On 28/6/17 11:52 am, stan wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:35:18 -
"William Mattison" wrote:
(replying to all three messages)
When I boot, the bios display says it is UEFI. Am I
mis-understanding what that means? Am I mis-using the term?
Your system supports efi, but it seems you aren't u
On 10/2/18 5:46 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/09/2018 09:40 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
IIRC, /boot/efi/* is created by the initial anaconda install sequence
and is in place in case you use UEFI at some point in the future. Since
it's only about 15MB in size, it's pretty innocuous and I wouldn't
worr
On 3/7/17 12:43 pm, William Mattison wrote:
That solved the more important part of the problem. The grub menu has an entry
for the correct, current kernel, and it boots the correct current kernel.
Thank-you, Sam.
Just some info on this. The original format of your grub menu, being one
line
On 7/7/17 2:25 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 07/03/2017 09:58 AM, William Mattison wrote:
Which is best:
1. completely remove the "video=vesa:off" from the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX
line,
or
2. change the "off" to "on" in that line?
Just remove it. Are you using the proprietary NVidia driver? Is that
On 11/2/18 7:00 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/10/2018 04:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 10/2/18 5:46 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/09/2018 09:40 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
IIRC, /boot/efi/* is created by the initial anaconda install sequence
and is in place in case you use UEFI at some point in
On 12/2/18 7:58 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/2/18 7:00 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/10/2018 04:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 10/2/18 5:46 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/09/2018 09:40 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
IIRC, /boot/efi/* is created by the initial anaconda install sequence
and is in
On 11/2/18 5:46 pm, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 12:07:50 +1100 Stephen Morris wrote:
Just some info on this. The original format of your grub menu, being one
line per kernel, was probably coming from grubby. When kernel installs
are done, the install process runs
On 12/2/18 12:48 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/11/2018 01:19 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just further to this, I have checked my boot order in the bios and it
is set to SSD, CDROM, UEFI: Builtin efi shell.
If at boot time I display the boot menu it shows this as SSD, HARD
DISK 1, HARD DISK 2
On 12/2/18 9:12 pm, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/11/2018 01:23 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/2/18 5:46 pm, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
grub2-install is not needed I think.
Thanks Francis, I'll check that out. Grub2-install is still req
On 12/2/18 12:50 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/11/2018 01:23 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/2/18 5:46 pm, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
grub2-install is not needed I think.
Thanks Francis, I'll check that out. Grub2-install is still required
to update the mbr on non-efi (legacy) sy
On 13/2/18 8:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 04:21, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet interfaces
running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected 1GBits/s.
I think some update has caused this to happen, probably about 5 days
On 13/2/18 8:43 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 13/2/18 8:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 04:21, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet
interfaces
running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected 1GBits/s.
I think some update has
On 14/2/18 12:34 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it was
an official Fedora one.
Understandable. IMO, they should be discouraged from using the "fedora" name
for
that very reason.
Hi Ed, just
On 13/2/18 11:51 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 13:36 +0100, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2018-02-13 kl. 13:14, skrev Ed Greshko:
On 02/13/18 19:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
3.0.0-rc5-0-gf53236af09)
Oh, you mention "fedora-multimedia". Is that an actual fedora sponsored r
On 14/2/18 7:55 am, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/13/2018 12:44 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just my 2 cents worth, I have the same setup as Patrick, and
like Patrick I use the negativo17 repositories for Nvidia (I found
rpmfusion to be not reliable enough with their binary files for
nvidia), but
On 13/2/18 9:42 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:46, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just further to this, on my system when the auto negotiate box is checked the
link
entry and the duplex entry are removed from the dialog.
Which makes perfect sense, right?
If the negotiation is automatic then
On 13/2/18 8:51 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this thread I've
checked my ethernet configuration and like Ter
On 15/2/18 4:33 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
I mistakenly installed the Gnome Desktop from a live DVD - my SSD is small,
and I want KDE, so I have burned a disk with the Spin. Problem now, though, is
that Fedora appears to have turned UEFI back on, and I can't find any way of
getting back to promo
On 14/2/18 8:59 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/14/18 05:23, Stephen Morris wrote:
I use Negativo17 because in the past I have found that rpmfusion were very tardy
with their Nvidia binary files in keeping pace with kernel version changes. I
have
all the negativo17 repositories enabled and all the
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
on my system.
The packages I have installed are:
bash-4.4$ rpm -qa vlc*
vlc-core-3.0.0-25.20180109git0c462fc
On 14/2/18 8:18 pm, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
On 12/2/18 9:12 pm, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Also, I don't know what grub2-install would do to a GPT formatted
disk.
