On Jun 18, 2010, at 9:57 AM, David Turner wrote:
> I downloaded openmpi-1.4.3a1r23261.tar.gz, dated June 9. It behaves the
> same as 1.4.2. Is there a newer version available for testing?
Not yet. Ticket 2431 was just approved to be put back to the 1.4 branch (which
contains the fix); it hasn
Hi,
On 06/17/2010 03:34 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
No more info required - it's a bug. Fixed and awaiting release of 1.4.3.
I downloaded openmpi-1.4.3a1r23261.tar.gz, dated June 9. It behaves the
same as 1.4.2. Is there a newer version available for testing?
On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Davi
Sorry for the confusion; I was asking George which one wins. I'm not active in
the MX portion of the OMPI code base, so I don't know which one is better /
should be used.
On Jun 18, 2010, at 8:19 AM, guillaume ranquet wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
sorry for the very long delay, I didn't understood you waited an answer
from my side on this. (the debate seemed to be between maintainers)
do not hesitate to bug me if I'm not answering after some days.
to answer shortly:
- -yes I've tested t
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:33 PM, David Turner wrote:
>
> > Please verify: if using openib BTL, the only threading model is
> MPI_THREAD_SINGLE?
>
> Up to MPI_THREAD_SERIALIZED.
>
> > Is there a timeline for full support of MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE in
