Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

> Here is what the 'GPT:Primary header thinks Alt. header is not at the > end of the disk' message means: > . Thank you: I was able to fix the error using fdisk with just the command "w". However, this does not make my USB

Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

> I created a USB stick with a live version of Fedora 40. I tried both > the default version and the KDE Spin. I tried using dd and using > mediawriter. Same result: I cannot boot on the USB drive if my BIOS is > configured in UEFI as it is to boot from my hard disk on Fedora 38. It > says that the

Re: /boot too Small in F40

On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 10:36 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > Hi, > My /boot partition is 512MB, which in F39 was more than ample for 5 > kernels and a rescue image, but in F40 that partition is now to small > for a new rescue image to be created when a new kernel is installed. The > rescue image

Re: crazy dependencies

On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 13:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I didn't notice this originally, but you're still on F36 and expecting > help with it?? Maybe you should try using something current instead of > trying to track down issues in discontinued software. It's more about the situation in genera

Re: alternatives is forgetful?

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:59:32 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I think that preuninstall scriptlet should instead be: > > if [ $1 = 0 ]; then > /usr/sbin/alternatives --remove emacs /usr/bin/emacs-29.4 || : > fi > > See > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_syntax

Re: alternatives is forgetful?

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:00 AM Michael Schwendt wrote: > You may want to add that to: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2277689 I opened https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/emacs/pull-request/41 and mentioned it in that bug. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- __

Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and reopen it a time or two, it'll work like normal from that point on, until I reboot again. It's the weirdest thing, I can't think of anything I've ever seen a

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:52:06 -0500 Chris Adams wrote: > Not sure if this is a problem with Chrome/Chromium, some library > dependency, or even the kernel. Don't discount memory or disk problems either, though int3 seems like something deliberate (usually used as a breakpoint by debuggers). -- __

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the > first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and > reopen it a time or two, it'll work like normal from that point on, > until I reboot again. It's

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

Once upon a time, Tom Horsley said: > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:52:06 -0500 > Chris Adams wrote: > > Not sure if this is a problem with Chrome/Chromium, some library > > dependency, or even the kernel. > > Don't discount memory or disk problems either, though int3 seems like > something deliberate (

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

Once upon a time, Jeffrey Walton said: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > After some recent updates, I seem to get an illegal instruction the > > first time or two I start Chrome/Chromium after boot. If I close it and > > reopen it a time or two, it'll work like normal fro

Re: crazy dependencies

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:36:13 +0930 "Tim via users" wrote: > On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 13:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > I didn't notice this originally, but you're still on F36 and expecting > > help with it?? Maybe you should try using something current instead of > > trying to track down issues

Re: crazy dependencies

On 6/30/24 10:55 AM, Bob Marčan via users wrote: On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:36:13 +0930 "Tim via users" wrote: On Sat, 2024-06-29 at 13:35 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: I didn't notice this originally, but you're still on F36 and expecting help with it?? Maybe you should try using something current

Re: crazy dependencies

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:03:47 -0700 "Samuel Sieb" wrote: > Do you have an actual example? > Not right now. But I came across this. I'll post when it happens to me again. BR, Bob -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: crazy dependencies

On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:55:15 +, Bob Marčan via users wrote: > It's really annoying that when you try to delete a package, it deletes a > whole bunch of packages that didn't depend on that package and previously > worked without it. > BR, Bob Sure it is annoying, but it has been like that al

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

For me when an update happens for firefox (not sure if it is a firefox update or just some libraries it uses, or both) it does not crash (that I notice) but simply stops working (web page refresh and other things don't work anymore). So in the firefox case something extreme enough is happening tha

Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

> On 30 Jun 2024, at 16:30, Frédéric wrote: > > However, I was > able to download and install F36 on a USB stick and boot from it > without any issue. Are you using windows to create the usb stick? Was the f36 image a lot smaller then all the newer versions? Barry -- _

Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:49 PM Frédéric wrote: > [...] > So I'm still not able to boot F40 on a USB stick. > > Maybe, I should try F39 or F38. If it works, I will be able to upgrade > later. Some people have been able to boot either the network installer or the server installer. For the latt

Re: crazy dependencies

Samuel Sieb: >> Do you have an actual example? > Bob Marčan: > Not right now. But I came across this. I'll post when it happens to me again. > BR, Bob That was why I posted what I did about Fedora 36 (because I had a cut and paste example immediately to hand). I'm sure that it's around a month

Re: crazy dependencies

On 01/07/2024 00:04, Tim via users wrote: evolution: error while loading shared libraries: libgsttranscoder- 1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Evolution did work on that system long before those gstreamer plugins were ever installed. And it works again after re

Re: /boot too Small in F40

On 30/06/2024 03:36, Stephen Morris wrote:     I've tried dropping the number of kernels retained to 4, but that still produces out of space conditions on new kernel installs with the rescue image. You can also consider disabling the rescue kernel generation. I have never had any use for it.

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

Once upon a time, Roger Heflin said: > So maybe something similar (update breakage) is happening for chromium also. No, it's not an update vs. existing profile issue, since it happens in mock. I notice that when it happens, I get SELinux denials (which don't happen when it runs okay) for exechea

Re: Chrome/Chromium illegal instruction lately?

On 6/30/24 2:41 PM, Roger Heflin wrote: For me when an update happens for firefox (not sure if it is a firefox update or just some libraries it uses, or both) it does not crash (that I notice) but simply stops working (web page refresh and other things don't work anymore). You shouldn't update

Re: [F40] Cannot boot live version from USB drive with UEFI BIOS

On 6/29/24 10:01 AM, Frédéric wrote: I created a USB stick with a live version of Fedora 40. I tried both the default version and the KDE Spin. I tried using dd and using mediawriter. Same result: I cannot boot on the USB drive if my BIOS is configured in UEFI as it is to boot from my hard disk o