Re: [OMPI users] btl udapl leaves string uninitialised

2010-01-07 Thread Don Kerr
Yes I understand what you are doing but there is still a possible error case I was trying to consider and your initial placement of the call outside of the af==AF_INET check lead me to assume you were using something other than IPv4 which is why I was asking if you had an example. You don't a

Re: [OMPI users] btl udapl leaves string uninitialised

2010-01-07 Thread Dennis Schridde
Hello Don! Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010 23:22:27 schrieben Sie: > I am assuming you are using something other than IPv4 so I am curious > what the string looks like when you call > " > inet_ntop(AF_INET, (void *) &btl_addr->sin_addr, > btl_addr_string, INET_ADDRSTRLEN); > " >

Re: [OMPI users] Problems compiling OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3

2010-01-07 Thread Tim Miller
Oddly, it wouldn't work even with the CPPFLAGS set (I tried setting CFLAGS too just to be sure). I'm thinking it must be gremlins of some sort :-). Meanwhile, I've bitten the bullet and upgraded myself to PGI 10.0-1 and things seem to be compiling happily now for 1.4.1rc1. Thanks for all of the su

Re: [OMPI users] Problem building OpenMPI with PGI compilers

2010-01-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
If you didn't catch it, 1.4.1rc1 went out yesterday evening. If all goes well (gulp!), we'll ship 1.4.1 "final" shortly... On Dec 28, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Joshua Bernstein wrote: > Thanks Ralph, > > I'll keep an eye out... > > -Josh > > Ralph Castain wrote: > > Sometime Jan, would be my

Re: [OMPI users] does OpenMPI started deprecating udapl support

2010-01-07 Thread Don Kerr
Hi, I can only speak to Sun's use of uDAPL as it relates to MPI. From what I can tell Sun is the only group interested in the uDAPL BTL in Open MPI at this point. In contrast, Open MPI has many active members interested in the development of the OpenIB BTL which uses the user verbs protocol.

Re: [OMPI users] btl udapl leaves string uninitialised

2010-01-07 Thread Don Kerr
Hi Dennis, I will look at this today. And apply the change as appropriate. -DON On 01/07/10 06:41, Dennis Schridde wrote: Hello! In btl_udapl_proc.c, if peer_proc->proc_addr_count <= 0, btl_addr_string will not be initialised. Attached is a patch that initialised btl_addr_string at the firs

Re: [OMPI users] Problem compiling 1.4.0 snap with PGI 10.0-1 and openib flags turned on ...

2010-01-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
Sorry -- you caught us over the holidays (I didn't look at any mail after Dec 19th). Don't use --enable-openib-ibcm. It's broken. An IB vendor may fix it someday, but for the moment, it's broken. We should probably disable it in the v1.4 and v1.5 series... On Dec 29, 2009, at 3:20 PM, Rich

Re: [OMPI users] does OpenMPI started deprecating udapl support

2010-01-07 Thread Don Kerr
Sorry I responded the wrong thread. Ignore my response. On 01/07/10 09:48, Don Kerr wrote: I will take a look today. -DON On 01/07/10 09:34, Jeff Squyres wrote: This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while. O

Re: [OMPI users] does OpenMPI started deprecating udapl support

2010-01-07 Thread Don Kerr
I will take a look today. -DON On 01/07/10 09:34, Jeff Squyres wrote: This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while. On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Nilesh Awate wrote: Hi all, I am new to Open MPI mailing li

Re: [OMPI users] does OpenMPI started deprecating udapl support

2010-01-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
This is a question for Sun to answer; they've been the primary/only drivers behind Open MPI's udapl support for quite a while. On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Nilesh Awate wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am new to Open MPI mailing list. Just started using it for our proprietary > interconnect > > wh

Re: [OMPI users] Problems compiling OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3

2010-01-07 Thread Jeff Squyres
Here's the comment I put in OMPI's configure script with regards to the offsetof problem: # This macro checks to ensure that the compiler properly supports # offsetof(). The PGI compilers had a problem with this macro in some # versions of their compiler on some platforms (e.g., 9.0-1 on # x86_6

[OMPI users] btl udapl leaves string uninitialised

2010-01-07 Thread Dennis Schridde
Hello! In btl_udapl_proc.c, if peer_proc->proc_addr_count <= 0, btl_addr_string will not be initialised. Attached is a patch that initialised btl_addr_string at the first possible moment, which fixes this problem. Regards, Dennis Schridde --- openmpi-1.4/ompi/mca/btl/udapl/btl_udapl_proc.c.orig

Re: [OMPI users] Problems compiling OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3

2010-01-07 Thread Ake Sandgren
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:57 +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: > On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Tim Miller wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to compile OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3 and am getting the > > following error in configure: > > > > checking for functional offsetof macro... no > > configure:

Re: [OMPI users] Problems compiling OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3

2010-01-07 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Wednesday 06 January 2010, Tim Miller wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to compile OpenMPI 1.4 with PGI 9.0-3 and am getting the > following error in configure: > > checking for functional offsetof macro... no > configure: WARNING: Your compiler does not support offsetof macro > configure: error: