My Canon scanner used to work with Fedora 19 Beta and Fedora 18 but
it seems my fresh 19 installation is not co-operating.
lsussb sees it :
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:000
On 07/18/2013 01:02 AM, fedora wrote:
what about
scanimage -L
suomi
On 2013-07-18 03:47, Frank wrote:
My Canon scanner used to work with Fedora 19 Beta and Fedora 18 but
it seems my fresh 19 installation is not co-operating.
lsussb sees it :
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux
I have an extra kernel in /boot with a bizarre name:
vmlinuz-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720
It has a matching initramfs.
initramfs-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720.img
I am running 19.
They don't show up in a query of the rpm database
Can anyone tell me what they are
On 07/19/2013 12:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/19/13 11:51, Frank wrote:
I have an extra kernel in /boot with a bizarre name:
vmlinuz-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720
It has a matching initramfs.
initramfs-0-rescue-9388a5eb453d59f4fd98567b37061720.img
I am running 19.
They
Saw this error this morning during a Yum update:
Total size: 20 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
Downloading packages:
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction check error:
file /usr/lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin from install of
linux-firmware-20130724-27.git31f6b30.
On 07/28/2013 12:23 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:55 +0200
lee wrote:
Marko Vojinovic writes:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:58:24 +0200
lee wrote:
Hmm I disabled it now and will see what happens. There are 224
packages depending on the avahi package --- that's insane for
so
On 28/07/13 05:41 PM, lee wrote:
Joe Zeff writes:
On 07/28/2013 08:03 AM, lee wrote:
However, when I look at online dictionaries, they say that "disabled"
refers to people the abilities of which are somehow limited, so that
word won't be applicable here at all. Services are not people, and i
I have been having some minor problems with grub2 lately - grub
is installed in /dev/sda the only HD on this machine.
When the grub menu comes up after a boot/reboot I cannot select
certain items as the selection bar just skips by them. Usually
I can select them if I start at the bottom and then
On 02/08/2013 4:19 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/02/2013 11:36 AM, Frank issued this missive:
I have been having some minor problems with grub2 lately - grub
is installed in /dev/sda the only HD on this machine.
When the grub menu comes up after a boot/reboot I cannot select
certain items as
On 08/11/2013 07:52 PM, Jim wrote:
On 08/11/2013 07:32 PM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 08/11/2013 06:54 PM, Jim wrote:
I have retreved the Thunderbird folder from a crashed WindowsXP and now
have it on a Fedora 18 /home/user install.
The Fedora install already has Thunderbird installed
I disable
these services? What;s the best way to do that. Even so the time they
take doesn't account for the 6-7 second delay after booting before
lightdm comes up.
Thanks for any help
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo systemd-analyze blame
19.698s NetworkManager.service
1
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
screen.
///snip///
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo systemd-analyze blame
On 08/13/2013 02:50 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:00:33PM -0400, Frank wrote:
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up
On 08/13/2013 05:28 PM, poma wrote:
Dana 13.08.2013 20:00, Frank je napisao:
On 08/13/2013 01:24 PM, poma wrote:
On 13.08.2013 18:49, Frank wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit Fedora
19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with the login
On 13/08/13 08:40 PM, Roger wrote:
So32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's
cracked up to be :)
Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it outI doubt anyone here can -
I've been following your various and sundry suggestions to users
closely and you are usually close to,
On 08/13/2013 10:07 PM, Frank wrote:
On 13/08/13 08:40 PM, Roger wrote:
So32-bit software on a 64-bit CPU sometimes may not be all it's
cracked up to be :)
Boy, Poma, if you can't figure it outI doubt anyone here can -
I've been following your various and sundry
On 08/14/2013 05:02 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 01:13, Frank wrote:
…
Is this worth submitting a bug ??
