On 20.10.2018 10:57, bruce wrote:
However, the yahoo process seems to have issues with the emai. I've
submitted the test email address to the yahoo contacts list as well as
checking the spam folder. No luck.
see comments below
The headers of the email are:
usc_...@yahoo.com
Subject:
Activ
On 20.10.2018 17:28, bruce wrote:
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the reply.
is there any log maybe the mail is rejected or whatever?
your webserver should relay to sendmail/postfix and this part has the log;
your server should have a correct rDNS and DNS which is used in EHLO
smime.p7s
Descripti
On 28.10.2018 23:49, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I know this is strictly OT, but I suggest it's of some interest to this
list:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-to-acquire-red-hat-in-deal-valued-at-34-billion.html
poc
I guess this won't affect anything on the development of Fedora, RHEL,
Cen
On 15.02.2019 06:35, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Hi,
Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data?
you got already the answer that its unrealistic with your nealy zero budget
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
On 15.02.2019 09:46, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:40 PM Walter H. wrote:
On 15.02.2019 06:35, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Hi,
Could you recommend affordable and reliable cloud storage for 50 TB of data?
you got already the answer that its
Hello,
can help explain me a little bit...
I found this
https://getfedora.org/
there I downloaded the workstation iso and then
I found this
https://spins.fedoraproject.org/
what is the difference?
(I don't like the look and feel of GNOME, are theese at
https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ als
On 29.12.2020 07:10, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 29/12/2020 12:44, Tim via users wrote:
The key issue is "need." I'm unaware of anything, so far, that
actually needed IPv6. As yet, I think everything is still accessible
through IPv4 (which is probably why my ISP is dragging their heels on
making IPv6
On 29.12.2020 15:32, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Neal Becker said:
Let me say up front I'm not very knowledgeable about v6 yet. One reason I
don't want to enable it is the exact flip side of the address scarcity of
v4. Because of that, external connections are nat'd. That seems to
On 30.12.2020 05:58, Chris Adams wrote:
You cannot have NAT without the
exact same state tracking and ALGs of a stateful firewall.
guess why it is easier to break through NAT than through a stateful
firewall ...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Hello,
I'm using Windows with several virtual machines (VMware);
is there a way to use these virtual machines with Fedora as host OS?
Thanks,
Walter
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis
On 31.05.2017 12:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:01 +0200, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Windows with several virtual machines (VMware);
is there a way to use these virtual machines with Fedora as host OS?
Yes. There is a free-to-use version of VMware W
On 02.06.2017 15:27, InvalidPath wrote:
On Jun 2, 2017 6:06 AM, "Walter H." <mailto:walte...@mathemainzel.info>> wrote:
On 31.05.2017 12 :03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:01 +0200, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
my older computer is a Core2Quad with 4 GB RAM had a hard disk with a
Windows 10
what I did:
- I plugged this harddisk as harddisk 2 and added an empty harddisk as
harddisk 1
- I downloaded Fedora 25 KDE (Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso) and
burnt this to a DVD
- I installed thi
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
That being said
how do I this?
after the connection with mstsc, I get a window where I can s
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc client on windows
and a Vnc Server on the Linux side...
That being said
h
On 05.06.2017 16:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 21:30, Walter H. wrote:
On 05.06.2017 09:18, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 14:31, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
On 05.06.2017 01:52, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/05/17 04:37, Walter H. wrote:
FWIW, in the past I've found it easier to run a Vnc c
On 05.06.2017 16:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
That is documentation from F14 and is way out of date.
of course and didn't meet my needs as there must be a user logged on ...
Again, late hour, I should have also mentioned that the AVC messages are
held in /var/log/audit/audit.log
You can grep on type=
Hello,
as this is the first time I'm using Fedora, I noticed the following ...
(a) when open a SSH connection, it tells e.g.
Last login: Mon Jun 5 20:14:37 2017 from 192.168.1.1
all other Linux VMs and/or the Router box show there
Last login: Sat Jun 3 21:41:45 2017 from winpc.local
(b) when
On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
be a problem.
I'm using inside my network a .local domain which is defined in a ZONE
on my DNS - so no problem ...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_
On 05.06.2017 21:01, Daniel Walsh wrote:
On 06/05/2017 02:09 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I did it this way: stored the following to e.g. bugfix.tt
module systemd_vnc_bugfix 1.0.0;
require {
type user_home_t;
type init_t;
class file { open read unlink
On Mon, June 5, 2017 22:25, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 11:44 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>> On 05.06.2017 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> nslookup resolved the .local addresses? That's surprising and might
>>> be a problem.
