Re: Unable to start any VMs : Domain requires KVM, but it is not available.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:43 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > Additionally, you can also us the "lscpu" command which would show > something like for Intel processors. > > CPU min MHz: 1200. > BogoMIPS:5320.04 > Virtualization: VT-x > L1d ca

Re: Unable to start any VMs : Domain requires KVM, but it is not available.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:28 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > I would suspect the BIOS update decided to reset the virt flag. > I'd go through the BIOS settings and see if it is now disabled > (I've never understood why so many BIOSes hate having the virt > flag enabled. I even saw one system where you h

Re: Unable to start any VMs : Domain requires KVM, but it is not available.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 3:53 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > None that occur to me. I certainly didn't do anything special to get > this working. > It was not enabled in the BIOS. -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.f

Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

Hi, I use LVM with full disk encryption. I also use LVM snapshots, which have prevented me from completely bricking my entire system many times. Now the only problem is that the boot times when LVM snapshots are present are extremely long. I boot my machine, enter my encryption passphrase and th

Packagekit: too many packages to process

Hello! I ran into a problem where I'm not getting automatic updates in the way I would expect. I went looking in Gnome Software, and it shows me the button to reboot and apply updates, but clicking on it pops up an error, saying that the prepared update could not be found. Updating does not, of

Digest Version

I recently changed my e-mail and I want this list to be in Digest mode.  I have checked the list guidelines, sent an e-mail to users-h...@lists.fedoraproject.org, and everything else I can think of, but couldn't get it done on my own. Can the list admin change mf...@mflan.com to digest mode, ass

Re: Digest Version

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 06:14 -0600, Mike Flannigan wrote: > I recently changed my e-mail and I want this list to > be in Digest mode.  I have checked the list guidelines, > sent an e-mail to users-h...@lists.fedoraproject.org, and > everything else I can think of, but couldn't get it done > on my ow

Re: Digest Version

Yeah, if you have attachments to the list you probably don't want digest mode.  With discipline it works out pretty good for a list like this.  But it's incredibly aggravating to digest people when a digest person replies to the whole stack without trimming. My old e-mail address had digest mode

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On 19/11/2020 18:54, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: I use LVM with full disk encryption. I also use LVM snapshots, which have prevented me from completely bricking my entire system many times. Now the only problem is that the boot times when LVM snapshots are present are extremely long. I boot my

Re: Digest Version

On 19/11/2020 20:14, Mike Flannigan wrote: I recently changed my e-mail and I want this list to be in Digest mode.  I have checked the list guidelines, sent an e-mail to users-h...@lists.fedoraproject.org, and everything else I can think of, but couldn't get it done on my own. Can the list admi

Re: Packagekit: too many packages to process

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:33, Matti Pulkkinen wrote: > The other message first has a long list of packages, and then ends with "Too > many packages to process (7664/5200)". That is indeed a large number of packages; if you file an issue upstream we can bump the limit an order of magnitude. https

Re: Digest Version

Thanks for the reply.  I tried that but it won't let me in.  I tried my normal passwords, but I'm thinking I did not selected a password when I signed up. Mike On 11/19/20 7:18 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 19/11/2020 20:14, Mike Flannigan wrote: I recently changed my e-mail and I want this lis

Re: Digest Version

Mike Flannigan writes: > Thanks for the reply.  I tried that but it won't let > me in.  I tried my normal passwords, but I'm thinking > I did not selected a password when I signed up. In a stock Mailman you can do a password reset from the login screen (use the "forgot password" link). Of cou

Re: Digest Version

It's funny I didn't see that.  But unfortunately that is not working either.  It says "The e-mail address is not assigned to any user account" for both my e-mail addresses. mf...@mflan.com - new e-mail address mikef...@att.net - old e-mail address Mike On 11/19/20 7:40 AM, Stephen J. Turnbul

Re: Digest Version

Correction.  It says that for mikef...@att.net, which is correct since that is unsubscribed. It says Forbidden (403) CSRF verification failed. Request aborted. You are seeing this message because this site requires a CSRF cookie when submitting forms. This cookie is required for security re

Re: Digest Version

Well, I inserted an Exception to allow a cookie from https://lists.fedoraproject.org but that did not work either.  It is back to saying "The e-mail address is not assigned to any user account" for both e-mails. I guess I will just build my own digest version with a script. Not any ideal solutio

