On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 07:58:33AM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Anyone know of a source that gives the number of
> users of Fedora vs CentOS vs RHEL?
For Fedora specifically, there's this:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/mirrors-countme
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM / R
> I don't have a computer to test with right now, but I'm pretty sure
> system-upgrade doesn't put the packages in there. So at most you will be
> merely copying the repo data across.
Actually, this is correct -- system-upgrade puts them in
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade, not in /var/cache/dnf. Cop
ot;
afterwards. This is definitely the correct approach, thanks.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 04:10 AM, Michal Domonkos wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't have a computer to test with right now, but I'm pretty sure
>>> system-up
> worked as expected -- it didn't download anything
Actually, "it didn't re-download any of the cached packages" would be
the correct wording here.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@li
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Try using package-cleanup --dupes or whatever the dnf version is and find out
> if
> that's an issue.
I'd just add that the dnf equivalent is "dnf repoquery --duplicated"
(http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cli_vs_yum.html).
--
users mailing li
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Taking my cursory look at the system-upgrade plugin, it appears that it
> looks at the file I mentioned to figure out which version it currently
> is and where you want it to go. I've never dug through it that closely,
> but that seems to be
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>
> Dear Experts,
> I've a Fedora 23 installed on my laptop and I keep it updated (even if
> I'm not going through the upgrade process yet).
>
> Yesteday when I checked which packages need to be updated, dnf proposed
> me to install this pack
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> It looks like something that is being updated is pulling in the yum
> package as a dependency. As Tom mentioned, you can find out by trying
> to remove yum, or even better, by running "dnf repoquery --installed
> -
Cool, hope that everything keeps working for you.
However, I'd second Gordon in that, IMO, you shouldn't need to run
system-upgrade to get the final release if you already installed F24
Beta (just "dnf upgrade" should get you there), see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_pre-release_t
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Michal Domonkos wrote:
>
>> It looks like something that is being updated is pulling in the yum
>> package as a dependency. As Tom mentioned, you can find out by trying
>> to remove yum, or even
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users
wrote:
> I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to
> the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they
> appear to have gone to great lengths to avoid leaking any
> identifiable information. See this link:
>
>
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote:
> 1) the age of the installation (one of 4 values, see the link above)
Oh, just a little correction - there were some later changes made to
that man page (the age "buckets" in particular) that are not reflected
in the linked
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:47 PM Michal Domonkos wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:15 PM stan via users
> wrote:
> > I think the answer to your question is that the variable is sent to
> > the mirror, so yes, a mirror will receive the flag. However, they
> > appear to
13 matches
Mail list logo