First check whether it's a 'lightdm-gtk-greeter' issue,
yum install lightdm-razorqt
alternatives --config lightdm-greeter
systemctl restart lightdm
No...it's som
On 08/14/2013 10:14 AM, poma wrote:
lspci -nnk | grep VGA -A2
[frank@localhost ~]$ lspci -nnk | grep VGA -A2
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82Q963/Q965
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2992] (rev 02)
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:01da]
Kernel
On 08/14/2013 10:14 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 15:11, Frank wrote:
On 08/14/2013 05:02 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 01:13, Frank wrote:
…
Is this worth submitting a bug ??
First check whether it's a 'lightdm-gtk-greeter' issue,
yum install lightdm-razorqt
alternatives -
On 08/14/2013 11:33 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 13 August 2013 18:49, Frank mailto:bea...@videotron.ca>> wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit
Fedora 19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with
the login screen.
Can someone
On 08/14/2013 11:51 AM, Frank wrote:
On 08/14/2013 11:33 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 13 August 2013 18:49, Frank mailto:bea...@videotron.ca>> wrote:
Since I made the switch to a 64 bit machine (still using 32 bit
Fedora 19) there is a long delay just before lightdm comes up with
On 08/14/2013 02:15 PM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 17:35, Frank wrote:
On 08/14/2013 10:14 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 15:11, Frank wrote:
On 08/14/2013 05:02 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.08.2013 01:13, Frank wrote:
…
Is this worth submitting a bug ??
First check whether it's a 'l
rther testing, you can also try the following:
systemctl mask accounts-daemon.service
Ditto. Delay remains
And of course, perform tests gradually s'il vous plaît, so can be seen
where the bunny is - 1st intel, 2nd accountsservice, …
You must be running out of ideas by now :)
Rega
On 08/14/2013 03:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/14/2013 09:07 AM, Frank wrote:
Re-enabled lightdm, and we are back to a 25 sec delay before it comes
up.
I really don't know what to do next.I can "solve" my problem by going
back to lxdm, but I really prefer the lightdm inter
On 08/14/2013 08:27 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/14/2013 04:55 PM, Frank wrote:
Only took a minute..but it didn't solve the problem.
Even cutting down the delay is better than nothing. After moving from
F17 to F19 lightdm had a long delay, both in coming up and in getting to
a respo
On 08/15/2013 04:19 AM, poma wrote:
On 15.08.2013 01:53, Frank wrote:
On 08/14/2013 07:02 PM, poma wrote:
To opt out of the equation an Xorg driver for Intel integrated graphics
chipsets - man 4 intel, you can try the following:
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg
linux …nomodeset
Didn't
d. What effect does adding sleep to
lightdm.service produce ?? I think I am missing the point :)
Regards
Frank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapro
On 08/15/2013 08:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 15.08.2013 20:10, Frank wrote:
With all due respect, I don't understand what's going on here---my
network manager is not disabled. What effect does adding sleep to
lightdm.service produce ?? I think I am missing the point :)
Regards
Frank
slow loading of lightdmI
tried bootchart from the kernel command line. The problem is it hard
locks-up lightdm when its loaded. Next boot I find nothing in /run/log.
I tried changing the output directory to $HOME...still nothing there.
Any bootchart experts here ??
Regards
Frank
--
users
access without a password.
YMMV.
Regards
Frank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedora
On 08/23/2013 04:32 PM, Jim wrote:
On 08/23/2013 02:07 PM, Frank wrote:
On 23/08/13 12:47 PM, Jim wrote:
On 08/23/2013 02:09 AM, g wrote:
hello jim,
"this tape will self destruct if yum quits" ;=)
On 08/22/2013 05:23 PM, Jim wrote:
fedora 18 / KDE
I have problems star
ad hits, but you need to to see if
any of it falls close to your problem.
There is no section header in my yumex.conf file. The first line is
"yumex" then comes various keywords.
Regards
Frank
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscriptio
On 08/23/2013 09:33 PM, g wrote:
On 08/23/2013 08:19 PM, Frank wrote:
<>
There is no section header in my yumex.conf file. The first line is
"yumex" then comes various keywords.
do you have "yumex" or "[yumex]"?
[yumex]
is it preceded
Received this from Yum a short time ago.