>> I'm using inside my network
On Tue, June 6, 2017 06:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762 .local is reserved for
> MDNS use and is not supposed to be DNS resolvable.
exact this RFC says in "Appendix G. Private DNS Namespaces"
"We do not recommend use of unregistered top-level
domains at a
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
>> .intranet.
>> .internal.
>> .private.
>> .corp.
>> .home.
>> .lan."
>>
>> and the TLD .home. is just in a pre-registration phase ...
>>
>&
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> .lan meets your requirements and I have seen that used. Or you could
> make up something random. Since it's just your private network, if the
> one you choose gets used later, you will have to change it again, but
> you'll have lots of warning.
I
On 06.06.2017 16:43, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
Swell. Happen to know of a registrar that will let me register a
domain that has no public facing DNS server? (At pretty much zero
cost, of course)
Almost any registrar should let you do t
On 06.06.2017 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP won't change these are true
bugs.
I don't understand what you're say
On 06.06.2017 20:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I had .home., but when I noticed that the pre-registration of .home.
has started, I changed this to .local.;
And that's when your problems started.
no. it startet with this Fedora box, or to say it differ
On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
the replied with the following:
Regarding your private network, if it will not be published on Internet,
you can use whatever you want. You may avoid to uses existing TLD's and
reserved ones (such as
On 06.06.2017 20:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 11:22 AM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 11:27 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On Tue, June 6, 2017 07:40, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/05/2017 10:19 PM, Walter H. wrote:
p.s. in case the phenomenas of the OP
On 06.06.2017 21:59, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:49 PM, Walter H. wrote:
so when renaming my local domain to something different, this must be
sure, that not any other future bug
makes me renaming it again ...
There are no guarantees, but at this point .lan is not likely to have
any
On Tue, June 6, 2017 06:31, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> OP is using that domain in standard DNS, in violation of relevant
> standards.
can someone bring this to a standard
https://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-hoehlhubmer-private-tlds-00.txt
___
users mailing
On 06.06.2017 21:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 06.06.2017 20:11, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/06/2017 04:56 AM, Walter H. wrote:
So .lan. can't be used.
> It can be used, just be aware that maybe someday in the future it
will have a different
On 06.06.2017 22:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/06/2017 12:41 PM, Walter H. wrote:
I replied to this mail with:
if I interpret your reply correctly, I could also use just .waldi or
.waldinet?
and their reply was:
If it's only for internal network, you can use .waldi or .waldinet.
I
On 07.06.2017 17:40, stan wrote:
But the message that shows up as the empty dots in Samuel's message is
from Walter and has the following encoding.
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===7498209977189103805=="
this is because, my Thunderbird generates both variants, the text/pla
On 07.06.2017 20:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/07/2017 11:29 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 06/07/2017 11:19 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/07/2017 10:17 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
I don't see any reason that you couldn't use that. My only concern is
that recursive/caching nameservers would 1) have to be
On 05.06.2017 22:44, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Sounds likely. In this case, you probably want to *remove* nss-mdns,
remove the whole X? :D
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, June 7, 2017 22:08, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 12:05 PM, Walter H. wrote:
>> On 05.06.2017 22:44, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> Sounds likely. In this case, you probably want to *remove* nss-mdns,
>> remove the whole X? :D
>>
>
> I don't
On Wed, June 7, 2017 23:27, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/08/17 00:25, Walter H. wrote:
>> On 07.06.2017 17:40, stan wrote:
>>>
>>> But the message that shows up as the empty dots in Samuel's message is
>>> from Walter and has the following encoding.
>&g
On Thu, June 8, 2017 09:00, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/08/17 14:23, Walter H. wrote:
>> right, I had once configured to only send HTML mail to specific
>> domains,
>> which means to any other it is plain-text
>>
>> it seems that the mailinglist-mailman is broken ...
On 07.06.2017 18:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/07/2017 09:18 AM, Walter H. wrote:
today I found this:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/
as it seems, will .home declared as special domain for private use
similar to RFC1918 IP addresses ...
I've the sol
On 08.06.2017 15:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
I don't recall putting out any headers that showed your message
containing HTML.
of copurse not, I guessed this from multipart/mixed ...
