Routing traffic of a VM to specific NIC of the host machine.

Hi, I have a CentOS 7 (use KVM) box with two physical NICs. There is a fedora VM running. I need to route my VM traffic via one of the NIC. This need to persistent. Regards, -- Danishka Navin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: Routing traffic of a VM to specific NIC of the host machine.

On 1/29/21 12:08 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: I have a CentOS 7  (use KVM) box with two physical NICs. There is a fedora VM running. I need to route my VM traffic via one of the NIC. This need to persistent. What are you using to run the vm? If you use virt-manager, you can pick which interface

Re: Routing traffic of a VM to specific NIC of the host machine.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:44 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 1/29/21 12:08 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: > > I have a CentOS 7 (use KVM) box with two physical NICs. > > There is a fedora VM running. > > > > I need to route my VM traffic via one of the NIC. > > This need to persistent. > > What are you us

Re: Routing traffic of a VM to specific NIC of the host machine.

On 1/29/21 12:49 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:44 PM Samuel Sieb > wrote: On 1/29/21 12:08 AM, Danishka Navin wrote: > I have a CentOS 7  (use KVM) box with two physical NICs. > There is a fedora VM running. > > I need to rout

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:59 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > You completely removed any context and your message is unclear... > > Q: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb? > > A: Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other

Identifying Firefox threads

This may be slightly OT. If so, apologies. I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over time, presumably because some tab is doing a lot of work. However the usual process listings from 'top' or 'glances' just show a bunch of fairly cryptic threads such as: 85.4 20.3 7.1

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over > time, presumably because some tab is doing a lot of work. However the > usual process listings from 'top' or 'glances' just show a bunch of > fairly cryptic t

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:32 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > there's a very good reason why the long- > > established way to participate in a mailing list is quote the salient > > bits of the prior email and directly reply to individual sentences or > > paragraphs right underneath them. So tha

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 06:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:59 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: [...] > > Or, put another way, there's a very good reason why the long- > > established way to participate in a mailing lis

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:27:18 -0500 Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > it's hard to know which one is associated with which tab (or tabs). > > > > Does anyone have a cheat sheet to help in pinning down the > > culprit(s)? > > There'

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:27 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over > > time, presumably because some tab is doing a lot of work. However the > > usual process listing

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 07:47 -0700, Greg Woods wrote: > I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able > to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be > included > in my reply, but that no longer works; the entire message is included > and I > have to manually trim

Re: rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:33:20AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:40:10PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > Hi Matthew, > > > > > > I just did a > > ># dnf remove rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.x86_6

Re: rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:25 AM Doug H. wrote: > I had the "core" issue here also. First I dnf erased the .i686 version > without issue. I later did the same for the .x86_64 version, again not issue. > > My dnf update today ended with: > > Installing dependencies: > rdma-corei686

Re: rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 09:28:33AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > Same here. As for what is pulling it in: > > $ rpm -q --whatrequires 'rdma-core(x86-64)' > libibverbs-33.0-2.fc33.x86_64 > librdmacm-33.0-2.fc33.x86_64 > libibumad-33.0-2.fc33.x86_64 > $ rpm -q --whatrequires 'rdma-core(x86-32)' >

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Friday, January 29, 2021 9:47:35 AM EST Greg Woods wrote: > I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able > to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be included > in my reply, but that no longer works; the entire message is included and I > have to manually

Re: rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > This is all more infiniband high-performance networking stuff. If you don't > immediately know what it is, odds are you will never need it in your life. Here's how I wound up with these packages: gnome-boxes -> libvirt-daemon-kvm -> qemu-k

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 12:08 -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On Friday, January 29, 2021 9:47:35 AM EST Greg Woods wrote: > > I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able > > to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be included > > in my reply, but that no lo

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

me too,thx!! On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:10 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 09:27 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over > > > time, presum

Re: broken email clients

On 1/29/21 7:06 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 06:31, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:59 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: [...] > Or, put another way

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On 1/29/21 6:27 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over time, presumably because some tab is doing a lot of work. However the usual process listings from 'top' or 'glances'

Re: auditd log processing tools?

in the OP's text: - 1. sentence, last part: "...would like to get more involved with auditd." - in the 2. sentence, 2. part: "..., but are there any tools to process the audit.log..." - in the 4. paragraph, last part of the sentence: "..., but what do people do with this information ..." wro

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On 1/29/21 1:19 PM, sixpack13 wrote: in the OP's text: - 1. sentence, last part: "...would like to get more involved with auditd." - in the 2. sentence, 2. part: "..., but are there any tools to process the audit.log..." - in the 4. paragraph, last part of the sentence: "..., but what do peopl

Re: auditd log processing tools?

