On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 22:14 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> A font viewer should only use the system font folders and any modern
> font viewer will use fontconfig, which won't be looking in random
> directories.
It's not really random directories, though. There's the everyone's
fonts in a system lo
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:03 PM home user wrote:
[...]
> 1. What fonts are by default automatically installed by Fedora (whether
> by a new install or by "dnf system-upgrade"? Equivalently, which of the
> fonts on my work station were put there by Fedora itself, and which were
> installed by oth
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:14 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> A font viewer should only use the system font folders and any modern
> font viewer will use fontconfig, which won't be looking in random
> directories.
>
The fontconfig system has a well defined way to configure the directories
it searches,
Hi,
On 2022-05-20 20:13:13+0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Do you have more than one screensaver installed?
No.
It seem to have been cleared with the updated kernel and Nvidia kmod
yesterday, kernel-5.17.9-300, I have not seen the behavior since then,
so so far all seem OK again. A bit strange...
On 2022-04-27 17:34:17-0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2022, at 07:25, Justin Moore
> In general, the way I suggest debugging these kinds of hangs at
> shutdown/reboot are to run:
>
> journalctl --boot=-1 --reverse
One thing to note.
I got bitten by the following quite recently:
[la
Hello Everyone,
I am running Fedora 36, fully updated as of right now...
I am running version 2.1.1-1 of puddletag. That is the most recent
version of puddletag in the official Fedora repo.
I have had puddletag crash on multiple occasions since I started running
this version under Fedora 36.
On 5/25/22 14:00, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
but since puddletag crashes silently, and without invoking ABRT, I have
no idea if that report has anything to do with my issue.
Do you see any messages if you run it from a terminal?
___
users mailing list --
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:02 PM Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am running Fedora 36, fully updated as of right now...
>
> I am running version 2.1.1-1 of puddletag. That is the most recent
> version of puddletag in the official Fedora repo.
>
> I have had puddletag crash on multi
On 5/25/22 16:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/25/22 14:00, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
but since puddletag crashes silently, and without invoking ABRT, I
have no idea if that report has anything to do with my issue.
Do you see any messages if you run it from a terminal?
Boy, I feel silly. Should hav
On 5/25/22 16:29, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/25/22 14:00, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
but since puddletag crashes silently, and without invoking ABRT, I
have no idea if that report has anything to do with my issue.
Do you see any messages if you run it from a terminal?
Boy, I feel silly. Should hav
Hi! I have a very strange situation after i updated my system to fedora 36:
the new 5.17.9-300.fc36.x86_64 does not boot or at least cannot start my monitor (i get
on the monitor "no signal received")
while the identical fedora 35 one worrks 5.17.9-200.fc35.x86_64
having an nvidia card, i checke
11 matches
Mail list logo
