Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

2025-01-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 09:22 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > I am still having issues with one of the > Windows games I play not being usable under linux, but this is because > of the anti-cheat system in the game which is also documented as > potentially not working under linux. All the solutions

Re: rsync problems after update

2025-01-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:23 PM Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fedora 40: > > For years I've nightly updated copies of > three home directories using rsync. > > In yesterday's update, rsync updated to 3.4.0-1 > and the nightly run failed on all three directories > with the following error message: > >

Re: rsync problems after update

2025-01-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:06:29PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 12:23 PM Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > > On Fedora 40: > > > > For years I've nightly updated copies of > > three home directories using rsync. > > > > In yesterday's update, rsync updated to 3.4.0-1 > > and the n

Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Steve Underwood
I just bought a new SSD, installed Fedora 41 on it to occupy the whole disk, and it wouldn't boot. I tried Debian 12 and again it wouldn't boot. I then tried Debian 11 and all was well. Afterwards I checked and the Fedora 41 and Debian 12 installers are not setting the boot flag in the MBR. Is

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 19:22 +, Steve Underwood wrote: [...] Please don't hijack threads. You posted your question as a reply to a different topic and then changed the Subject line. That doesn't work properly on mailing lists (and MUAs) that pay attention to the In- Reply-To header. You need t

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 5:01 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 19:22 +, Steve Underwood wrote: > > [...] > > Please don't hijack threads. You posted your question as a reply to a > different topic and then changed the Subject line. That doesn't work > properly on mailing

rsync problems after update

2025-01-22 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fedora 40: For years I've nightly updated copies of three home directories using rsync. In yesterday's update, rsync updated to 3.4.0-1 and the nightly run failed on all three directories with the following error message: sending incremental file list Internal hashtable error: illegal ke

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 17:06 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 5:01 PM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 19:22 +, Steve Underwood wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Please don't hijack threads. You posted your question as a reply to a > > different top

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Mike Wright
On 1/22/25 15:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The problem derives from using Reply instead of New Message (or whatever the equivalent is in TB). Thunderbird reply options: Replyctrl-R Reply Allctrl-shift-R Reply List ctrl-shift-L --

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Mike Wright
On 1/22/25 15:12, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The problem derives from using Reply instead of New Message (or whatever the equivalent is in TB). Oop! New Message ctrl-N -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:23 PM Steve Underwood wrote: > > I just bought a new SSD, installed Fedora 41 on it to occupy the whole > disk, and it wouldn't boot. I tried Debian 12 and again it wouldn't > boot. I then tried Debian 11 and all was well. Afterwards I checked and > the Fedora 41 and Debi

Re: Installers not setting the boot flag

2025-01-22 Thread Tim via users
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 17:06 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Maybe there's an option in Thunderbird to start a new thread when the > subject: changes? That kind of thing causes its own problems. Any significant change to a subject line (to it, but not to you) branches off a new thread (or branches