> Am 20.12.2022 um 05:01 schrieb bruce :
>
> Hi.
>
> I know. centos6 is dead/buried/reincarnated.
>
> However, I have a very old box that I haven't touched in a bit.
>
> I had created a /media/TestDir using part of the drive. As I recall,
> it had been working. However, when I turned it on ea
On 12/19/22 22:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:24 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
[...]
I have tried googling this. I get tons of hits
but nothing specific to FC37.
The latest Fedora docs are at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/system-administrators-gu
> On 20/12/2022 05.01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Anyone have a favorite how to migrate
>> iptables to nftables?
>>
>> I found this so far:
>>
>>
https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Moving_from_iptables_to_nftables
>>
>> I'd rather one specifically with Fedora i
And yeaHi Peter.
Thanks for the reply.
It appears that the issue is as simple as -- the LABEL of the
partition from gparted is "TestDir' - not /media/TestDir <<
one I changed the line in the fstab..
>> LABEL=TestDir /media/TestDir
and then did a mount -a
The partition/data is viewable..
At s
> Am 20.12.2022 um 13:39 schrieb bruce :
>
> And yeaHi Peter.
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> It appears that the issue is as simple as -- the LABEL of the
> partition from gparted is "TestDir' - not /media/TestDir <<
> one I changed the line in the fstab..
>>> LABEL=TestDir /media/TestDir
>
>
> On 12/19/22 15:55, Mickey Mouse wrote:
>
> Not so far it has not. And it has had opportunities
> out the wazoo to do such:
>
> # cat /etc/resolv.conf
> search acme.local
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
> By the way, you missed the part about me
> uninstalling systemd-resolved. Someone
> (a.k.a. Mic
On 12/20/22 05:25, Jonathan Billings wrote:
But you're basically setting up an unmaintainable mess, something
It is really easy for me to maintain.
It also gives me breathing room
to trying and figure out the new mess.
I am missing your point. What part is
not maintainable?
My machine wor
Brand new lenovo x1 carbon.
Today the "discover" sw update app suggest fw updates. I went ahead with
them. Now wifi isn't working properly. At boot, I get a hang on
Job NetworkManager-wait-online.service/start running
Then it will finish boot after some time, but only 2.4G wifi works. It
won'
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:18 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Brand new lenovo x1 carbon.
>
> Today the "discover" sw update app suggest fw updates. I went ahead with
> them. Now wifi isn't working properly. At boot, I get a hang on
> Job NetworkManager-wait-online.service/start running
Sorry to he
Well I performed 2 downgrades. On the 2nd one it totally hung, saying 100%
done and will reboot. It won't. Even holding the power button does
nothing.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:27 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:18 AM Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> > Brand new lenovo x1 carb
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:18, Neal Becker wrote:
> But is there maybe someway to revert the firmware updates? Or any other
> ideas?
"fwupdmgr get-history" would be helpful in knowing what you updated,
and hopefully the older update is also there -- so "fwupdmgr
downgrade" would restore the old
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 15:27, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> fwupdmgr is not well documented. The man pages suck
Remember to be awesome. This is an open source project and the number
of people writing documentation is less than one.
Richard
___
users mailing
On 12/19/22 17:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
# uname -r
6.0.12-300.fc37.x86_64
I have tried googling this. I get tons of hits
but nothing specific to FC37.
Just noticed that I can not do:
$ curl -v ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/AcrobatDC/ -o -
* Connecting to 192.147.
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 19:26, Michael D. Setzer II via users
wrote:
> Got a reply that that is currently the case, and only option
> would be to install windows on machine, or remove drive
> and put in windows machine to upgrade??
If the firmware isn't on the LVFS[1] then you might be able to dep
On Tue Dec20'22 12:45:54AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Walton
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:45:54 -0500
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: figjux figjux
> Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject: Re: I HAVE NOY USE FEDOREA AT ALL
>
> O
> On 20 Dec 2022, at 17:29, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> On 12/19/22 17:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> # uname -r
>> 6.0.12-300.fc37.x86_64
>> I have tried googling this. I get tons of hits
>> but nothing specific to FC37.
>> Just noticed that I can not do:
>> $ curl -
> On 12/20/22 05:25, Mickey Mouse wrote:
>
>
> It is really easy for me to maintain.
>
> It also gives me breathing room
> to trying and figure out the new mess.
>
> I am missing your point. What part is
> not maintainable?
Now you have a system that won't do things that most fedora systems d
On 12/20/22 13:21, Jonathan Billings wrote:
Now you have a system that won't do things that most fedora systems do out of
the box. You've got a system that might pull in systemd-resolved at some point
in the future if a dependency of some other package updates, and break your
setup. You have
On 12/20/22 11:18, Barry Scott wrote:
On 20 Dec 2022, at 17:29, ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 12/19/22 17:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
# uname -r
6.0.12-300.fc37.x86_64
I have tried googling this. I get tons of hits
but nothing specific to FC37.
Just noticed that I can not
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:05 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
> On 12/20/22 11:18, Barry Scott wrote:
> > [...]
> > I found this comment "But keep in mind this is considered a security
> > vulnerability - that's why newer kernels changed the default value of
> > nf_conntrack_helper to false." on
>
>> On 12/20/22 05:25, Mickey Mouse (A.K.A. His Resplendence) wrote:
On 12/20/22 13:21, Jonathan Billings wrote:
Its not maintainable because instead of figuring out the solution, you hacked
out parts of the OS until you got something that looks something kinda sorta
like what you're used to in
On 12/20/22 14:14, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 5:05 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 12/20/22 11:18, Barry Scott wrote:
[...]
I found this comment "But keep in mind this is considered a security
vulnerability - that's why newer kernels changed the default value of
nf_connt
Fix it!!!
This was the missing link:
$tbls -t raw -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 21 -j CT --helper ftp
Here are my new rules:
-T
# FTP Passive Mode stuff
# raw:
#
# This table is used mainly for configuring exemptions from
# connection tracking in combination with the NOTRACK target.
# It
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 21:21 +, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> Now you have a system that won't do things that most fedora systems
> do out of the box. You've got a system that might pull in systemd-
> resolved at some point in the future if a dependency of some other
> package updates, and break y
On 12/20/22 16:43, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 21:21 +, Jonathan Billings wrote:
Now you have a system that won't do things that most fedora systems
do out of the box. You've got a system that might pull in systemd-
resolved at some point in the future if a dependency of some
25 matches
Mail list logo
