Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Frank Elsner Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:34 AM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Sreyan Chakravarty On November 19, 2020 6:24:00 PM GMT+01:00, Sreyan Chakravarty < sreya...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, 10:52 pm F

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Sreyan Chakravarty Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 1:37 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Frank Elsner On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:34 AM Frank Elsner wrote: > > No. Command line. Manpage exists. > > Can you tell me any way t

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Frank Elsner Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:39 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Sreyan Chakravarty On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:37:08 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:34 AM Frank Elsner > wrote: > > >

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Sreyan Chakravarty Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:48 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Frank Elsner On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 3:39 pm Frank Elsner, wrote: > > Conversion can be done by lame, burning by growisofs. Wait.

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Frank Elsner Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:01 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Sreyan Chakravarty On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:48:10 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 3:39 pm Frank Elsner, wrote: > > > > >

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Sreyan Chakravarty Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:05 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Frank Elsner On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm Frank Elsner, wrote: > > > I use it to burn in ISO9660 format. I haben't used wodim for a

Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

-- Forwarded message - From: Frank Elsner Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:11 PM Subject: Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation To: Sreyan Chakravarty On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:05:46 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm Frank Elsner, wrote: > > > > >

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

Perhaps I overlooked, but I miss one line. About “query” I have also: allow-query { 0.0.0.0/0; ::1/128; 2001:470::/32; }; Perhaps allow-query { any; }; would be sufficient... From: "Tim via users" mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> Date: Friday, 20 November 2020 at 05:31:31 To: "users@list

Re: Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

Sreyan Chakravarty: >> Also when I am burning audio discs do the files need to be in the >> WAV format or can I directly burn MP3 and it will convert as needed? Frank Elsner: > It depends ... > > - When you want to burn a Audio-CD to be played by an (old-style) CD- > Player the files must be in W

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 11:34 +, J.Witvliet--- via users wrote: > Perhaps I overlooked, but I miss one line. > About “query” > > I have also: > allow-query { 0.0.0.0/0; ::1/128; 2001:470::/32; }; > > Perhaps allow-query { any; }; would be sufficient... Inside my options I have allow-query { an

Fwd: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:38 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > Edit /etc/lvm/lvm.conf, find the line in the "log {" section that has > "verbose = 0" and change it to "verbose = 1". Then run "dracut -f". > Reboot and at the grub menu, edit the boot entry, remove the "quiet > rhgb" parameters from the li

Re: Fwd: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:40 PM Tim via users wrote: > You're probably just missing MP3 support, even if some other > applications can play MP3s (some programs support it themselves, and > there's several different possible CODECs that are used by different > applications). > > I haven't bothered

Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:31 PM Frank Elsner wrote: > If it carrys an ISO9660 file system simpy mount it and play with any > player. > No that's not what I meant by reading. I meant before you actually write to a disc, you have to have the data from your original disc somewhere right ? What wo

Waterfox?

Hi All, Anyone have an experience with Waterfox? https://www.waterfox.net and do you like it? Also, any sign of RPM support for it out there anywhere? Many thanks, -T ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

Hi, I wanted to remove all LibreOffice components so I tried the following command: sudo dnf remove -y @libreoffice This resulted in: No packages marked for removal. Dependencies resolved. ===

Re: Waterfox?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:22 AM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Anyone have an experience with Waterfox? > https://www.waterfox.net > and do you like it? > I believe I used it once when I was trying out Debian. Why do you want to use it ? Why not

Re: Waterfox?

I've been using Waterfox-Classic as my main browser for a few years now, but keep Falkon around for those times when WC just won't cut it. My bank's website doesn't like WC, but most random sites seem to accept it. No rpm, but no problem with dependencies. ___

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 21/11/2020 04:54, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Why is there a blank group of LibreOffice ? Why aren't the required packages in it ? On my F33 system I get [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info @libreoffice Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:28 ago on Sat Nov 21 07:28:22 2020. Warning: Gr

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 2020-11-20 12:54, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Hi, I wanted to remove all LibreOffice components so I tried the following command:            sudo dnf remove -y @libreoffice This resulted in: No packages marked for removal. Dependencies resolved. ===

