On 05/28/2010 08:20 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On May 16, 2010, at 5:21 AM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/parallel/openmpi/patches/
Sorry for the high latency reply...
aa: We haven't added RPATH support yet. We've talked about it but never done
it. There a
On May 16, 2010, at 5:21 AM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/parallel/openmpi/patches/
Sorry for the high latency reply...
aa: We haven't added RPATH support yet. We've talked about it but never done
it. There are some in OMPI who insist that rpath support
Thanks for the ping -- sorry it took so long!
Committed to the SVN trunk in r23215; I filed CMR's for v1.4 and v1.5. It's
technically not a bug, so I don't know if the v1.4 RM's will allow it.
On May 27, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:06 -0700, S
Ping.
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 14:06 -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> request_get_status polls request->req_complete before calling
> opal_progress. Ideally, it would check req_complete, call opal_progress,
> and check req_complete one final time. This patch identically mirrors
> the logic
On May 26, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Michael E. Thomadakis wrote:
> How do you handle thread/task and memory affinity? Do you pass the requested
> affinity desires to the batch scheduler and them let it issue the specific
> placements for threads to the nodes ?
Not as of yet, no. At the moment, Open
On May 24, 2010, at 20:27 , Eugene Loh wrote:
> Gijsbert Wiesenekker wrote:
>
>> My MPI program consists of a number of processes that send 0 or more
>> messages (using MPI_Isend) to 0 or more other processes. The processes check
>> periodically if messages are available to be processed. It wa
