On 3/1/21 11:34 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 3/2/21 2:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/1/21 10:37 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
I bought a rather cheap but not so cheap 1TB SSD drive advertised at
rw speeds of 450MB/s. I have 2 thinkpads, one X1 3rd gen and one X1
6th gen. Now here is what happene
Hello,
When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm
I get:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
dnf install libatomic1
Last metadata expiration
On 02/03/2021 16:37, Patrick Dupre wrote:
When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm
I get:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
dnf instal
flatpak search skype
No matches found
> On 02/03/2021 16:37, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm
> > I get:
> > Error:
> > Problem: conflicting requests
> >- nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64
> > (try to
Dear Ed,
I'll paste below the output that the command you suggested gave me,
there's something disturbing indeed in that command, that I didn't try
till you suggested it.
systemctl status brltty
● brltty.service - Braille display driver for Linux/Unix
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/
On 02/03/2021 16:48, Patrick Dupre wrote:
flatpak search skype
No matches found
What do you have for
flatpak remotes
?
--
People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 3/2/21 12:37 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
When I try to update skype to version 8.69.0.77-1.x86_64.rpm
I get:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libatomic1 needed by skypeforlinux-8.69.0.77-1.x86_64
It's a packaging bug. Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "soon".
On 02/03/2021 17:10, Francisco Tissera wrote:
I'll paste below the output that the command you suggested gave me, there's
something disturbing indeed in that command, that I didn't try till you
suggested it.
systemctl status brltty
● brltty.service - Braille display driver for Linux/Unix
On 3/2/21 8:34 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Anyway since I am somehow back to initial lousy speeds and saw it way faster on the same
machines, is there a "reliable" way to go back to more decent speed then?
Before putting filesystems in the middle:
hdparm -t /dev/xxx
to test sequential rea
Name Options
fedora system,oci
>
> On 02/03/2021 16:48, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > flatpak search skype
> >
> > No matches found
>
> What do you have for
>
> flatpak remotes
>
> ?
>
> --
> People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.
> ___
Dear ed,
How do I add the brlapi entry to /etc/group? i opened it in Nano, but i
don't understand the sintacs.
Thanks again.
Best regards.
Francisco.
On 3/2/21 10:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/03/2021 17:10, Francisco Tissera wrote:
I'll paste below the output that the command you sugg
On 02/03/2021 17:29, Francisco Tissera wrote:
How do I add the brlapi entry to /etc/group? i opened it in Nano, but i don't
understand the sintacs.
Well
You can add the line
brlapi:x:975:
to the file.
But, just make sure that 975 is unique.
Or, you can use the "groupadd" command.
Dear Ed,
I inserted the line
brlapi:x:1010:francisco
to the end of the file /etc/group with Nano as sudoer, and when i type
groups, I apparently am in the brlapi group, but i still get this error
for some odd reason.
Did i do something wrong?
Best regards.
Francisco.
On 3/2/21 10:40 AM,
On 02/03/2021 17:54, Francisco Tissera wrote:
I inserted the line
brlapi:x:1010:francisco
to the end of the file /etc/group with Nano as sudoer, and when i type groups,
I apparently am in the brlapi group, but i still get this error for some odd
reason.
Did i do something wrong?
By this
Resending Sent off-list by mistake...
On 02/03/2021 17:26, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Name Options
fedora system,oci
You don't have
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ flatpak remotes
Name Options
fedora system,oci
flathub system
You need to add the flathub remote.
Sadly, I don't recall how to
On 3/2/21 4:23 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 3/2/21 8:34 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Anyway since I am somehow back to initial lousy speeds and saw it way
faster on the same machines, is there a "reliable" way to go back to
more decent speed then?
Before putting filesystems in the middle:
hdpa
One complication. You said you aren't using a HUB, that is probably
not exactly true. Almost all of the USB ports on a laptop or a
desktop are using a HUB, very few of the ports are dedicated.
Typically a laptop or desktop has at most 3 actual real underlying
ports, and some do not even have that
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 01:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "soon".
It's 2021, they still never got Win98 working properly...
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.15.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 3 15:06:38 UTC 2021 x86_64
Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to m
Sorry, you'll have to wait till 2098
-Original Message-
From: Tim via users
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:22 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Tim
Subject: Re: skype
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 01:19 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Someone said that Microsoft will fix it "soon".
It's 202
On 3/2/21 7:20 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
One complication. You said you aren't using a HUB, that is probably
not exactly true. Almost all of the USB ports on a laptop or a
desktop are using a HUB, very few of the ports are dedicated.
Typically a laptop or desktop has at most 3 actual real underly
On 2021-03-02 1:37 a.m., Frederic Muller wrote:
So I was wondering if there was any logical explanations and things I
could do to ensure I use the disk at its maximum speed.
You are using Fedora, so you have an already-installed graphical utility
to run a quick benchmark test on the disk. Y
On 3/2/21 12:47 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 3/2/21 4:23 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 3/2/21 8:34 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Anyway since I am somehow back to initial lousy speeds and saw it way faster on the same
machines, is there a "reliable" way to go back to more decent speed then?