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Update notice FEDORA-2013-14172 (from updates-testing) is broken, or a
bad duplicate, skipping.
You should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing
On 08/24/2013 12:37 PM, g wrote:
On 08/24/2013 09:26 AM, Frank wrote:
On 08/23/2013 09:33 PM, g wrote:
On 08/23/2013 08:19 PM, Frank wrote:
<<>>
There is no section header in my yumex.conf file. The first
line is
"yumex" then comes various keywords.
Hi all
Got this this morning...is it a problem on my end or theirs?
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (from updates-testing) is broken, or a
bad duplicate, skipping.
You should report this problem to the
On 09/18/2013 09:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.09.2013 15:39, schrieb Frank:
Got this this morning...is it a problem on my end or theirs?
"should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing repository"
is pretty clear, see below, "yum upgrade" works wi
I have several desktops installed on my 19 install, including Cinnamon
and Mate.
I noticed this morning for the first time that a reboot from Cinnamon hangs.
I end up with a blank screen and one line at the time which as I recall
mentions
reboot and some numbers.
Does anyone have a clue as to
On 02/10/13 07:28 PM, John Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 08:55:50AM -0400, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
I just installed the latest kernel, and subsequently the latest
akmod-nvidia drivers from testing. Whenever I boot into XFCE and
then choose to reboot, it goes to a black screen w
On 04/10/13 08:00 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 10/02/2013 09:53 PM, Frank wrote:
On 02/10/13 07:28 PM, John Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 08:55:50AM -0400, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca
wrote:
I just installed the latest kernel, and subsequently the latest
akmod-nvidia drivers
While updating my Fedora 19 system today using check-update I discovered
this:
** Found 1 pre-existing rpm db problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
cronie-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686 is a duplicate with cronie-1.4.10-6.fc19.i686
[root@localhost frank]#
It seems a few weeks ago Yum at
On 06/10/13 05:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
rpm -qa | grep cronie
[root@localhost frank]# rpm -qa | grep cronie
cronie-1.4.10-6.fc19.i686
cronie-anacron-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686
cronie-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686
[root@localhost frank]#
Package cleanup didn't work.
[root@localhost frank]# package-cl
On 06/10/13 05:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 17:07:13 -0400, Frank wrote:
While updating my Fedora 19 system today using check-update I discovered
this:
** Found 1 pre-existing rpm db problem(s), 'yum check' output follows:
cronie-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686 is a dupl
On 06/10/13 05:23 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/06/2013 02:07 PM, Frank wrote:
What's the best way to resolve this ?
package-cleanup --cleandupes
As noted earlier this didn't work.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On 06/10/13 05:34 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.10.2013 23:31, schrieb Frank:
On 06/10/13 05:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
rpm -qa | grep cronie
[root@localhost frank]# rpm -qa | grep cronie
cronie-1.4.10-6.fc19.i686
cronie-anacron-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686
cronie-1.4.10-7.fc19.i686
[root@localhost
On 08/10/13 10:20 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 10/05/2013 10:53 AM, Frank wrote:
On 04/10/13 08:00 AM, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
On 10/02/2013 09:53 PM, Frank wrote:
On 02/10/13 07:28 PM, John Schmitt wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 08:55:50AM -0400, linuxnuts
Updated my 19 installation this morning and ran into errors again.
This is from yum's log:
Oct 11 09:42:09 Updated: gnupg2-2.0.22-1.fc19.i686
Oct 11 09:42:10 Updated: usbmuxd-1.0.8-10.fc19.i686
Oct 11 09:42:11 Updated: psacct-6.6.1-7.fc19.i686
Oct 11 09:42:11 Updated: libtar-1.2.11-26.fc19.i686
On 11/10/13 10:22 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/11/2013 04:02 PM, Frank wrote:
Updated my 19 installation this morning and ran into errors again.