Aha ! THX, something learned ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines

Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

Folks,   I have a new dell laptop.  I tried to install Fedora 33 on it, but it failed to find any disks.  I searched the internet and discovered that if my BIOS has RAID enabled F33 is unable to find any drives.  I disabled RAID and enable AHCI and was then able to install and boot F33.  I the

Re: auditd log processing tools?

@Alex obviously I provides wrong info's trying to answer your questions. sorry ! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraprojec

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote: > Aha ! > THX, something learned And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 12:25 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 1/29/21 6:27 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over > > > time, presumably because some tab is doing a lot

Re: Identifying Firefox threads

On 30/01/2021 06:37, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 12:25 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/29/21 6:27 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 11:06:57AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I find that Firefox tends to slow down and consume more memory over time, presuma

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

Paolo Galtieri writes: Folks,   I have a new dell laptop.  I tried to install Fedora 33 on it, but it failed to find any disks.  I searched the internet and discovered that if my BIOS has RAID enabled F33 is unable to find any drives.  I disabled RAID and enable AHCI and was then able to i

Re: auditd log processing tools?

> On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to. > > poc to me it seems completely unnecessary. My comment is right under the comment I replied to. that is the case now here in hyperkitty and - IIRC- was the same when I read

Re: auditd log processing tools?

s/provides/provided/ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https:

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 23:05 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote: > > > > And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to. > > > > poc > > to me it seems completely unnecessary. > My comment is right under the comment I replied to. > > tha

Re: auditd log processing tools?

On 30/01/2021 07:05, sixpack13 wrote: On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote: And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to. poc to me it seems completely unnecessary. My comment is right under the comment I replied to. You may think it is unnecessary.  However, so

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

On 1/29/21 2:54 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Paolo Galtieri writes: Folks,   I have a new dell laptop.  I tried to install Fedora 33 on it, but it failed to find any disks.  I searched the internet and discovered that if my BIOS has RAID enabled F33 is unable to find any drives.  I disabled RA

Re: Plasma on Xorg Fails to Start After Last System Update

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:15:12AM +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 28/1/21 02:43, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Stephen Morris wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Three days ago I did a dnf system upgrade to apply all available > > > Fedora updates. I have now tried to start Plasma under Xorg, but it now > > > r

Re: Plasma on Xorg Fails to Start After Last System Update

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:09:19PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield via users wrote: > Per bug comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919696#c12, I'm > about > to try the fix that was pushed to updates-testing. The update to sddm-0.19.0-5.fc33.x86_64 fixed my problem :) Per the bug, instal

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

I had the same issue and this article worked for me.   https://support.thinkcritical.com/kb/articles/switch-windows-10-from-raid-ide-to-ahci On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:12 -0800, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Folks, >    I have a new dell laptop.  I tried to install Fedora 33 on it, but > it > failed t

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:25 PM Kevin Becker wrote: > I had the same issue and this article worked for me. > > > https://support.thinkcritical.com/kb/articles/switch-windows-10-from-raid-ide-to-ahci > Dell seems to be the "culprit". I have a Dell desktop where I had almost the same problem, exce

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

Yes, it was a Dell for me as well. I have an XPS 13 which is odd since you can buy it with Linux pre-loaded, but if you get the Windows version is ships with this weird RAID config by default. It has only one drive and I don’t even think there is an option for two so the RAID setting makes no

Re: Windows 10 + F33 + SSD + RAID

Folks,   I tried the process described in the article and it worked for me.  I can now boot up into Windows and Linux without issues. Thank you very much for the pointer. Paolo On 1/29/21 7:44 PM, Greg Woods wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:25 PM Kevin Becker

Re: auditd log processing tools?

sixpack13 wrote: >> to me it seems completely unnecessary. >> My comment is right under the comment I replied to. Ed Greshko: > You may think it is unnecessary. However, some people have their > email clients configured to display "unread" messages. When a reply > is sent sometime after the ori