Re: [OMPI users] Does MPI_Finalize() behaves like MPI_Barrier() ?

2011-08-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
When you MPI_COMM_SPAWN, the parent and children processes are said to be "connected". And MPI_FINALIZE is collective across all connected processes (see the definition of MPI_FINALIZE in MPI-2.2). If you want to disconnect the spawned children from the parents, use MPI_COMM_DISCONNECT. Then

[OMPI users] Does MPI_Finalize() behaves like MPI_Barrier() ?

2011-08-31 Thread Mateus Augusto
Hello, Traduzir do: português Digite um texto ou endereço de um site ou traduza um documento. Cancelar Tradução do português para inglês I have three processes that communicate with each other. The first process creates the other two processes (using MPI_Comm_spaw (...)). When one of the proc

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Shiqing Fan
On 2011-08-31 7:26 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gus Correa wrote: Hmmm ... maybe it was a mix of both? From the very pen ... er ... keyboard (I-phone?, tablet?) of Jeff Squyres: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2010/10/14463.php Good searching! No, my dim

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Gus Correa wrote: > Hmmm ... maybe it was a mix of both? > From the very pen ... er ... keyboard (I-phone?, tablet?) > of Jeff Squyres: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2010/10/14463.php Good searching! No, my dim recollection has something to do with

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Gus Correa
Jeff Squyres wrote: On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Gus Correa wrote: Do you want to add this kind of info to the FAQ? I seem to recall that the gettimeofday question has come up before...? Indeed, but often related to the accuracy of the MPI_Wtime clock, IIRR. No, I have a dim recollection

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Gus Correa wrote: >> Do you want to add this kind of info to the FAQ? I seem to recall that the >> gettimeofday question has come up before...? > > Indeed, but often related to the accuracy of the MPI_Wtime clock, IIRR. No, I have a dim recollection that it came u

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Gus Correa
Jeff Squyres wrote: Shiqing -- Do you want to add this kind of info to the FAQ? I seem to recall that the gettimeofday question has come up before...? Indeed, but often related to the accuracy of the MPI_Wtime clock, IIRR. Gus Correa On Aug 31, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Shiqing Fan wrote: Hi

Re: [OMPI users] Question regarding SELF-checkpointing

2011-08-31 Thread Josh Hursey
That seems like a bug to me. What version of Open MPI are you using? How have you setup the C/R functionality (what MCA options do you have set, what command line options are you using)? Can you send a small reproducing application that we can test against? That should help us focus in on the pro

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Jeff Squyres
Shiqing -- Do you want to add this kind of info to the FAQ? I seem to recall that the gettimeofday question has come up before...? On Aug 31, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Shiqing Fan wrote: > Hi Fabien, > > The GCC build under MinGW is not supported in Open MPI 1.4.3. The initial > support is now in t

Re: [OMPI users] Mingw - Gfortran - Cmake : 'gettimeofday'

2011-08-31 Thread Shiqing Fan
Hi Fabien, The GCC build under MinGW is not supported in Open MPI 1.4.3. The initial support is now in trunk, but needs more test. Actually, you may also try building 1.4.3 with Visual Studio Express with Fortran bindings for gfortran. Just configure the solution for Visual Studio, and speci

[OMPI users] Question regarding SELF-checkpointing

2011-08-31 Thread Faisal Shahzad
Dear Group, I have a mpi-program in which every process is communicating with its neighbors. When SELF-checkpointing, every process writes to a separate file.Problem is that sometimes after making a checkpoint, program does not continue again. Having more number of processes makes this problem