Dear All,
After searching for some week to find a program to do 100 000 000#+ Mersenne
Prime with MPI, my research resulted to nothing.
So, now i'm ready to pay, if someone can implement MPI to mprime :
http://mersenneforum.org/gimps/source2511.zip , or to
Glucas : http://www.oxixares.com/glucas/.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> No. Open MPI does not have MPD -- I think you're thinking of a different MPI
> implementation. :-)
Someone pointed out to me off-list that I wasn't quite clear here...
*If* all of your architectures are the same endian and otherwise equivalent
Good!
Sent from my PDA. No type good.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, "Richard Walsh" wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Regarding building HD5 ... the OpenMPI 1.4.1 wrapper using the May 2010
> release of the Intel Compiler Toolkit Cluster Edition (ICTCE) worked for me.
> Here is my config.log header:
>
> $
We've been trying to convince people to use thewrappers unless they have a
*really, really good* reason not to for years. :(
Sent from my PDA. No type good.
On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:59 PM, "Gus Correa" wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Götz Waschk wrote:
>>> I have solve
All,
Regarding building HD5 ... the OpenMPI 1.4.1 wrapper using the May 2010
release of the Intel Compiler Toolkit Cluster Edition (ICTCE) worked for me.
Here is my config.log header:
$ ./configure CC=mpicc CXX=mpiCC F77=mpif77 FC=mpif90 --enable-parallel
--prefix=/share/apps/hdf5/1.8.4p --wi
On Oct 7, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Durga Choudhury wrote:
> If I compile with --enable-heterogenous flag for different
> *architectures* (I have a mix of old 32 bit x86, newer x86_64 and some
> Cell BE based boxes (PS3)), would I be able to form a MPD ring between
> all these different machines?
No. Op
On Oct 7, 2010, at 3:44 PM, David Ronis wrote:
> I have various boxes that run openmpi and I can't seem to use all of
> them at once because they have different CPU's (e.g., pentiums, athlons
> (both 32 bit) vs Intel I7 (64 bit)).
You could also just compile everything 32 bit, and then not use
Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Götz Waschk wrote:
I have solved this problem myself. The trick is not to use the
compiler wrappers but icc and ifort directly. But in that case you'll
have to link to libmpi_f77 manually and set the variable RUNPARALLEL
to a working mpirun comman
Ed Peddycoart wrote:
After searching some more and reading some FAQs on the
opmi website, I see sugestions on how to make a remote app use the
local display to render, but that isn't what I need... Let me revise or
clarify my question:
I have an app which will run on 5 mach
I have a glut app I am infusing with MPI calls... The glut init appears to fail
in the rank1 processes. How do I accomplish this, that is, parallel rendering
with GLUT and MPI?
Ed
After searching some more and reading some FAQs on the opmi website, I see
sugestions on how to make a remote app use the local display to render, but
that isn't what I need... Let me revise or clarify my question:
I have an app which will run on 5 machines: The app will be kicked off on
M
On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Götz Waschk wrote:
> I have solved this problem myself. The trick is not to use the
> compiler wrappers but icc and ifort directly. But in that case you'll
> have to link to libmpi_f77 manually and set the variable RUNPARALLEL
> to a working mpirun command.
Strange.
B
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Götz Waschk wrote:
>>> Do -Wl,-rpath and -Wl,-soname= work any better?
>> Yes, with these options, it build fine. But the command line is
>> generated by libtool, so how can I make libtool to use -Wl, in front
>> of
Ah - I was unfamiliar with that option. Thanks!
David: does that meet the need?
On Oct 8, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Reuti wrote:
> Am 08.10.2010 um 00:40 schrieb Ralph Castain:
>
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Reuti wrote:
>>
>>> Am 07.10.2010 um 01:55 schrieb David Turner:
>>>
Hi,
>>
Am 08.10.2010 um 00:40 schrieb Ralph Castain:
>
> On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Reuti wrote:
>
>> Am 07.10.2010 um 01:55 schrieb David Turner:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We would like to set process memory limits (vmemoryuse, in csh
>>> terms) on remote processes. Our batch system is torque/moab.
>>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