I do see what you mean about S/MIME. I've not used that in quite some
time so I'd have to look to see how/why it ge
On Fri, June 9, 2017 22:33, Tim wrote:
> I run a local DNS server, that's integrated with my DHCP server (in that
> new hosts assigned an IP by the DHCP server get their data incorporated
> into the DNS server, so all clients on my LAN use my DNS server for
> *all* name resolution, local and WWW).
On 12.06.2017 16:35, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 12 June 2017, Walter H. sent:
which Domain do you use for local?
Back to the general question...
I'd certainly like to see .lan reserved as for use with private LANs,
just for this, there exists an I-D, which will become an RFC, and
Hello,
Jun 19 20:18:01 fedorabox postfix/smtp[4723]: error: unsupported
dictionary type: pcre
what is this?
header_checks tells this and I'm used to use pcre with postfix ...
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/smtp_hdr_chks.pcre
smtp_mime_header_checks =
smtp_nested
Hello,
I did nearly the same as here
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-TigerVNC.html#s3-configuring-vnc-server
by the way this
ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry
1280x1024"
must be
ExecStart=/usr/bin/vncserver %
On 26.06.2017 05:10, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/26/17 01:19, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
I did nearly the same as here
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-TigerVNC.html#s3-configuring-vnc-server
by the way this
ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "
On 27.06.2017 19:23, Walter H. wrote:
xrandr only shows
Screen 0: minimum 32 x 32, current 1024 x 768, maximum 32768 x 32768
VNC-0 connected primary 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1600x1200 60.00 +
1920x1200 60.00
1920x1080 60.00
1680x1050 60.00
1400x1050 60.00
On 30.06.2017 00:51, stan wrote:
Wikileaks released a document about an attack against CentOS / Rhel.
https://wikileaks.org/vault7/#OutlawCountry
Here's the text, there are some docs there also.
My first take is that this doesn't represent a very serious threat. Do
you disagree?
if we were t
Hello,
I did this as explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
and after this I can't start VMware Workstation;
removing and installing VMware Workstation (latest release: 12.5.7) new
doesn't help ...
(the same as if I hadn't removed and installed new)
ifconfig only
On 12.07.2017 21:27, Mark C. Allman wrote:
On 07/12/2017 12:14 PM, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
I did this as explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
and after this I can't start VMware Workstation;
removing and installing VMware Workstation (latest release: 12.5.7
On 14.07.2017 00:26, Mark C. Allman wrote:
On 07/13/2017 12:33 PM, Walter H. wrote:
On 12.07.2017 21:27, Mark C. Allman wrote:
On 07/12/2017 12:14 PM, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
I did this as explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
and after this I can't start V
tried VMware Wkst. 12.5.6, also 12.5.7 ... no change ...
even the hack to get the additional virtual network interfaces, nothing
helped ...
maybe the next release of VMware Wkst. 12.5.8 will run ...
as VMware Wkst. is essential for me, there is no way having Linux
instead of Windows;
the deci
ledge about it ...
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:10 PM Walter H. <mailto:walte...@mathemainzel.info>> wrote:
tried VMware Wkst. 12.5.6, also 12.5.7 ... no change ...
even the hack to get the additional virtual network interfaces,
nothing
helped ...
maybe the next release
vice
>> versa? If you're trying to host
>> windows inside linux is KVM/Qemu
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:10 PM Walter H.
>> wrote:
>> > tried VMware Wkst. 12.5.6, also 12.5.7 ... no change ...
>> > even the hack to get the additional virtual n
On Mon, July 31, 2017 10:58, Dr J Austin wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 10:04 +0200, Walter H. wrote:
>> On Sun, July 30, 2017 21:14, Dr J Austin wrote:
>> >
>> > Assuming you are running the linux version of WS 12.5.7
>> > and F26 kernel 4.11.11-300.fc26.x86_6
On Mon, July 31, 2017 14:00, InvalidPath wrote:
>
> Being a long time Vmware user, a shirt time kvm user.. I still dont
> understand why vmware is a must in your situation.
KVM for Windows?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Mon, July 31, 2017 16:20, InvalidPath wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Walter H.
