
I haven't looked
Am 14.03.2012 um 17:44 schrieb Ralph Castain:
> Hi Reuti
>
> I appreciate your help on this thread - I confess I'm puzzled by it. As you
> know, OMPI doesn't use SGE to launch the individual processes, nor does SGE
> even know they exist. All SGE is used for is to launch the OMPI daemons
> (or
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 at 9:33am, Reuti wrote
I can run as many threads as I like on a single system with no
problems, even if those threads are running at different nice levels.
How do they get different nice levels - you renice them? I would assume
that all start at the same of the parent. In
Hi Reuti
I appreciate your help on this thread - I confess I'm puzzled by it. As you
know, OMPI doesn't use SGE to launch the individual processes, nor does SGE
even know they exist. All SGE is used for is to launch the OMPI daemons
(orteds). This is done as a single qrsh call, so won't all the
Hi,
I'm trying to track down a spurious segmentation fault that I'm
getting with my MPI application. I tried using valgrind, and after
suppressing the 25,000 errors in PMPI_Init_thread and associated
Init/Finalize functions, I'm left with an uninitialized write in
PMPI_Isend (which I saw is not un
>
> Can anyone tell me whether it is legal to pass zero values for some of the
> send count elements in an MPI_AlltoallV() call? I want to perform an
> all-to-all operation but for performance reasons do not want to send data to
> various ranks who don't need to receive any useful values. If it
Thanks guys for the advice. I had initially compiled my code with the PGI
compiler which actually returned a large, non-zero, non-negative output, which
is why I thought it was valid to use it directly in my code. I'll make sure to
use the correct procedure now for querying that 'attribute'.
Be
George is correct. Try this:
[5:21] svbu-mpi:~/mpi % cat tag-ub.f90
program mpitag
use mpi
implicit none
integer :: err
integer (KIND=MPI_ADDRESS_KIND) :: my_tag_ub
logical flag
call MPI_INIT(err)
call MPI_COMM_GET_ATTR(MPI_COMM_WORLD, MPI_TAG_UB, my_tag
Hi,
Am 14.03.2012 um 04:02 schrieb Joshua Baker-LePain:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 at 5:31pm, Ralph Castain wrote
>
>> FWIW: I have a Centos6 system myself, and I have no problems running OMPI on
>> it (1.4 or 1.5). I can try building it the same way you do and see what
>> happens.
>
> I can run a
16 matches
Mail list logo
