Hi Jeff,
I thought that the problem mentioned in the NEWS was only for Cray systems. I
just checked ticket #1189 and this is exactly my case :-)
Thanks a lot !
Mehdi
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org on behalf of Jeff Squyres
Sent: Wed 27/
Sorry for the delay in replying.
Looks like this was fixed already in OMPI 1.2.5. So if you upgrade to
1.2.6, you should be good. 1.2.7 should be out Real Soon Now, too.
On Aug 21, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Mehdi Bozzo-Rey wrote:
Hello,
Looks like a bug; did I miss something ?
My environme
Hi Robert
Dick Treumann - MPI Team
IBM Systems & Technology Group
Dept X2ZA / MS P963 -- 2455 South Road -- Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Tele (845) 433-7846 Fax (845) 433-8363
users-boun...@open-mpi.org wrote on 08/27/2008 11:55:58 AM:
<< snip >>
>
> However from an application point of vie
On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Richard Treumann wrote:
Robert -
A return from a blocking send means the application send buffer is
available for reuse. If it is a BSEND, the application buffer could
be available because the message data has been copied to the
attached buffer or because th
Robert -
A return from a blocking send means the application send buffer is
available for reuse. If it is a BSEND, the application buffer could be
available because the message data has been copied to the attached buffer
or because the data has been delivered to the destination. The application
As I mentioned it might be, it was a local issue.
The lesson is that one should be very careful about OFED versions and
cleanliness. :)
--andy
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Andrew J Caird wrote:
Hello all,
We recently applied the latest RedHat update (/etc/redhat-release says
"Red Hat Enterprise L
Interesting, MPI_Brecv is not in the standard (MPI_Bsend is). I don't
understand why a recv could not implemented with an external buffer.
Anyway, my bad, I was assuming MPI_Brecv was on. Thanks George for
pointing this out.
On Aug 27, 2008, at 7:14 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
What is the def
What is the definition of a buffered receive ?
george.
On Aug 26, 2008, at 10:17 PM, Robert Kubrick wrote:
From a performance point of view, which one is better:
MPI_Battach(10*sizeof(MSG))
MPI_Brecv()
or
MPI_recv_init()
MPI_recv_init()
MPI_recv_init()
... /* 10 recv handlers */
MPI_Start