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, July 31, 2017 14:00, InvalidPath wrote:
>> >
>> > Being a long time Vmware user, a shirt time kvm user.. I still dont
>> > underst
On 15.08.2017 19:54, Bob Goodwin wrote:
When I address Firefox to https://www.google.com I get a message at
the bottom of my screen "Performing a TLS handshake to www.google.com"
and it looks like nothing more than that is ever going to happen ...
whereelse do you expect to perform the TLS hand
F25 was running fine; after upgrade to F26 my VMware was broken,
now I have a VMware running with F26, which brings this:
"This host does not support "Intel EPT" hardware assisted MMU
virtualization.
This host does not support virtualizing real mode.
The Intel "VMX Unrestricted Guest" feature i
On 30.09.2017 19:48, JD wrote:
On 09/30/2017 11:38 AM, Walter H. wrote:
F25 was running fine; after upgrade to F26 my VMware was broken,
now I have a VMware running with F26, which brings this:
"This host does not support "Intel EPT" hardware assisted MMU
virtualization.
Thi
On 30.09.2017 22:57, Robbi Nespu wrote:
I saw, the thread inside VMware official forum about the problems too,
which fault come from VMware it self.
But recently with new update, it worked flawless for VMware Player
14.0.0 build-6661328 and VMware Workstation 14.0.0 build-6661328
exact this r
On 01.10.2017 11:48, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/01/17 01:38, Walter H. wrote:
F25 was running fine; after upgrade to F26 my VMware was broken,
now I have a VMware running with F26, which brings this:
"This host does not support "Intel EPT" hardware assisted MMU virtualization.
Thi
Hello,
I tried your programme on my system (other linux distribution), and got
the same result;
even on windows the same results;
but this is interesting
# date --date="Dec 1 00:00:00 2019" +"%s"
1575154800
# date --date="Nov 30 23:59:59 2019" +"%s"
1575154799
there you have this 1 second d
always get 500
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.or
ver a week? So probable
something local.
On 8 Apr 2024 at 10:57, Walter H. via users wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:failing
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/freeotp-devel.lists.fedorahosted.org/
Organization: Home
Date sent: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:
These three kernels
kernel-6.10.4-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.5-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64
won't start my VM properly, ends in a black screen,
where I can see mouse moventments, and that was it ...
no login, nothing;
kernel-6.10.3-200.fc40.x86_64 works fine
using LXDM
Thank
On 24.08.2024 13:40, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 8/23/24 1:52 PM, Walter H. via users wrote:
These three kernels
kernel-6.10.4-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.5-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64
won't start my VM properly, ends in a black screen,
where I can see
On 25.08.2024 09:37, Barry wrote:
On 24 Aug 2024, at 14:47, Walter H. via users
wrote:
it is a VMware Guest
I have not used vmware for a long time, but when I did it was
sometimes necessary to wait for vmware to fix something before a new
kernel would work.
I have nothing installed from
On 25.08.2024 09:53, Barry wrote:
On 25 Aug 2024, at 08:50, Walter H. via users
wrote:
I have not used vmware for a long time, but when I did it was
sometimes necessary to wait for vmware to fix something before a new
kernel would work.
I have nothing installed from vmware, the vmware
On 25.08.2024 21:40, Barry Scott wrote:
On 25 Aug 2024, at 11:43, Walter H. via users
wrote:
or the kernels later than 6.10.3 are buggy and this need to be fixed(!)
I tried the VM with latest VMware Wkstn. - same problem
As I said VMware has a history of breaking on new kernels.
Their
I'm running 16.2.4 and tried on 17.5.2
and yes, you can do SSH , and do
e.g. shutdown -h now
or cat |...
my Host system is Windows 10
On 27.08.2024 09:15, Will McDonald wrote:
So there's a common problem here with VMWare Workstation and f40?
What version of workstation are you both running?
hoices when creating these VM's (I
cannot recall what choices I made during VM configuration for Arch)."
when will this be fixed?
On 23.08.2024 19:52, Walter H. via users wrote:
These three kernels
kernel-6.10.4-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.5-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_
On 07.09.2024 14:18, Maarten Hoes wrote:
I have no idea when this will be fixed (or not). However, I personally was able to
work around it by *enabling* '3D Acceleration" in the VM settings (under
display) for my Fedora 40 VM. You could try to see if that works for you.
I enabled '3D Accelera
HostKeyAlgorithms +ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ssh-ed25519
PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes +ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ssh-ed25519
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to user
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016304 <-- still relevant
for fc36(!)
Why?
