On Jun 14, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
We're a quiet bunch. :-)
Which is a bad thing for Open Source development. It seems Open MPI is
closed-source development project with an open-source release model.
The FAQ claims the future is in Open Source code, methodology, and
philos
On Jun 14, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jonathan Day wrote:
The mailing list has fallen virtually silent, there's
no beta yet out and (although I may have missed it)
there doesn't seem to be much in the way of updates on
the website.
We're a quiet bunch. :-)
Seriously, we didn't really anticipate much
> > Also on the fantasy wish list is for the libraries to
> > be installed in libtool form (unless you go away from autotools
> > altogether).
>
> Do you mean install the .la files as well as the usual .so and .a
> files? If so, we already do that. If you mean something else, could
> you ex
On Jun 14, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Benjamin Allan wrote:
It would be nice if the c++ compiler wrapper were
installed under mpicxx, mpiCC, and mpic++ instead of
just the latter 2.
Yeah, we can do that, no problem. It won't be in the soon-to-ship
beta, but will be in the 1.0 and the SVN trunk.
A
It would be nice if the c++ compiler wrapper were
installed under mpicxx, mpiCC, and mpic++ instead of
just the latter 2.
Also on the fantasy wish list is for the libraries to
be installed in libtool form (unless you go away from autotools
altogether).
Ben Allan
snl/ca
Hi,
The mailing list has fallen virtually silent, there's
no beta yet out and (although I may have missed it)
there doesn't seem to be much in the way of updates on
the website.
Can someone on the project just confirm that you are,
indeed, all alive and well, not kidnapped by aliens,
or been dela