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-20 13:21, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 2:22 AM ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Hi All, Anyone have an experience with Waterfox? https://www.waterfox.net and do you like it? I believe I used it once when

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-20 14:39, Steven Usdansky via users wrote: I've been using Waterfox-Classic as my main browser for a few years now, but keep Falkon around for those times when WC just won't cut it. My bank's website doesn't like WC, but most random sites seem to accept it. No rpm, but no problem wi

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:02 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info @libreoffice > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:28 ago on Sat Nov 21 07:28:22 2020. > Warning: Group @libreoffice does not exist. > > but > > [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info LibreOffice > Last metadata

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:13 AM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I reported it to them a while back, but they blew me off. > Libre Office is not very good about taking bugs from > their users. > Wow. > > I would drop Libre Office, if I could. Soft Maker > looks

Re: Waterfox?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:16 AM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I have found it impossible to restrict myself to > only one browser. > I use Chrome and Firefox. But what advantages do you hope to gain by using Waterfox ? I can't see any potential benefit you woul

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-20 12:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Also, any sign of RPM support for it out there anywhere? Found this for RPMs: https://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home%3Ahawkeye116477%3Awaterfox&package=waterfox-classic-kpe ___ user

Re: Waterfox?

On 2020-11-20 16:12, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:16 AM ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: I have found it impossible to restrict myself to only one browser. I use Chrome and Firefox. But what advantages do you hope to gain

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 2020-11-20 16:10, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:13 AM ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: I reported it to them a while back, but they blew me off. Libre Office is not very good about taking bugs from their users. Wow.

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 21/11/2020 08:08, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 5:02 AM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info @libreoffice Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:28 ago on Sat Nov 21 07:28:22 2020. Warning: Group @libreoffice doe

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 11/20/20 3:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Libre Office also does not remove prior major releases of itself as does their Windows version.  Makes for a mess. You have to manually uninstall the old major release manually. How is this relevant in the Fedora context? If you are installin

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 11/20/20 3:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 21/11/2020 04:54, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Why is there a blank group of LibreOffice ? Why aren't the required packages in it ? On my F33 system I get [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info @libreoffice Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:28 ago

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 2020-11-20 17:00, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/20/20 3:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Libre Office also does not remove prior major releases of itself as does their Windows version.  Makes for a mess. You have to manually uninstall the old major release manually. How is this relevant in

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 21/11/2020 09:06, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/20/20 3:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 21/11/2020 04:54, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Why is there a blank group of LibreOffice ? Why aren't the required packages in it ? On my F33 system I get [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf group info @libreoffice Las

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 11/20/20 12:54 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: I wanted to remove all LibreOffice components so I tried the following command:            sudo dnf remove -y @libreoffice This resulted in: No packages marked for removal. Dependencies resolved.

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 6:15 AM Ed Greshko wrote: > > Have you had the chance to read the dnf man page? > > Each can be either a , which specifies > a package directly, or a @, which specifies an (environ‐ > ment) group which contains it. > > I did, but it is not clear (at least to me) about wh

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > When you're doing group commands, you don't use the "@". That's only > for package management commands to distinguish it from a package name. > > So what you mean to say is that when I am installing a group via dnf install the @ is required

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 7:17 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: > It's not blank. > > What do you mean it's not blank ? On my system it removes nothing and adds nothing. I'm not sure exactly what the reason is, but on my system, removing the > group only removes a few fringe packages. I tried adding and re

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 21/11/2020 09:37, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 6:15 AM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: Have you had the chance to read the dnf man page? Each can be either a , which specifies a package directly, or a @, which specifies an (environ‐

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 11/20/20 5:40 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Samuel Sieb > wrote: So what you mean to say is that when I am installing a group via dnf install the @ is required but when I am using dnf group install @ is not required since dnf already kno

Re: Why is the LibreOffice group blank ?

On 11/20/20 6:06 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 7:17 AM Samuel Sieb > wrote: It's not blank. What do you mean it's not blank ? On my system it removes nothing and adds nothing. dnf group info libreoffice If the packages are already insta