Re: Long wait for start job

On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 19:06 -0400, Go Canes wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 5:30 PM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 13:44 -0400, Go Canes wrote: > > > > I still don't know why my external dock is being mounted at > > > > boot, > > > > but I > > > > can live with it for

Re: Long wait for start job

On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 03:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 13/06/2021 23:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I did the same and it has made a big difference, i.e. I no longer > > have > > the very long delay waiting for usb-settle. > > > > I still don't know why my external dock is being mounted at

Re: Long wait for start job

On 14/06/2021 17:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 03:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 13/06/2021 23:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I did the same and it has made a big difference, i.e. I no longer have the very long delay waiting for usb-settle. I still don't know why my exte

Re: Long wait for start job

On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 14:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > I actually use a udev rule for idle spin down: > >  $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/69-hdparm.rules > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="block", \ >   KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", \ >   ENV{ID_SERIAL_SHORT}=="WDZ47F0A", \ >   RUN+="/usr/sbin/hdparm -B 100 -S 252 /d

Re: Long wait for start job

On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 18:02 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 14/06/2021 17:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 03:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 13/06/2021 23:57, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > I did the same and it has made a big difference, i.e. I no > > > > longer > >

Re: Long wait for start job

On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 11:10 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 14:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I actually use a udev rule for idle spin down: > > > >  $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/69-hdparm.rules > > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="block", \ > >   KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]", \ > >   ENV

Re: test message

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 02:43, Tim via users wrote: > On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 15:11 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote: > > My provider is refusing messages from this list. > > I'm chccking to see if that's still true. > > > > Well, it worked. But might I suggest not using your service provider's > email

Fwd: BTRFS partition corrupted after deleting files in /home

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:23 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > 2) Since there is a high likelihood that my filesystem is not > > completely fixed, then when I take a backup using partclone, dd or > > clonezilla won't those errors be carried over ? > > Yes. I recommend a Pika Backup for a simple GUI s

Re: test message

Tim: >> If you use an external one (e.g. gmail, yahoo, or many others), >> you're not subject your provider's whims... George N. White III: > Or the whims of people who spend their time reporting content they > don't like to blocklists. The downside of the external email > providers is that your

Re: FC34 broke my bind

dnssec-validation yes; should work, ensure include "/etc/named.root.key"; is in named.conf too. dnssec-validation auto; would work even without it. It requires your forwarders to supply DNSSEC records. Check with: dig @$IP +dnssec com ds Or with validation: delv @$IP com ds Replace $IP with any

Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

Hi, BTRFS is not working out for me. What will be the easiest way to move to EXT4 ? I am on Fedora 33. Please note I also want to backup my root filesystem and not just my home. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fe

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:38 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > Hi, > > BTRFS is not working out for me. > > What will be the easiest way to move to EXT4 ? > > I am on Fedora 33. > > Please note I also want to backup my root filesystem and not just my home. > I think if you ask 10 people you'll ge

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:35 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:38 AM Sreyan Chakravarty > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > BTRFS is not working out for me. > > > > What will be the easiest way to move to EXT4 ? > > > > I am on Fedora 33. > > > > Please note I also want to backup my

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:31 AM Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:35 PM Chris Murphy > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:38 AM Sreyan Chakravarty >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > BTRFS is not working out for me. >> > >> > What will be the easiest way to move to E

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On 6/14/21 12:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: The easiest to*explain* is: * backup /home * clean install the OS using Custom partitioning's "LVM" preset partitioning scheme * restore /home from backup Or, as I do, because I don't use LVM, do a clean install, using the current partitioning scheme a

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On 6/14/21 1:12 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: I mean if I backup from BTRFS can I restore it into ext4 ? Your backup software neither knows nor cares how your filesystem is formatted, so of course you can. Unless, of course, you're cloning the partition, in which case a restore will overwri

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50:57 PM EDT Joe Zeff wrote: > On 6/14/21 1:12 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > I mean if I backup from BTRFS can I restore it into ext4 ? > > Your backup software neither knows nor cares how your filesystem is > formatted, so of course you can. Unless, of course, you

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 1:57 PM Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50:57 PM EDT Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 6/14/21 1:12 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > I mean if I backup from BTRFS can I restore it into ext4 ? > > > > Your backup software neither knows nor cares how your file

Re: Easiest way to move from BTRFS to EXT4 without losing data

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021, 1:27 am Garry T. Williams, wrote: > On Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50:57 PM EDT Joe Zeff wrote: > > On 6/14/21 1:12 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > > > I mean if I backup from BTRFS can I restore it into ext4 ? > > > > Your backup software neither knows nor cares how your filesys

Live and PlayStation 4?

