Re: fc12 encrypted file system

2010-05-15 Thread j . halifax .
I do support Tim's point of view. jh > Původní zpráva > Od: Tim > Předmět: Re: fc12 encrypted file system > Datum: 16.5.2010 06:49:08 > > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 00:05 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > > Strictly speaking you were no

VPN (pptpd) stopped working

2010-05-26 Thread j . halifax .
Hi all, Could you please advise, how to find why VPN which was working with pptpd stopped working? I was out and when I came I found the box down and since that time VPN is not working. - Windows client says Error 678 "The remote computer didn't respond" - (but I can ping it as 195.39.130.92

Routing problems

2010-02-17 Thread j . halifax .
Hi All, Could you please help me with routing in the LAN default GW box? I have eth0 connected to Internet eth2 to internal LAN 10.255.250.0 LAN default GW is 10.255.250.37 eth3 connected to other LAN Route in the default GW (10.255.250.37): Destination Gateway Genmask

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
> The only thing I can think of is to ask how iptables is set up. The iptables > are not used (I am not familiar with them, but tried different arrangement > and nothing helped). > I think you have iptables doing masquerading to the eth0 interface. > The masquerading shouldn't be the problem. Ye

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
> What is the address of the subnet "other LAN" ? > There seem to be two more subnets, 192.168.180.0 and 172.17.0.0. You are right, both of them are accessible through eth3 and the same box of 192.168.180.100 (I didn't include the whole routing table) like: 172.17.0.0192.168.180.100 255.255.0

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
> Please post > * Full details of your network > * The routing table, uncensored :) route Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.180.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth3 10.200.1.0 10.255.250.250 255.255.255.0

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
> I think the problem is probably the routing tables in the other boxes > in the same LAN (e.g. 10.255.250.38) route in 10.255.250.38: Destination Gateway GenmaskFlags Metric RefUse Iface 192.168.122.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 virbr0 10.255.250.0* 255.25

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-18 Thread j . halifax .
> What happens if you try to "ping" from the eth2 interface of the router? > ping -I 10.255.250.37 172.17.1.50 Commands issued in 10.255.l250.37 (via ssh 195.39.130.92): = ping -I 10.255.250.37 172.17.1.50 PING 172.17.1.50 (172.17.1.50) from 10.255.250.3

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-19 Thread j . halifax .
> ip rule list ip rule list 0: from all lookup local 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default > ip route list table local > ip route list table main > ip route list table default ip route list table local local 195.39.130.92 dev eth0 proto kernel

Re: Routing problems

2010-02-21 Thread j . halifax .
> Are you sure you have packet forwarding enabled? > What does 'sysctl -a | grep forward' say? sysctl -a | grep forward net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding = 1 net.ipv4.conf.all.mc_forwarding = 0 net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.mc_forwarding = 0 net.ipv4.conf.lo.forwarding = 1

Which "VIDEO-PLAYER" ?

2010-02-25 Thread j . halifax .
Hi video-gurus, Could you please give me an advice of which "video-player" (some SW) to use for the following task on FC12_64 ? (1) I need to create a web-site on my PC with a PLAYER playing video in one of its frames (2) The video-content played should be an "endless" list of small video-shot

Re: Which "VIDEO-PLAYER" ?

2010-02-26 Thread j . halifax .
> I think VLC and its streaming capabilities might do what you want to achieve. Actually, I don't need to stream the content, but your idea is good. I can stream the content and to see the result in the same PC in the browser. :) Thank you! jh > Původní zpráva > Od:

Re: Which "VIDEO-PLAYER" ?

2010-02-26 Thread j . halifax .
> On your web site you create an anchor to a video file, at the client > side (the computer visiting your site), the appropriate video player > will be launched. You could do a php script to do it a loop of > videos. Probably I didn't explain the task well. Everything should run in the same PC.

secure log stopped working

2010-03-04 Thread j . halifax .
Hi all, Don't you know anybody please what could be a reason that records of /var/log/secure stopped coming? Couldn't it be due to hacking the box? :( Thank you for any help. jh -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedo

Re: secure log stopped working

2010-03-04 Thread j . halifax .
> ...what could be a reason that records of > /var/log/secure stopped coming? kill -1 helped but I would like to understand possible causes anyway. Thank you. > Původní zpráva > Od: j.halifax . > Předmět: secure log stopped working > Datum: 04.3.2010 15:30:59 >

Re: secure log stopped working [SOLVED]

2010-03-04 Thread j . halifax .
> > ...I would like to understand possible causes anyway. > 1. out of space > 2. permission change (should be root:root 600) > 3. rsyslogd crash The (2) was my case. :) Thank you so much for making me good nights! ;))) jh > Původní zpráva > Od: Phil Meyer > Předmět: Re

GW (LAN1, LAN2, ADSL) config

2010-04-20 Thread j . halifax .
Hi All, please help me kindly to reconfig my default GW (Fedora 12). The GW has 3 active Ethernet cards: eth0 - connected to Internet ADSL router (incl. VPN, pptpd) eth1 - not used eth2 - LAN1 eth3 - LAN2. I had everything working fine but due to some problems I lost the configuration of the GW

Re: GW (LAN1, LAN2, ADSL) config

2010-04-20 Thread j . halifax .
> > > Is IP forwarding on? > Yes, it is. > Původní zpráva > Od: Terry Polzin > Předmět: Re: GW (LAN1, LAN2, ADSL) config > Datum: 20.4.2010 19:03:39 > > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 15:31 +0200, j.halifax . wrote: > > Hi All, > > >

Re: GW (LAN1, LAN2, ADSL) config

2010-04-20 Thread j . halifax .
> > .please do netstat -rn > Please also do /sbin/ifconfig -a > == netstat == # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.180.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth3 10.255.253.