You can specify "TARGET"
On 15/2/18 8:59 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 10:21 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/15/18 10:06, Tim wrote:
On 02/13/18 20:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. The repo name misled me into thinking it
was an official Fedora one.
Ed Greshko:
Understand
On 16/2/18 6:52 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So from my perspective the vlc package you had problems with works fine
on my system.
The packa
On 16/2/18 6:24 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/15/2018 04:15 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
Samual and Steve, When I installed Fedora I got the screen where you
can turn UEFI off. Since I wanted to promote the DVD drive over hard
disk boot, I turned it off. I thought that was permanent. However,
now
On 17/2/18 2:51 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
GOT IT! - In case someone else reads this thread, this is what you need to know.
If your function keys are marked in orange or blue, you need to hold down the
Fn key. From the Power menu, select Restart and, with the Fn key firmly down,
start tapping F2.
On 17/2/18 3:55 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 16:42 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 15:51 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
Well obviously you need to hold the Fn key :-) (I know, some things are
only obvious after the fact).
BTW, for future reference I recommend
On 17/2/18 3:36 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 14:51 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 10:17 +, Anne Wilson wrote:
This is *definitely* not necessary. The BIOS runs before the hard disk
is even read, so there has to be a way to catch it. As far as I can
t
On 17/2/18 5:02 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/15/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 16/2/18 6:52 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/14/2018 01:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 14/2/18 10:05 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 08:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
So fr
On 17/2/18 10:59 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/17/18 18:12, François Patte wrote:
I just updated f27 and the new installed kernel
(4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64), sends these messages at boot time:
kernel: Spectre V2 : Mitigation: Full generic retpoline
kernel: Spectre V2 : System may be vulnerable to s
On 18/2/18 8:28 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/18/18 05:12, François Patte wrote:
Le 17/02/2018 à 20:31, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 02/18/18 02:10, François Patte wrote:
returns that virtualbox drivers (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, vboxnetadp,
vboxpci) and nvidia driver were not compiled with a retpoline co
On 18/2/18 9:14 pm, François Patte wrote:
Le 18/02/2018 à 10:54, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 02/18/18 17:01, François Patte wrote:
$ strings
/usr/lib/modules/4.15.3-300.fc27.x86_64/extra/nvidia-340xx/nvidia.ko |
grep gcc
gcc version 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2) (GCC)
OK. I believe that RET
On 18/2/18 7:49 pm, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 18 February 2018, Robert P. J. Day sent:
currently perusing some linux courseware i'll be delivering later
this month, and i'm fascinated by the early claim that the "more" and
"less" commands can be used interchangeably. i don't recall th
On 18/2/18 7:45 pm, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 17 February 2018, Anne Wilson sent:
They don't linger long enough to write them down, and boot.log
appears to be empty (unless that's because I'm logged in as user, not
root).
The logging is done by the system, not you. Reading logs may req
On 20/2/18 3:51 am, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
On 14/2/18 8:18 pm, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Stephen Morris
wrote:
Thanks Tom. My statement was from having seen other threads on this
list saying to not run grub2-install on an efi
On 19/2/18 3:29 pm, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 19 February 2018, Stephen Morris sent:
Just following on from this, is my setup strange when I have never
found boot.log to be empty and on my system it currently has
mountains of entries?
Oops. The machine I'm working on now does h
Hi,
I'm using the nvidia drivers from negativo17. I have the nvidia
source module registered with dkms and it seems to be being compiled
when I get a new kernel, if that is the case what do I need to do to
resolve the following messages shown by "dmesg"?
[ 14.934074] nvidia: loading o
On 20/2/18 8:54 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/20/18 04:41, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm using the nvidia drivers from negativo17. I have the nvidia source
module
registered with dkms and it seems to be being compiled when I get a new kernel,
if
that is the case what do I need to do to re
On 20/2/18 7:43 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/19/2018 12:13 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I thought that with SB all your drivers etc had to be signed to be
able to boot from a SecureBoot system, and as such Fedora were using
Microsoft certificates, whereas Ubuntu was going down the path of
self
On 20/2/18 7:33 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/14/2018 01:51 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
It could be. As I understand it the default functionality updates the
mbr on the specified device, and from what I've read in other
threads, I thought they said that to get the grub menu displayed at
boo
On 20/2/18 7:39 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/12/2018 01:32 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Wouldn't grub2-install be used to install the boot sectors to the
/boot partition? This question is coming from the days when I
formatted an entire hard disk as GPT and tried to install an older
Fedora s
On 21/2/18 5:02 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/20/2018 01:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 20/2/18 7:39 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/12/2018 01:32 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Wouldn't grub2-install be used to install the boot sectors to the
/boot partition? This question is coming from the
On 22/2/18 7:43 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/21/2018 12:35 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
My question around the time I was installing, I think F26 from
scratch the first time on my 2 TB hard disk that now has both Fedora
and Ubuntu on it. As a trial I made the entire hard disk GPT. I then
ran the
On 20/2/18 7:41 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the nvidia drivers from negativo17. I have the nvidia
source module registered with dkms and it seems to be being compiled
when I get a new kernel, if that is the case what do I need to do to
resolve the following messages sho
On 23/2/18 8:59 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/23/18 05:27, Stephen Morris wrote:
From the responses I am getting it seems that the meaning of 'taints the
kernel'
has morphed into something else?
