Re: grub2-install

Thank for the feedback, Thus, I am going to summarize the situation. I updated a fedora 38 installation to 40 (on sdc3) as I used to do. But this installation is now not visible from the grub bot menu. I run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg again, and again from both installation (40 and 38

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

Tim via users writes: Tim: >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- >> install? Kevin Fenzi: > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > some installs work that it's there. There was some talk about it > removing itself at the end,

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Tim via users writes: > > > Tim: > > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > > >> install? > > > > Kevin Fenzi: > > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact of the way > > > some insta

Re: grub2-install

I wish to add that efibootmgr does not list the sdc3 installation. > Subject: Re: grub2-install > > Thank for the feedback, > > Thus, I am going to summarize the situation. > I updated a fedora 38 installation to 40 (on sdc3) as I used to do. > But this installation is now not visible from the gr

Re: grub2-install

On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 13:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > I wish to add that efibootmgr does not list the sdc3 installation. By default, it'll only show the boot options that installations have entered into it. If your install didn't do that, you can add entries, yourself. Have a look

Re: grub2-install

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 3:11 AM Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > I updated a fedora 38 installation to 40 (on sdc3) as I used to do. > But this installation is now not visible from the grub bot menu. > I run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg > again, and again from both installation (40 and 38

Re: grub2-install

Hello, With your message we lost the thread. The Fedora 38 is installed on sda4 with /boot/efi on sda3 (fat16 EFI System Partition) The fedora 40 is installed on sdc3 I only have /boot installed on sdc2 I guess that I could run something like grub-install /dev/sda --target=x86_64-efi --efi-direc

Installed Rawhide with btrfs; dnf system update to v40 has errors ; re-install from Live USB without affecting a non-root subvolume?

People, A while ago I was in a hurry to start using F40 (Sway) and installed Rawhide from a live usb to get started. Everything went pretty well and I had minimal problems up until after f40 was release. However now, when I tried to do a: dnf system upgrade download --releasever=40 I ge

Re: Installed Rawhide with btrfs; dnf system update to v40 has errors ; re-install from Live USB without affecting a non-root subvolume?

On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 4:43 PM Philip Rhoades via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > People, > > A while ago I was in a hurry to start using F40 (Sway) and installed > Rawhide from a live usb to get started. > > Everything went pretty well and I had minimal problems up until after > f

Re: Installed Rawhide with btrfs; dnf system update to v40 has errors ; re-install from Live USB without affecting a non-root subvolume?

George, On 2024-06-04 09:37, George N. White III wrote: On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 4:43 PM Philip Rhoades via users wrote: People, A while ago I was in a hurry to start using F40 (Sway) and installed Rawhide from a live usb to get started. Everything went pretty well and I had minimal problem

Re: Please stop hijacking /etc/resolv.conf

Jeffrey Walton writes: On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Tim via users writes: > > > Tim: > > >> Is Anaconda more than just the OS installer, now? Is it needed post- > > >> install? > > > > Kevin Fenzi: > > > No, it's not needed. It's somewhat of a historical artifact o