Bef
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 05:30, Francisco Tissera
wrote:
> Dear ed,
>
>
> How do I add the brlapi entry to /etc/group? i opened it in Nano, but i
> don't understand the sintacs.
>
The Changelog for version 6.3 -- Fedora 33 provides 6.1 (January 28, 2021)
-- has:
Systemd changes:
The brlapi group
On 3/2/21 9:58 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 3/2/21 12:47 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 3/2/21 4:23 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
On 3/2/21 8:34 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Anyway since I am somehow back to initial lousy speeds and saw it
way faster on the same machines, is there a "reliable" way t
Dear George, Thanks for the changelog, I’ll download and install 6.3 then.Would I just download the rpm and install it, or would I have to download the source rpm as well? Brltty.com lists both, and so I don’t know how to go about it the right way.I’m sorry for so many questions that might seem dum
Hey All,
PulseAudio deamon has been a default in Fedora for a really long time.
As a part of the Fedora 34 changeset, PipeWire has been set to
default[0] which will route all audio from PulseAudio and JACK to the
PipeWire Audio daemon by default. This is a very crucial change and
will require sign
I see that Fedora Linux 34 will contain the 6.3 release, by the way.
In the meantime, I suggest to use
sudo groupadd brlapi
to create a new group rather than editing with nano, and
sudo gpasswd brlapi -a $USER
to add yourself to that group. You will then need to log out and in again
fo
Dear all, Now this, is something interesting for an actual screen reader user such as myself and every blind person who uses Fedora.I’ve heard both good and bad things about pipewire, and I’m really tempted to upgrade to Rawhide and test if the transition from Pulse to Pipewire works with Orca.For
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:25, Francisco Tissera
wrote:
> Dear George,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the changelog, I’ll download and install 6.3 then.
>
> Would I just download the rpm and install it, or would I have to download
> the source rpm as well? Brltty.com lists both, and so I don’t know how to
> go
On 3/2/21 3:47 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
So now how can configure Fedora 33 to get the optimum speed is the
question. Are there BIOS or system settings that make it happen? The X1
3rd gen now has a new bios, not the 6th gen. The 6th gen went from
400MB/s down to 40MB/s switching from F32 to F3
On 03/03/2021 03:29, George N. White III wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 12:25, Francisco Tissera mailto:audiogamer2...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear George,
Thanks for the changelog, I’ll download and install 6.3 then.
Would I just download the rpm and install it, or would I have to downlo
Putting this back on the Fedora List
On 03/03/2021 00:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Finally, I have
Name Options
fedora system,oci
flathub system
flatpak search skype
Name Description Application ID Version Branch Remotes
Sky… Call and message skype users, w… com.skype.
Hi,
I have a problem with an old rack unit I use in a cluster. We had a problem
with the HD and had to change it and reinstall. It was done by someone new to
the job (I am locked and doing everything remotely) and he had a problem with
the configuration as it seems that this unit HD HAS to be co
On 3/2/21 5:04 PM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> so it is there and seen but why the block device is not created?
> Copying the content of (sda1)boot into /boot and reinstalling grub could
> probably work but how?
Hi GianPiero,
This is strange. I don't know why there's no device file for the first
On 03/03/2021 05:04, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with an old rack unit I use in a cluster. We had a problem
with the HD and had to change it and reinstall. It was done by someone new to
the job (I am locked and doing everything remotely) and he had a problem with
the configur
if you are running multipath then here is what happened, multipath
started up and attempted to manage sda and so it deleted sda1, then
once it gets to sda2 it figures out the vg is live and online and it
figures out it cannot manage it, so stops. No code exists apparently
to go back and put back s
On 02/03/2021 17:54, Francisco Tissera wrote:
Did i do something wrong?
Also, there is a mailing list devoted to brltty here
https://brltty.app/mailman/listinfo/brltty
They may have greater knowledge in this area.
--
People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one.
___
On 3/2/21 9:58 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
You just want the result and it is not sure what you are measuring and
in which conditions.
That's why you should try things in order:
- lsusb -t (guess you may be falling back from USB3 to USB2 for some
reason, since 40-50MB/s is typical of USB2)
- hdp
On 3/3/21 2:03 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 3/2/21 9:58 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
You just want the result and it is not sure what you are measuring
and in which conditions.
That's why you should try things in order:
- lsusb -t (guess you may be falling back from USB3 to USB2 for some
reason
On 3/2/21 11:27 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Going through the graphical benchmark I can actually see "why": the read
speed is making a straight line at about 450MB/s in NTFS (
https://imagebin.ca/v/5td8fZkQCGY9 ) while it's zigzagging with ext4 (
https://imagebin.ca/v/5td8voL3uiqj )
Any idea
On 3/3/21 2:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/2/21 11:27 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
Going through the graphical benchmark I can actually see "why": the
read speed is making a straight line at about 450MB/s in NTFS (
https://imagebin.ca/v/5td8fZkQCGY9 ) while it's zigzagging with ext4
( https://
41 matches
Mail list logo