Here is the definitive list of what taints the kernel. This is from the 4.14
documentat
On 23/2/18 9:04 am, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/22/2018 01:27 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
From the responses I am getting it seems that the meaning of 'taints
the kernel' has morphed into something else?
Here's my understanding of it from when I had nVidia graphics. Let's
On 24/2/18 2:25 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/24/18 10:21, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 23/2/18 8:59 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/23/18 05:27, Stephen Morris wrote:
From the responses I am getting it seems that the meaning of 'taints the
kernel'
has morphed into something else?
H
On 24/2/18 3:43 pm, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/2/18 2:25 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/24/18 10:21, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 23/2/18 8:59 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/23/18 05:27, Stephen Morris wrote:
From the responses I am getting it seems that the meaning of
'taints the kernel&
On 24/2/18 11:12 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/24/18 12:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed. Is there any documentation anywhere on what each bit represents?
You mean other than the URL I've supplied at kernel.org and the comments within
tainted.c ?
I haven't seen tainted.c as yet
On 25/2/18 12:15 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 15:43 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Are all these taint messages, and all the reasons for a taint message
being produced saying that if we have to build our own drivers into the
kernel to be able to use our hardware
On 25/2/18 1:03 am, bruce wrote:
Hi.
Have a bunch of files with the basic naming of:
ztcloud_nfs_parseztaa_1__WGS_7500_001__parse.dat
ztcloud_nfs_parseztaa_1__WGS_7500_002__parse.dat
etc..
I'd like to simply remove the 1st part ztcloud_nfs_parsezt from the
files, renaming the files to the rest
On 25/2/18 1:21 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/25/18 09:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/2/18 11:12 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/24/18 12:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed. Is there any documentation anywhere on what each bit represents?
You mean other than the URL I've supplied at kerne
On 25/2/18 1:21 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/25/18 09:46, Stephen Morris wrote:
[ 10.395281] razermouse: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[ 10.395344] razermouse: module verification failed: signature and/or required
key missing - tainting kernel
[ 10.874905] nvidia: module
Hi,
Has anybody seen these messages before and know what is causing
them, and hence why yumex is getting them? These are potentially new
since the last system update.
(, DBusException('Rejected send
message, 2 matched rules; type="method_call", sender=":1.107" (uid=1000
pid=3908 comm="
On 26/2/18 1:12 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 13:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 25/2/18 12:15 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 15:43 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Are all these taint messages, and all the reasons for a taint message
bein
On 26/2/18 7:55 am, John Pilkington wrote:
On 25/02/18 20:37, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody seen these messages before and know what is causing
them, and hence why yumex is getting them? These are potentially new
since the last system update.
(, DBusException('Rejected
Hi,
I have forgotten whether I'm running gdm or kdm, and I've forgotten
where to look to find out, but since the last system update I did two
days ago, when the display manager is displaying the list of user who
can log in, cursor movements and mouse movements lag something cronic,
but wh
On 26/2/18 9:50 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/26/18 18:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
ll /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service will point to what you're
using.
systemctl status display-manager
also will tell you
Thanks Ed, that tells me I'm using gdm. I might be getting confused with
Ubuntu,
On 28/2/18 7:46 am, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/27/2018 12:37 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm not using sddm because when I tried it, I didn't like its
presentation layer, and the same applies to kdm.
Have you tried lightdm?
If I remember correctly, I think in F25 or F26 lightdm was t
On 28/2/18 10:11 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/28/18 04:37, Stephen Morris wrote:
I might be getting confused with Ubuntu, but I thought there was a .conf file
somewhere that held the specification of the default display manager that could
easily be edited to swap between any of the available
On 2/3/18 4:45 am, Jon LaBadie wrote:
I had very slow logins from sddm and lightdm.
Not as bad from gdm, but still not good.
