Afraid I'm no OpenSSH expert, but it sounds like there is an issue with its
configuration. Check out the OpenSSH config options to see if something fits.
I did a quick search and found this, as an example:
http://mah.everybody.org/docs/ssh
Note the need to run ssh-agent to cache login credentia
James,
There is no mention about username or password in OMPI. I guess one of the
applications used in the process, either the ssh or the ipconfig.exe is missing
the current context to be executed without a higher level of credentials.
Can you execute ipconfig.exe once connected through ssh wit
On Feb 4, 2012, at 17:57 , Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Has it been possible to build O-MPI for Windows (with perhaps reduced
>> capabilities) to use ssh under Cygwin rather than WMI? We are only after a
>> small subset of MPI functionality.
You should be able to build Open MPI on Windows either un
Hi all,
I am trying to setup Open-MPI across two Windows 7 machines with UAC
disabled ..
Cygwin with OpenSSH is installed, and I can successfully ssh to each machine
without entry of username and password:
JimT@JimT-PC ~
$ ssh NanoOneQuad
Last login: Tue Feb 7 01:42:02 2012 from jimt-pc
Am 06.02.2012 um 22:28 schrieb Tom Bryan:
> On 2/6/12 8:14 AM, "Reuti" wrote:
>
>>> If I need MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, and openmpi is compiled with thread support,
>>> it's not clear to me whether MPI::Init_Thread() and
>>> MPI::Inint_Thread(MPI::THREAD_MULTIPLE) would give me the same behavior from
On 2/6/12 8:14 AM, "Reuti" wrote:
>> If I need MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE, and openmpi is compiled with thread support,
>> it's not clear to me whether MPI::Init_Thread() and
>> MPI::Inint_Thread(MPI::THREAD_MULTIPLE) would give me the same behavior from
>> Open MPI.
>
> If you need thread support, you
Tom/All,
In case it is not already obvious, the GPFS Linux kernel module
takes care of the interaction between the Linux IO stack, POSIX
and the GPFS under layer. MPI-IO interacts with the thusly modified
kernel through the POSIX API.
Another item that is perhaps slightly off topic, but is some
Rob
Thanks, these are the kind of suggestions I was looking for. I will try
them. But I will have to twist some arms to get the 1.5 upgrade. I
might just install a private copy for my tests.
T. Rosmond
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 10:21 -0600, Rob Latham wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:46:21AM
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 10:46:21AM -0800, Tom Rosmond wrote:
> With all of this, here is my MPI related question. I recently added an
> option to use MPI-IO to do the heavy IO lifting in our applications. I
> would like to know what the relative importance of the dedicated MPI
> network vis-a-vis
P.S. I have tested with OpenMPI 1.4.5rc4 and the problem is still there.
Evgeniy
Am 04.02.2012 um 00:15 schrieb Tom Bryan:
> OK. I misunderstood you. I thought that you were saying that spawn_multiple
> had to call mpiexec for each spawned process. If you just meant that mpi.sh
> should launch the initial process with mpiexec, that seems reasonable. I
> tried it with and wi
This is a known problem and is unlikely to be fixed. The solution is simply to
use the medium size f90 module, which means you won't have strict type checking
on all MPI functions that take 2 choice buffers (e.g., MPI_SCATTERV).
In the OMPI v1.7 series, we have a wholly revamped set of Fortran
12 matches
Mail list logo