Anyone know if you can boot up a PlayStation 4 with a Fedora Live USB stick? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.o

Re: Live and PlayStation 4?

On 6/14/21 2:24 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Anyone know if you can boot up a PlayStation 4 with a Fedora Live USB stick? FC34 stick And will it connect to the WiFi? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: test message

The problem is still not resolved. I was dealing with the weekend staff at my provider so we'll see if thing are  any better with the weekday staff :) The strange thing today is that the list administrator flushed the queue this morning and several messages came in but nothing since then. A

Re: Live and PlayStation 4?

On 6/14/21 2:24 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Anyone know if you can boot up a PlayStation 4 with a Fedora Live USB stick? Did you try checking with Google first? I see various videos and articles about it. (Not specifically Fedora, so you'll have to adjust as necessary.) _

Re: Live and PlayStation 4?

On 6/14/21 4:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 6/14/21 2:24 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Anyone know if you can boot up a PlayStation 4 with a Fedora Live USB stick? Did you try checking with Google first?  I see various videos and articles about it.  (Not specifically Fedora, so you'll have

Re: Live and PlayStation 4?

On 6/14/21 8:34 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Duck Duck Go.   Google censors political speech not to its liking and it spies on you mercilessly. This is why I use startpage.com. It keeps no record of your IP address so that nobody can tie your searches to you. YMMV, but that's my perso

Re: Live and PlayStation 4?

On 6/14/21 7:45 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 6/14/21 8:34 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Duck Duck Go.   Google censors political speech not to its liking and it spies on you mercilessly. This is why I use startpage.com.  It keeps no record of your IP address so that nobody can tie your searche

'managed-keys' is deprecated ??

Hi All, FC34 bin 9.16 Placing include "/etc/named.root.key"; in my bind.conf, give me the following error # named-checkconf -l -t /var/named/chroot /etc/named.conf /etc/named.root.key:1: option 'managed-keys' is deprecated What do I use it its place? (The Duck is failing me.) Many thanks

Re: FC34 broke my bind

# host google.com 127.0.0.1 Using domain server: Name: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Aliases: Host google.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL) [root@rn6 etc]# systemctl status named-chroot.service ● named-chroot.service - Berkeley In

Re: remove doublets

This preserves line order: $ cat file.txt dd aa bb cc bb aa $ awk '!line[$0]++' file.txt dd aa bb cc -- Best Regards, Oğuz ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: 'managed-keys' is deprecated ??

ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Placing >include "/etc/named.root.key"; > in my bind.conf, give me the following error > > > # named-checkconf -l -t /var/named/chroot /etc/named.conf > /etc/named.root.key:1: option 'managed-keys' is deprecated > > What do I use it its place? (The Duck is fa

Re: 'managed-keys' is deprecated ??

On 6/14/21 9:16 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Placing include "/etc/named.root.key"; in my bind.conf, give me the following error # named-checkconf -l -t /var/named/chroot /etc/named.conf /etc/named.root.key:1: option 'managed-keys' is deprecated What do I use it

Re: 'managed-keys' is deprecated ??

On 6/14/21 9:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/14/21 9:16 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Placing     include "/etc/named.root.key"; in my bind.conf, give me the following error # named-checkconf -l -t /var/named/chroot /etc/named.conf /etc/named.root.key:1: op

My FC33->FC34 bind-chroot upgrade notes

Hi All, Thank you all for the enormous help in me getting bind-chroot working after upgrading to Fedora 34. Here are my notes. Hope this helps someone else. -T Broken bind-chroot repair after upgrading to Fedora 34: # means root $ means user 1) temporary workaround so you can surf the Int

Re: My FC33->FC34 bind-chroot upgrade notes

On 2021-06-14 10:00 p.m., ToddAndMargo via users wrote:   # systemctl enable  named-chroot.service   # systemctl start   named-chroot.service In case you didn't know, "enable --now" will enable and also start the service and "disable --now" will disable and stop it.

Re: My FC33->FC34 bind-chroot upgrade notes

On 6/14/21 11:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2021-06-14 10:00 p.m., ToddAndMargo via users wrote:    # systemctl enable  named-chroot.service    # systemctl start   named-chroot.service In case you didn't know, "enable --now" will enable and also start the service and "disable --now" wi