This is from yum's log:
Oct 11 09:42:25 psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686: ts_done name in te is
usbmuxd should be psacct-6.6.1-6.fc19.i686
Oct 11
In checking my logs I have noticed there have not been any updates to
Fedora 19
since October 12th. Or am I experiencing some sort of problem ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On 17/10/13 11:53 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:52:04 -0400
Frank wrote:
In checking my logs I have noticed there have not been any updates to
Fedora 19
since October 12th. Or am I experiencing some sort of problem ?
There should be a push out later today...
kevin
On 17/10/13 11:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.10.2013 17:52, schrieb Frank:
In checking my logs I have noticed there have not been any updates to Fedora 19
since October 12th. Or am I experiencing some sort of problem?
what says "yum clean all && yum upgrade" in a r
I am trying to compile the FocusBlue plugin for GIMP on Fedora 19.
The make file spits out this error when linking:
/usr/bin/ld: diffusion.o: undefined reference to symbol 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0' is defined in DSO /lib/libm.so.6 so
try adding it to the linker comm
On 03/11/13 03:59 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:55:18 -0500, Frank wrote:
I am trying to compile the FocusBlue plugin for GIMP on Fedora 19.
The make file spits out this error when linking:
/usr/bin/ld: diffusion.o: undefined reference to symbol 'expf@@GLIBC_2.0&
On 06/11/13 02:17 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
11/06/2013 11:09 AM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
People I find
offensive I simply filter out and never see them. It would seem others
would do the same ...
+1
I hope we haven't lost a "diamond in the rough".
+1 even though I someti
On 04/12/13 03:47 PM, ergodic wrote:
OK I am 82. My first Fedora Core install was FC-3 and before that Red Hat 4 if
my memory does not trick me.
Today running in different boxes, F-18, F-19, F-20beta.
Multibooting Debian Wheezy, F-19 and Windows 8.1.
My most sincere thanks to all the developer
Just tried to update my Fedora 19 with yum check-update. It seems
every mirror has a problem:
http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/fedora/linux/updates/19/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for updates
Trying other mirror.
ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/li
On 07/12/13 07:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/08/13 08:03, Frank wrote:
Just tried to update my Fedora 19 with yum check-update. It seems
every mirror has a problem:
http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/fedora/linux/updates/19/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match
On 07/12/13 07:25 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Ed Greshko writes:
On 12/08/13 08:03, Frank wrote:
Just tried to update my Fedora 19 with yum check-update. It seems
every mirror has a problem:
http://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/fedora/linux/updates/19/i386/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno -1
I am trying to compile/install IceWm for my Fedora 32 installation. Ran
into some problems I have resolved, but
I am stumped by these:
checking for strlcat... no
checking for C++11 by default... yes
checking for CORE... no
configure: error: Package requirements (fontconfig xrender xcomposite
xd
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 14:00 -0500, fred smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:51:35AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> > > Just wondering, whether it's possible to have more fine-grained
> > control
> > > over key repeats when held down.
> > >
> > >
I would like some help/opinions installing Fedora 19 on a new computer
which came with Windows 7 installed.
I have shrunk the Windows partition to 40 gigs ( it's an 80 gig hd) and now
have 4 partitions, two devoted to Windows and two empty ones...I plan to
put Fedora
in one of them.
Windows st
On 06/07/2013 10:42 PM, Doug wrote:
On 07/07/2013 01:12 AM, Frank wrote:
I would like some help/opinions installing Fedora 19 on a new computer
which came with Windows 7 installed.
I have shrunk the Windows partition to 40 gigs ( it's an 80 gig hd) and now
have 4 partitions, two devot
I am running a freshly updated Fedora 31. I noticed this morning that
the systemd-modules-load.service failed. I saw it on boot
and later in the journal log.
There is no explanation why it failed, just the notification.
[frank@franklin ~]$ systemctl status systemd-modules-load.service
I recently installed Fedora 31 and dicovered today I have no sound
output at all.
Pavucontrol reports no hardware output devices available.
[frank@franklin ~]$ amixer
Simple mixer control 'Master',0
Capabilities: pvolume pswitch pswitch-joined
Playback channels: Front Left - F
Error at this end. Sorry for the noise. Sound is back.