My culprit was staring an Xvnc server gnome
session from my Mate autostart. Clue was
50 gnome processes I owned after logging
into a Mate session.
jl
My issue starts
On 3/3/18 9:01 am, David A. De Graaf wrote:
On 02/27/18 17:04, François Patte wrote:
Le 25/02/2018 à 19:42, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour.
I try to configure a printer on my local network but all attemps fail.
I have a printer attached to one computer on an usb port and I want to
use it wi
On 4/3/18 11:37 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/04/18 08:25, Stephen Morris wrote:
My issue starts with gdm, with gnome shell taking up to 800% of the cpu and
causing, ctrl+alt+F2 to switch to another login to time out, and if I launch
gnome
from gdm the issue with gnome shell continues and causes
On 04/03/2018 13:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/04/18 09:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, I tried Gnome under Wayland and Xorg and as documented in the problem
description, even though gnome shell lags with gdm, when gnome under Xorg is
started the lag disappears. The only difference in my
On 5/3/18 5:40 am, stan wrote:
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 16:26:10 +0100
Jeandet Alexis wrote:
I tried to add XKBOPTIONS="ctrl:nocaps" in /etc/default/keyboard.
This won't work for wayland. You would have to run X.
I'm using Gnome with Wayland. Any idea?
Stop using wayland. This is an area of
On 5/3/18 12:08 am, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
* When rhythmbox finishes playing an episode, what does it play
next? If it's playing from the queue and there is another episode
on the queue, that plays next. If it's the last item on the queue,
it's not clear: sometimes rhythmbox play
On 4/3/18 9:02 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/04/18 16:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, I made that change and it rectified the lagging issues with gdm and
gnome. Now to work out why dkms hasn't compiled the nvidia driver under the new
kernel.
FWIW, the lagging issues may be a byprodu
On 5/3/18 12:55 pm, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
While it mostly works, this specific command fails:
$ dnf provides '*/Droid Sans*'
This is consistent, and also happens on a second machine. Both run f27
fully updated.
The following does work:
$ dnf provides '*/Droid*'
But this one crashes:
$ dn
On 6/3/18 5:24 am, David A. De Graaf wrote:
On 03/03/18 20:20, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 3/3/18 9:01 am, David A. De Graaf wrote:
The cups system in Fedora 27 has taken a giant step backward from
prior versions in that browsing no longer works automatically. In
F26, if the cups-browsed
On 5/3/18 7:36 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/05/18 04:18, Stephen Morris wrote:
As a matter of interest, which version of the nvidia drivers are you using?
390.25-3 And I don't use wayland as performance in KDE is horrible
From the negativo17 repositories I'm using the source co
On 6/3/18 11:24 am, Tim wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 07:44 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Have you considered implementing the other Microsoft way, which I'm
not sure how to do as I'm not a network technician but which a number
of organizations tend to do, and that is when the cli
On 9/3/18 6:13 am, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
... ah, so the replacement of those cross-directory hardlinks with
symlinks will happen in F28, is that what you're saying?
The change will be in F28, yes. The few files in /usr/bin
are simply copied, not symlinked. Within /usr/
On 9/3/18 9:11 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 07:59 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
It is my understanding that currently when a file copied to any
location, a physical copy is not produced, the copy is a hardlink to the
original file, until such time as one of the &q
Hi,
I use an Asus Geforce GTX 1070 nvidia card with 8 GB of memory. I
am also using the nvidia driver source from negativo17 for version
390.25. Within Nvidia X Server Configuration I have selected FXAA
Antialiasing within the opengl settings and that has caused an issue in
my F27 impleme
On 10/3/18 4:00 pm, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:19 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
ro
On 11/3/18 8:31 am, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/10/2018 01:04 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
ro
On 11/3/18 4:35 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
No, what I was mentioning here is what I have read as standard linux
functionality with copying, when a file is copied, and it doesn't matter
where to, rather than create a 2nd copy of the file
On 11/3/18 10:15 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 11/3/18 8:31 am, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/10/2018 01:04 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLE
On 11/3/18 1:09 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/11/18 09:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
I can't find the documentation any more, but I have found documentation on how
to
use copy the create the target as a hard link or as a soft link. It is possible
I
have incorrectly remembered what I had read,
On 11/3/18 7:24 pm, Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 08:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have my home multifunction device connected to my router, so it is
effectively a network device.