USB Install problem with Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD

2010-08-01 Thread j . halifax .
Hi All, Could you help me pls with installing fc13 distribution of Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD from USB? I have created 8GB USB flash memory installation media with LiveUSB-Creator on MSW and used it for USB installation. After creating Install Target Device (HD) I got the following Error Message: ==

Re: USB Install problem with Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD

2010-08-02 Thread j . halifax .
Thank you! > Here is how I did it: > sudo /usr/bin/livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr Is the /livecd-iso-to-disk included in Fedora Live? Thanks. > Původní zpráva > Od: JD > Předmět: Re: USB Install problem with Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD > Datum: 02.8.2010 08:50:3

Re: USB Install problem with Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD

2010-08-02 Thread j . halifax .
Thank you... > $ rpm -qf --whatprovides /usr/bin/livecd-iso-to-disk > livecd-tools-031-1.fc12.1.i686 That's bad as I have no Internet yet.. :((( Thanks anyway... :) So you will need to yum nstall livecd-tools > Původní zpráva > Od: JD > Předmět: Re: USB Install probl

Re: USB Install problem with Fedora-13-x86_64-DVD - RESOLVED

2010-08-02 Thread j . halifax .
Great, Dar!!! I added iso file (after removing Packages and Repodata) and it really worked for me as for you.. :))) I supposed that If I offer the Creator the DVD iso file, that the corresponding stick will be created. It was the mistake. Thank you so much for your greta help! Regards jk

Re: LAN Card doesn't activate

2010-01-10 Thread j . halifax .
Hi Hugh, Thank you for your response and excuse for insufficient info... I'll add next details in your text. Regards, jh > Původní zpráva > Od: D. Hugh Redelmeier > Předmět: Re: LAN Card doesn't activate > Datum: 11.1.2010 02:10:49 > ---

Sat TV in private LAN

2010-01-12 Thread j . halifax .
Hi all, Can anyone recommend a solution based on Fedora 12 for streaming satellite channels in a private LAN? Thanks. Regards JH -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-12 Thread j . halifax .
Hi All, Can anyone advice what I need to do in Linux server to be able to connect to it by means of the Windows standard VPN connection? Thank you so much... Regards, hj -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
Thank you for your advise... The http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/2009/10/vpn-setup-using-pptp.html describes the connecting as Linux box to Linux VPN server (if I understand it correctly). No mention about MSW Leos -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://adm

Re: TV over the internet

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
Thank you for your response... Probably I didn't say what I want clearly enough. I want to receive TV from satellite and stream (re-broadcast) it in my LAN. :) Leos > It's not really linux supported but I have these guys hosting a > Slingbox for me in the US: > > http://statesidetv.net > > The

Re: TV over the internet

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
Thanx for your kind info. :) > Původní zpráva > Od: Ed Greshko > Předmět: Re: TV over the internet > Datum: 15.1.2010 00:22:58 > > Mark Mahabir wrote: > > > > The SlingPlayer software is free, officially supported for Windoze and

Re: TV over the internet

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> If you want a pure linux solution you'd first have to get a TV-Card for > your system with the ability to connect to a satellite receiver and then > use something like vlc to do the streaming within your LAN. I did that > a long time ago...so I can't really advise as to the set up. Yes, that e

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> However under Fedora, I can't fund the pptpd package. Yes. yum says me "No package pptpd available." :( Thank you. Leos > Původní zpráva > Od: Chris Smart > Předmět: Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box > Datum: 15.1.2010 00:46:40 > ---

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> try 'yum search pptp' Thanx, Carig, yum found it, so it should be included in the NM (which I don't use).: yum search pptp Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit = Matched: pptp NetworkManager-pptp.x86_64 : NetworkManager VPN plugin for pptp pptp.x86

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> All those look like client packages for connecting _to_ a vpn server, > not creating one. I don't see any server there, of course Fedora might > just bundle it in ppp or something, I've no idea.. I was advised to try "openswan"... So I'll do. Thank you. Leos. > Původní zpráva

Re: TV over the internet

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
Thanx for your methodology! :)) Leos > Původní zpráva > Od: Ed Greshko > Předmět: Re: TV over the internet > Datum: 15.1.2010 02:02:29 > > j.halifax . wrote: > >> If you want a pure linux solution you'd first have to get a TV-Card

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> So, the question is simply "what side do you want to be the server, and > what side the client". The server should run on Linux side. I believed that it implied from the Subject's "connect ... to Linux"; but I should say that explicitely. you are right. L:) > Původní zpráva ---

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-14 Thread j . halifax .
> I don't understand why. I tend to use RHEL or CentOS for servers so I > was unaware of this. Paul Horwatyh said (in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350381): === The poptop server has to the best of my knowledge never been packaged as part of Fedora. The client is commonly used fo

Re: Connect Standard Windows VPN to Linux box

2010-01-15 Thread j . halifax .
> I think that pptp is generally regarded as low quality, insecure vpn > tunnel and that Windows L2TP is a much better implementation as is openvpn. As for some external points of views I would agree, but I can not compare how they are made "inside". The necessity of having to install openvpn clie

Re: OpenOffice and password protected encrypted .docx files?

2010-02-04 Thread j . halifax .
> ...Since I don't have MS Office 2007 the question is whether > I can open the file at all? In such cases I ask the sender to export it as ".doc" and send it again. I do not accept M$' immoral pressure for buying unneeded new versions. > Původní zpráva > Od: Roger >