I recently installed Fedora 31 and dicovered today I have no sound
output at all.
Pavucontrol reports no hardware output devices available.
[frank@franklin ~]$ amixer
Simple mixer control 'Master',0
Capabilitie
I am blocked upgrading my 31 to 32. Updated 31, and did the "sudo dnf
system-upgrade download --releasever=32 --allowerasing". It dl 1.2 gigs of
packages, and at the very end told me rxvt was being blocked because of
a conflict with the newer version.
I then ran "sudo dnf system-upgrade reboo
erase rxvt and upgrade. Then, after the system comes back with F32, dnf
install rxvt. Of course, this assumes that you have some terminal window option.
HTH,
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
On Sun, 3 May 2020 12:24:22 -0400 Frank wrote:
I am blocked upgrading my 31 to 32. Updated 31, and
I know this is not the proper list for the Workstation pre-release. Can
someone tell me
what would be the proper list to ask questions on ?
Thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis
On 2021-03-10 3:30 p.m., Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/03/2021 04:11, Frank wrote:
I know this is not the proper list for the Workstation pre-release.
Can someone tell me
what would be the proper list to ask questions on ?
Do you actually mean Fedora Workstation 34 (the next release).
Or, Fedora
On 2021-03-10 3:37 p.m., Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:11:01PM -0500, Frank wrote:
I know this is not the proper list for the Workstation pre-release.
Can someone tell me
what would be the proper list to ask questions on ?
Test list for debugging issues:
* https
problem. It seems
when sound stops working, logging out and back in solves the problem.
The other problem is xscreen-saver has stopped working. I suspect it's been
integrated into systemd as there are a bunch of config files which
didn't exist before.
[frank@localhost ~]$ inx
On 2021-05-01 3:08 p.m., Matti Pulkkinen wrote:
la, 2021-05-01 kello 14:52 -0400, Frank kirjoitti:
Upgraded Fedora 33 to 34 yesterday following the Fedora
recommendations.
It went well but today I noticed two small problems.
Every once in a while sound stops working...pulse audio show no
I noticed this morning that network manager is spamming my log with
messages repeated every 3 or 4 seconds.
Jun 06 11:58:22 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[787]:
[1622995102.8297] policy: set-hostname: current hostname was changed
outside NetworkManager: fedora
Jun 06 11:58:22 localh
a/513413/452882
On 06/06/2021 17:19, Frank wrote:
I noticed this morning that network manager is spamming my log with
messages repeated every 3 or 4 seconds.
Jun 06 11:58:22 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[787]:
[1622995102.8297] policy: set-hostname: current hostname was c
On 2021-06-07 1:01 a.m., Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 12:19 -0400, Frank wrote:
I noticed this morning that network manager is spamming my log with
messages repeated every 3 or 4 seconds.
Jun 06 11:58:22 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[787]:
[1622995102.8297] policy: set
On 2021-06-07 1:01 a.m., Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 12:19 -0400, Frank wrote:
I noticed this morning that network manager is spamming my log with
messages repeated every 3 or 4 seconds.
Jun 06 11:58:22 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[787]:
[1622995102.8297] policy: set
On 2021-06-07 10:30 a.m., Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 10:20 AM Frank wrote:
I noticed this morning that network manager is spamming my log with
messages repeated every 3 or 4 seconds.
Jun 06 11:58:22 localhost.localdomain NetworkManager[787]:
[1622995102.8297] policy: set
bove query.
I can't tell now as I have changed the hostname.
Frank:
Here's the situation this morning. Following a suggestion from John
Quirke
I added a line to /etc/NetManager/NetManager.conf hostname-mode=none.
That has stopped the repeated logging, but now when I click on the
ne
My provider **seems** to have fixed the problem. This is a check.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pr
Switched to gmail from my provider. Please ignore
--
Frank McCormick in Montreal
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On 2021-11-18 3:43 p.m., linux guy wrote:
As you can read about in another thread, the home directories on one
of my Fedora 35 computers were deleted using rm -rf. These
directories are located on an EXT4 LVM.