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. > Would you be having any idea as to where to put the --skip-mappings option in LVM ? Taken from here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2016-January/msg00010.html -- Regards,

Re: Digest Version

Hi, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 06:14 -0600, Mike Flannigan wrote: >> Does anybody know how to change to digest mode? > > No, and I don't know if the list supports it. It does. Subscribers can set one of several digest delivery methods in the "List-based preferences" of t

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > If you run "systemd-analyze blame" it should tell you what process is > taking the most time. > It seems the bug has existed since 2010: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604767 -- Regards, Sreyan Chakravarty __

Re: systemd-resolved breakage

There is another thread re systemd-resolved and adguard. Ed Greshko had a solution to use /etc/resolve.conf instead of the stub file systemd-resolved uses. "To revert to the previous behavior you need to remove the symbolic link lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 39 Sep 1 17:52 resolv.conf -> ../run/syst

Re: Digest Version

Hi, Mike Flannigan wrote: > Well, I inserted an Exception to allow a cookie from > https://lists.fedoraproject.org > but that did not work either.  It is back to saying > "The e-mail address is not assigned to any user account" > for both e-mails. I set your address (@mflan.com) to MIME digests m

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Ed Greshko wrote: > If you run "systemd-analyze blame" it should tell you what process is > taking the most time. > These are the top 10 entries from "systemd-analyze blame": 1 3min 26.155s dracut-initqueue.service 2 38.577s udisks2.service 3 29

Re: Digest Version

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 09:16 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > The MIME digests option works reasonably well, though.  For > someone who wants to receive messages in a digest mode, > that's worth trying.  If someone is using a poor email > client where MIME digests don't work, then I can only advise >

Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

Hi, I have a 10 year old car with a CD player, I use to burn discs using Brasero on GNOME which used to work fine in my old CD player. But recently after upgrading to the latest Fedora 32 I find that whatever audio disc I burn with Brasero or K3b for that matter, doesn't work in my car. Can some

Re: Audio Disc Burning software recommendation

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 22:39:59 +0530 Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 10 year old car with a CD player, I use to burn discs using > Brasero on GNOME which used to work fine in my old CD player. > > But recently after upgrading to the latest Fedora 32 I find that whatever > audio disc I

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 9:12 PM Tim via users wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:33 -0800, Jack Craig wrote: > > zone: /var/named/internal > > > > > > internal. 86400 IN SOA ws.linuxlighthouse.com. > > root.linuxlighthouse.com. 2020101601 86400 3600 604800 86400 > > internal. 86400 IN NS

Re: Digest Version

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:10:37AM -0600, Mike Flannigan wrote: > > Well, I inserted an Exception to allow a cookie from > https://lists.fedoraproject.org > but that did not work either.  It is back to saying > "The e-mail address is not assigned to any user account" > for both e-mails. > > I gue

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On 11/19/20 6:39 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Ed Greshko > wrote: If you run "systemd-analyze blame" it should tell you what process is taking the most time. These are the top 10 entries from "systemd-analyze blame":   1

Re: Digest Version

Thank you.  I did get it done. Mike On 11/19/20 1:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:10:37AM -0600, Mike Flannigan wrote: So, I suspect what you are doing is: Going to: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/accounts/login/?next=/admin/lists/users.lists.fedoraproject.org/ and the

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 11:15 -0800, Jack Craig wrote: > my internal.db keeps giving out of zone errors. do you have input for > the internal view as you did for external view? what am i missing? Asking the obvious questions: Are you restarting the named service after you've made changes to configu

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug

On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 11:15 -0800, Jack Craig wrote: > your below has resulted na god external.view, but my internal.db > keeps giving out of zone errors. > do you have input for the internal view as you did for external view? > what am i missing? I've done the following tests on my name server:

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 1:28 am Samuel Sieb, wrote: > > > That's the process in the initrd that tries to find and mount the root > filesystem, so that makes sense. The problem is somewhere in there. > ___ > > > What else can I do to debug this problem?? _

Re: Unusually long boot times with LVM Snapshots

On 11/19/20 10:45 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, 1:28 am Samuel Sieb, > wrote: That's the process in the initrd that tries to find and mount the root filesystem, so that makes sense.  The problem is somewhere in there. _