Hello,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
...
> None the less, I'd suggest that virt-manager should be a explicitly
> asking for sockets=1,cores=N, as that has broader guest OS compatibility.
+1. Multiple sockets is pretty uncommon and often comes with significant
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > > Do you happen to know why libvirt is doing that? There are many other
> > > implications to configuring the system that
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:42:29PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2024, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you happen to know why libvirt i
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:48:07PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> > On 6/30/24 20:49, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Do you happen to know why libvirt is doing that? There are many o
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:48:07PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 6/30/24 20:49, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:15:56PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >>
> >>> With 6.5, we get 3600MiB/s; with 6.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:15:56PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > > With 6.5, we get 3600MiB/s; with 6.6 we get 1400MiB/s.
> > >
> > > The reason is that vi
On 6/30/24 20:49, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:15:56PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>
>>> With 6.5, we get 3600MiB/s; with 6.6 we get 1400MiB/s.
>>>
>>> The reason is that virt-manager by default sets up a topol
On Sun, 30 Jun 2024, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 08:15:56PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> > With 6.5, we get 3600MiB/s; with 6.6 we get 1400MiB/s.
> >
> > The reason is that virt-manager by default sets up a topology where we
> > have 16 sockets, 1 core per soc