I suppose should be really specific and say, is that an ethernet (or
WiFi) connection between printer and
On 12/3/18 10:48 am, Philip Rhoades wrote:
JD, Gordon, Robert,
On 2018-03-12 06:13, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/11/2018 01:48 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I started deleting GBs of stuff from:
/dev/sdb1 /backup
but df did not reduce from 95% so I looked more closely and found
this we
On 12/3/18 11:29 am, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/11/2018 07:19 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 12/3/18 10:48 am, Philip Rhoades wrote:
JD, Gordon, Robert,
On 2018-03-12 06:13, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/11/2018 01:48 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I started deleting GBs of stuff from
On 12/3/18 1:41 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/12/18 09:41, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Robert, so basically what you are saying is that if you use that
parameter,
the output is rounded up to the nearest integer representation (in this case
Gig)
rather than displaying it as a fraction? For
On 12/3/18 10:11 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 21:41 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, this functionality seems to be counter intuitive to me. Given
that du shows space used in sub-directories, it seems to me the only
useful output is du without any parameters.
On 13/3/18 8:10 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 04:26, Stephen Morris wrote:
Just further to this is it a bug with du that the -a parameter which is
supposed to
list all files not just directories, does not list files prefixed with a '.'?:
Of course not.
Compare the -a opt of ls
On 13/3/18 9:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:20, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, I'll check the doco out, I was just expecting the command to do
exactly
what the help info said, output the information for all files, not just a
subset.
It
On 14/3/18 7:19 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 13/3/18 9:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:20, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, I'll check the doco out, I was just expecting the
command to do exactly
what the help info said, output the informatio
On 13/3/18 9:33 am, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 03/12/2018 03:26 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Patrick, taking this a step further, it seems to me that the
only parameter for du that, to me, provides the correct file size is
-b as shown below. I am listing my Desktop directory via ll, du -hs
On 14/3/18 7:42 am, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 03/13/2018 01:19 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 13/3/18 9:05 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/13/18 05:20, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Ed, I'll check the doco out, I was just expecting the command
to do exactly
On 13/3/18 8:46 pm, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 18:25 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 03/12/2018 03:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 07:26 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
'du' with no parameters recursively lists all the subdirecto
On 14/3/18 4:50 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 03/13/2018 01:19 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
It just seems counter intuitive to me to have to issue another
command (even if one knows of its existence) to get a command to
function "properly".
Having read this thread, I think you may
Hi,
I've just attempted to do a sudo dnf upgrade to install the 343
updates that are available, and after downloading all the packages it
got a GPG error and terminated. Has anyone else seen this and is able to
provide some guidance on what I need to look at to identify why?
[SKIPPED] vu
On 17/3/18 9:44 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/17/18 18:26, Ed Greshko wrote:
Package flash-plugin-29.0.0.113-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm is not signed
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error:
On 18/3/18 1:06 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/17/18 21:51, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 17/3/18 9:44 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/17/18 18:26, Ed Greshko wrote:
Package flash-plugin-29.0.0.113-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm is not signed
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
On 18/3/18 12:02 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/18/18 08:41, Stephen Morris wrote:
When I used dnfdragora to remove the 28.0.0 version from negativo17 and install
the
29.0.0 version from Adobe's repository, it told me the Adobe version was a
downgrade from the installed version, which I d
On 18/3/18 2:49 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
Well, you very well may have the keys for Negativo17 but
it is just that whoever is the maintainer missed signing
the RPM as the error states.
FWIW, the maintainer at negativo17.org said this error has
been corrected (in the comment se
On 20/3/18 5:54 am, CLOSE Dave wrote:
Fedora 27 x86_64. When DNF installs a new kernel, it isn't going into
the right place (/boot) and is not detected by GRUB. Why not?
For example, after installing the most recent new kernel, I see this.
[root@machine ~]# ls /boot
7725dfc225d14958a625ddaaaea5
On 19/3/18 9:55 am, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/18 06:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I have a ~/.pulse directory. Within it there is a file called
741a5ee204e44a41982409c7e07d04de-default-sink which contains
Oh, strangely?, I found that on one system the directory was ~/.pulse while
another
has
On 19/3/18 12:54 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/19/18 09:42, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Mine gave the same pop up. I selected the default storage device.
I did not think of trying a music device.
I do not know if we are getting the same Pop-Up. Mine read...
An MTP connection will be established to acc
On 20/3/18 8:05 am, CLOSE Dave wrote:
Further information from another attempt a few minutes ago. Could the
broken pipe be the problem? What could cause that? /boot is at 52%.
I don't think the broken pipe is causing the issue, I'll need to check
next time there's a new kernel, as when I run t
On 21/3/18 7:24 am, CLOSE Dave wrote:
Roger Heflin wrote:
I would run this and see where rpm thinks they should be since they
are not in /boot
rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i vmlinuz
Evidently, RPM thinks they should be in /boot (as I would expect):
$ rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i vmlinuz
1 - 100 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