How should I proceed to try to restore this data ?
Thanks
You could try some o
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:22:05 +0100 Ger van Dijck wrote:
> Hi Fedora people,
>
> When booting my system Fedora 27 (fully updated) I get the message RfK111
> State requires privileges.
Same here. Really annoying for bluetooth usage.
Cheers,
ook the following URL:
>
> https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?314785-After-Upgrade-to-F26-Always-asked-for-root-password-on-login-(additionally)
>
> Maybe this will help you.
The pointer to blueberry in this thread was really the solution.
Hot thanx.
Cheers,
Frank
t belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package vlc-3.0.2-1.fc27.i686
[root@siffux dnf]#
Any hint to solve this issue?
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Tue, 29 May 2018 00:54:13 -0700 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/29/2018 12:49 AM, Frank Elsner wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've a F27 system which is fully updated by "dnf update" and ran into this
> > problem
> > when trying to upgrade to F28:
On Tue, 29 May 2018 10:02:26 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2018 00:54:13 -0700 Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 05/29/2018 12:49 AM, Frank Elsner wrote:
[ ... ]
> > > Problem: package vlc-3.0.2-1.fc27.i686 requires libavcodec.so.57, but
> > > none of the
# dnf --refresh install vlc
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Tue 29 May 2018 11:35:49 AM CEST.
No match for argument: vlc
Error: Unable to find a match
The rpmfusion repos are enabled and yumex offers vlc for installation.
Cheers,
Frank
__
On Tue, 29 May 2018 17:43:01 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/29/18 17:38, Frank Elsner wrote:
> > I did it, but if I try reinstall get
> >
> > # dnf --refresh install vlc
> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Tue 29 May 2018 11:35:49 AM
> > CES
vlc-devel.i686 3.0.2-1.fc27
rpmfusion-free-updates
vlc-extras.i686 3.0.2-1.fc27
rpmfusion-free-updates
As You assumed :-)
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing
On Tue, 29 May 2018 18:18:16 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
[ ... ]
> Have you added an "exclude" in your /etc/dnf/dnf.conf by any chance?
I have. Don't ask my why and when. Totally forgotten.
Thanks to you for helping me to make the upgrade going.
Have a nice week.
Chee
Hello,
I've two (I think identically configured) Fedora 27 systems with MATE dsktop.
On both systems a SD card gets mounted after insertion but only one system
shows an icon on the desktop.
What might be the reason and what to do to get the icon displayed?
Cheers,
-acpi.brightness_enable=1
What has changed? How can I get suspend working again?
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org
r the suspend option on the
login screen or I've haven't found it until now.
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 23:19:51 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/02/2018 10:40 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
> > Many thanks for telling me that I'm not alone.
> > Unfortunatly my MATE desktop doesn't offer the suspend option on the
> > login screen or I've haven
28. This specific notebook (Lenovo x120e) last
> had F22 installed.
I've a similiar problem with 4.17.x kernels on my TP X230i with F27 inslalled.
With the 4.16.x kernels suspend works perfect but with the 4.17.x kernels
this has stopped working. Screen is blanked but the system doe
75 k
Transaction Summary
==
Skip 1 Package
How to overcome this problem?
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:55:11 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
[ ... ]
> You could either wait a day or so or do the following
State "waiting" entered. Thanks.
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
arget: Bound to unit
systemd-suspend.service, but unit isn't active.
Jul 23 11:07:21 siffux systemd[1]: Dependency failed for Suspend.
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:30:00 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:18:28 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > As I mentioned elsewhere, the 17.7 kernel may resolve some thorny issues.
> >
> > It isn't yet in updates-testing but it has
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 18:06:35 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/23/18 17:47, Frank Elsner wrote:
[ ... ]
> > The problem does not show up on my identicaly configured TP X121e.
>
> Is there a difference between the 2 systems if you
>
> [root@meimei ~]# cat /sys/powe
1 - 100 of 2016 matches
Mail list logo