Thanks,
Walter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 23.08.2022 20:59, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:45:24 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016304 <-- still
relevant for fc36(!)
Why?
I think the answer is that no one has done the work. It has been a
long tim
On 24.08.2022 16:19, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:05:21 +0200
"Walter H. via users" wrote:
Just the unorthodox question, may I simple remove the link (rm -f
/etc/extlinux.conf)?
I noticed this, when I did the following in folder /etc
grep PATTERN /etc/* -r
Hello,
I've got a Win10 box und a Fedora VM
both are latest updates / release [Win10 22H2 19045.3086 and Fedora 38]
I was used to connect to the Fedora VM from the Win10 box
- with the OpenSSH commands, that are nativly available in Windows
- with WinSCP
- or the ssh commands inside the WSL [
On 14.07.2023 18:23, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:22:56 +0200 "Walter H. via users" wrote:
I added this inside the Fedora in the sshd_config
HostKeyAlgorithms +ssh-rsa
PubkeyAcceptedKeyTypes ssh-rsa
then the login using the keys from WSL were working
On 14.07.2023 21:26, Barry wrote:
On 14 Jul 2023, at 19:01, Walter H. via users
wrote:
ssh -i id_rsa youruser@fedorahost
doesn't work
this is quite strange; because the same keyfiles works from another Linux [not
Fedora]
what's causing this strange behaviour?
In cases like
On 16.07.2023 15:11, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 14:48:04 +0200 "Walter H. via users" wrote:
ssh -vvv didn't really give any useful hints; I guess the problem is NOT
caused by just the key;
Although a ED25519 one works ?
yes this does ...
You m
Hello,
I'm using for electronic banking a Fedora as VM guest on my Windows
Workstation;
actually Firefox 121.0
I've here a .ZIP-file containing two HTML-Files and a _files-Folder with
a few other files (JS, image, ...)
(did a download of the whole page, edited the HTML to remove data)
http
g the file 'firefox' the same result
(also with removing the fedora firefox package 'dnf -y remove firefox')
Walter
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 4:58 PM Walter H. via users
wrote:
> It's been my experience that the problem is likely with the website,
> not the brows
Have you tried this?
https://hosting117696.a2f78.netcup.net/xchg/_banking.zip
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedorapro
On 26.12.2023 01:13, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2023-12-25 at 14:21 +0100, Walter H. via users wrote:
Have you tried this?
https://hosting117696.a2f78.netcup.net/xchg/_banking.zip
If I then try loading the files inside the zip file into a web browser
I get pages with blank sections, and
On 17.01.2024 01:54, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 1/16/24 15:44, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/16/24 15:42, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/16/24 14:58, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 1/16/24 14:29, Barry wrote:
On 16 Jan 2024, at 20:43, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
"keysmith" looks like it is
On 20.01.2024 20:39, Tim via users wrote:
On Sat, 2024-01-20 at 20:00 +0100, Walter H. via users wrote:
buy an iPhone ...
exact this what you want is the other way of it sense;
2FA = 2 Factor Authentication
example you login on a site, there you have the knowledge of
user and password
and
On 20.01.2024 20:52, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Tim said:
That's one of my gripes about two-factor authentication - it
(typically) uses your phone. Steal someone's phone, and it's
everything they need to pretend to be you.
That's going to be true of any second-factor device. In the
I have successfully installed Win 11 build 21996.1 as a VMware Guest;
(used the ISO that was leaked several days ago)
On 02.07.2021 18:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or h
On 03.07.2021 08:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt wi
On 03.07.2021 23:17, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 13:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has thi
Hello,
can someone please give me a hint, where to look for the following
problem ...
I have several Linux VMs (all except this one are CentOS), and I took
/root/.ssh/authorized_keys from one of them
and copied it onto this Fedora box;
accessing from my Jump-VM also directly using SSH from
On 20.11.2021 14:27, George N. White III wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Walter H. via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
Hello,
can someone please give me a hint, where to look for the following
problem ...
I have several Linux VMs (all except th
On 20.11.2021 16:13, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
20.11.21, 15:24 +0100, Walter H. via users:
Nov 20 15:11:33 lxfedora sshd[2584]: userauth_pubkey: key type ssh-rsa
not in PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms [preauth]
so the question is: what is the default value of this
'PubkeyAcceptedAlgorithms
94 matches
Mail list logo
