Jeff,
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Problem building OpenMPI with PGI compilers
From: Jeff Squyres
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:20:32 -0500
To: Open MPI Users
...
Actually, I was wrong. You *can't* just take the SVN trunk's autogen.sh and
use it with a v1.4 tarball (for various uninteresting reas
On Dec 9, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> One (on gcc only): the D_FORTIFY_SOURCE build failure. I've had to
> move the if test "$using_gcc" = 0; then line down to after the
> RPM_OPT_FLAGS= that includes D_FORTIFY_SOURCE; otherwise the compile
> blows up.
Hmm. Can you explain why / prov
Sorry -- I neglected to update the list yesterday: I got the RM approval and
committed the fix to the v1.4 branch. So the PGI fix should be in last night's
1.4 snapshot.
Could someone out in the wild give it a whirl and let me know if it works for
you? (it works for *me*)
On Dec 10, 2009,
On my system, mpirun -np 8 -mca btl_sm_num_fifos 7 is much slower (and
appeared to hang after several thousand interations) than -mca btl ^sm
Is there another better way I should be modifying fifos to get better
performance?
Matt
On Dec 11, 2009, at 4:04 AM, Terry Dontje wrote:
>>
>> Date
Hi Josh
Here you go the file.
I will try to apply the trunk but I think that I broke-up my openmpi
installation doing "something" and I don't know what :-( . I was
modifying the mca parameters...
When I send a job, the orted daemon expanded in the SLAVE host is
launched in a bucle till they s
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:57:27 -0500
From: Jeff Squyres
On Dec 10, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Gus Correa wrote:
> How does the efficiency of loopback
> (let's say, over TCP and over IB) compare with "sm"?
Definitely not as good; that's why we have sm. :-) I don't have any
quantificatio
