On 1/9/22 09:45, Roger Heflin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:02 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
On 30/8/22 01:16, Roger Heflin wrote:
sudo/root is required to access the grub subdirectory because the
permissions are locked down.
I would guess since there can be encrypted grub passwords (and
possib
I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second):
Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
Sep 01 11:02:03 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
Sep 01 11:02:02 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my
> interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that
> folder for the junk processing to determine a new mail is junk according
> to your rules,
My under
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 9:43 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 08:57 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > I'm not sure about emptying the junk folder automatically, my
> > interpretation of the junk process was the mails have to remain in that
> > folder for the junk processing to determ
> On 1 Sep 2022, at 11:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second):
>
> Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
> Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
> Sep 01 11:02:03 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscr
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 18:00 +0100, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 1 Sep 2022, at 11:20, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting this in the journal (repeats once per second):
> >
> > Sep 01 11:02:05 Bree cupsd[1156]: Expiring subscriptions...
> > Sep 01 11:02:04 Bree cupsd[1156]: Exp
Hey Fedorans,
We are running a Fedora 37 Pre-Beta Release Validation[0] Test Week!
Come help test the Pre-Beta image and fill up matrixes in here[1].
If you have any questions, reach out to #fedora-test-day on libera or test list!
[0] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/f37-pre-beta-release-v
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and
> they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check
> what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously junked, and you
> can reclassify it as b
I want to build a custom kernel with some modules and patches added, and
package this as an rpm to install. I have tried adding it like building the
kernel from the git source, but it doesnt have the modules. I think it might
have to do with the .spec file. I added the patches to the rpm, and I
I have a few custom (out-of-tree) drivers and patches, and I want to add them
to a rpm package for the kernel, how can I do that. The drivers have to go in
the staging folder, but they dont seem to get built by the spec file.
___
users mailing list -- u
Please ignore this, I though my previous post was accidentally deleted.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-
Sharpened Blade via users writes:
I have a few custom (out-of-tree) drivers and patches, and I want to add
them to a rpm package for the kernel, how can I do that. The drivers have to
go in the staging folder, but they dont seem to get built by the spec file.
Correct. The mere presence of s
On 02/09/2022 11.11, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 22:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
My understanding was that the interpretation had already been done, and
they remain in the junk folder in case it got it wrong. You can check
what it's junking, you can find a mail it erroneously
13 matches
Mail list logo
