[OMPI users] SGE and OFED1.1

2007-06-06 Thread Michael Edwards
I am runing open-mpi 1.1.1-1 compiled from OFED1.1 which I downloaded from their website. I am using SGE installed via OSCAR 5.0 and when running under SGE I get the "mca_mpool_openib_register: ibv_reg_mr(0x59,528384) failed with error: Cannot allocate memory" error discussed at length in you

Re: [OMPI users] MX MPI latency measurements

2007-06-06 Thread George Bosilca
If you use one of the latest version of MX (such as 1.2.0f) there will be less than 0.15 micro-second difference between the MTL and BTL MX. This version of MX allow us to do the matching outside the NIC, which decrease the overhead for small messages. In terms of bandwidth the BTL MX is so

Re: [OMPI users] MX MPI latency measurements

2007-06-06 Thread Tim Prins
Note that since you are setting OMPI_MCA_pml to cm, OMPI_MCA_btl will have no effect. You may try setting OMPI_MCA_pml=ob1, and trying your measurements again, but we generally get better performance with the cm pml than then ob1 pml. Tim On Wednesday 06 June 2007 12:54:26 pm George Bosilca wr

Re: [OMPI users] how to identify openmpi in configure script

2007-06-06 Thread Lie-Quan Lee
Hi Jeff, Thanks for willing to put more thought on it. Here is my simplified story. I have an accelerator physics code, Omega3P that is to perform complex eigenmode analysis. The algorithm for solving eigensystems makes use of a 3rd-party sparse direct solver called MUMPS (http:// graal.e

Re: [OMPI users] MX MPI latency measurements

2007-06-06 Thread Christopher D. Maestas
George, Apologies for not saying what latency is with Open MPI. I've noted it below. I don't know why turning off the sm feature would help launching 1ppn. I just tried turning it off and it didn't make a difference. -cdm On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, George Bosilca wrote: Which one is the latency

Re: [OMPI users] MX MPI latency measurements

2007-06-06 Thread George Bosilca
Which one is the latency with Open MPI ? Which version of Open MPI ? You might want to use OMPI_MCA_btl=mx,self to see if it makes any difference. Thanks, george. On Jun 6, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Maestas, Christopher Daniel wrote: With 2 nodes using 1.1.7 with the patch we measured (usin

[OMPI users] MX MPI latency measurements

2007-06-06 Thread Maestas, Christopher Daniel
With 2 nodes using 1.1.7 with the patch we measured (using mpich-mx 1.2.7..4): 3.07us With mx 1.2.1-rc18 we measure: 3.69 us And with mpich-mx 1.2.7..4 we see: 3.20us Our Open MPI settings: --- # env | grep OMPI OMPI_MCA_pml=cm OMPI_MCA_mpi_keep_hostnames=1 OMPI_MCA_oob_tc

[OMPI users] open-mpi with ifort in debug..trouble

2007-06-06 Thread Srinath Vadlamani
So I have been trying to build multiple applications with an ifort+gcc implementation of Open-MPI. I wanted to build them in debug mode. This is on a Macbook Pro System Version:Mac OS X 10.4.9 (8P2137) Kernel Version:Darwin 8.9.1 gcc :gcc version 4.0.1 ifort: 10.0.16 I have tried bui

Re: [OMPI users] how to identify openmpi in configure script

2007-06-06 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Lie-Quan Lee wrote: it is a quite of headache for each compiler/platform to deal with mixed language issues. I have to compile my application on IBM visual age compiler, Pathscale, Cray X1E compiler, intel/openmpi, intel/mpich, PGI compiler ... And of course, openmp