Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

2021-04-10 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:37 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > I have tried at length to get bind 9 to support proper a split > horizon configuration without success. I remember going through that with you last year. It definitely works, as I did it on my system as I went through it with you. Do you hav

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

2021-04-10 Thread Jack Craig
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:20 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:37 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > > I have tried at length to get bind 9 to support proper a split > > horizon configuration without success. > > I remember going through that with you last year. It definitely works, > a

Re: A problem with Fedora and Wine

2021-04-10 Thread Francisco Tissera
Hello there, Moving the wine folder to somewhere else does not solve the problem, it's no use. Best regards. Francisco. On 4/9/21 12:46 PM, Qiyu Yan wrote: 在 2021-04-09星期五的 06:48 -0400,Francisco Tissera写道: Hello there, As far as I saw, this happened with several applications. Try more a

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/04/2021 03:51, home user wrote: I just finished upgrading from f32 to f33. When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I use the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But dnf shows it installed and up-to-date.  Before today's update, caja was easi

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread Joe Zeff
On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Of course it was installed from updates. Why should that matter? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread Ed Greshko
On 11/04/2021 10:56, Joe Zeff wrote: On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Of course it was installed from updates. Why should that matter? Because I don't know the habits of the OP in installing updates. So, not being in the habit of making assumptions and my not knowing how the Activitie

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread home user
On 4/10/21 9:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 11/04/2021 10:56, Joe Zeff wrote: On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Of course it was installed from updates. Why should that matter? Because I don't know the habits of the OP in installing updates. So, not being in the habit of making assumpti

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/10/21 9:38 PM, home user wrote: Since the upgrade (and patching) keeps the most recent 2 patches, I tried to boot up in each of those last 2 (f32), log in, and check for caja.  The application has become "invisible" to gnome in those patches also. It doesn't actually work like that. Onl

Re: invisible application after upgrade.

2021-04-10 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:51 -0600, home user wrote: > When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I > use the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But > dnf shows it installed and up-to-date. My first guess would be to locate caja.desktop file(s), and chec

Re: A problem with Fedora and Wine

2021-04-10 Thread Qiyu Yan
在 2021-04-10星期六的 15:51 -0400,Francisco Tissera写道: > Hello there, > > > Moving the wine folder to somewhere else does not solve the problem, > it's no use. In this case I don't think it have something to do with Wine shipped with fedora, I think. Back to the original error message > Unhandled

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

2021-04-10 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 12:03 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > OK time to share the real problem here ,it is me. that is to say > after several decades of computer work I got Parkinson's and that > forced me to stop working commercially. I didn't want to give up my > networking all the way so I keep thi

Re: systemd-resolved, split dns, & vpn setup

2021-04-10 Thread Tim via users
I'm answering this with a separate response because it goes off in a different direction. You can decide which way to go without mixing up all the information together. On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 12:03 -0700, Jack Craig wrote: > I think I understand that the primary name server for domain must be > in