On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
$ cd .config
[tony@rn6 .config]$ find . -cmin 1
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Default
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Default/Cookies
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Default/Local
On 2020-05-30 15:09, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-05-30 09:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> $ cd .config
>>> [tony@rn6 .config]$ find . -cmin 1
>>> ./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser
>>> ./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Default
>>> ./BraveSoftware/B
On 3/5/20 2:20 am, Bob Goodwin wrote:
.
I installed "ConfigDate" add-on in Thunderbird but can not find the
configuration menu? Primarily I want to set it to provide the senders
time and offset. Not critical but I always use that option and find of
interest. The only options see are disable
On 2020-05-30 00:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:09, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
$ cd .config
[tony@rn6 .config]$ find . -cmin 1
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser
./BraveSoftware/Brave-Browser/Defaul
Hi,
upgrading to the with the most recent f32 updates with dnf fails:
sudo dnf upgrade
Last metadata expiration check: 0:56:44 ago on Sat May 30 08:16:52 2020.
Dependencies resolved.
=
On 2020-05-30 15:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-05-30 00:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-05-30 15:09, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> $ cd .config
> [tony@rn6 .config]$ find . -c
On 2020-05-30 00:36, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-05-30 00:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:09, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
$ cd .config
[tony@rn6
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 10:46:18 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/28/20 9:19 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > It's quite possible that Suvayu Ali is one of the many users that cannot
> > install Fedora 31, because it doesn't work on their hardware. Fedora 30
> > was the last release to support
On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote:
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
> transaction.
> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
> Error: Transaction test error:
> file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attemp
On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote:
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/share/doc/manual/g
On 2020-05-30 16:03, Joachim Backes wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
>>> transaction.
>>> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
>>>
Update
I just got this task done.
I did not use Pandas, mainly because I wanted to work in SQL with a real
database instead of a CSV file.
I used sqliteBrowser to import the data from the CSV file. It worked well
except that it got the data type wrong on some of the 150+ columns (fields)
and I ha
On 5/30/20 1:03 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote:
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Transaction
On Fri, 29 May 2020 13:56:34 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> I don't believe the kernel.org developers work out of the fedora
> bugzilla (or any distro's bugzilla), so no one who knows anything is
> likely to find and/or see the bug.
>
> To get a kernel developer you would need to at least post a sum
On Fri, 29 May 2020 21:08:10 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> The maintainers are for the most part about "packaging" kernels.
> They rarely seem to ever work on kernel bugs, nor have the time to do
> such investigate even if they have the time.
If that were true, something would be even more wrong i
On Sat, 30 May 2020 09:33:11 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Error: Transaction test error:
> file /usr/share/doc/manual/gnutls.html conflicts between attempted
> installs of gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.i686 and
> gnutls-devel-3.6.13-4.fc32.x86_64
> file /usr/share/info/gnutls.info-3.gz conf
On 2020-05-30 10:28, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/30/20 1:03 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 2020-05-30 09:45, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-30 15:33, Joachim Backes wrote:
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next
successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executin
Am 30.05.20 um 03:20 schrieb Ed Greshko:
> [egreshko@meimei .config]$ find . -cmin 1
I'd make that find . -cmin -1
Granted, for a value of 1 it won't make a difference but the difference
becomes apparent for values >= 2. While
find . -cmin 2
finds files with a status change time of *exactly* 2 m
30.05.20, 09:09 CEST ToddAndMargo via users:
> On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Did you make a change within 1 minute?
>
> no, but I also tried -cmin 60 too
... which will search for files with a status change time of *exactly*
60 minutes ago.
To find files with a status change time of
On 2020-05-30 03:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Bob,
It seems that Configdate has been withdrawn by it author. A
suggested replacement seems to be Enhanced Date Formatter. I not sure
whether this will do what you want as I can't try it because I use
Thunderbird Daily and there isn't a vers
My background is I have been used Fedora since Core 1, and prior to
that started with Redhat 5/6/7/8/9 and managed (or was technical lead
for a team) with >1000 installed running combinations of RHEL, Centos,
non-enterprise Redhat/Fedora, and/or SLES since around 1998, in
addition to running a few
Today my wife's windows10 lenovo laptop was not starting normally, cycling
through various "repair" screens. It does seem to work at least
minimally though.
I tried booting of my f32 usb stick and thought maybe I could take a look at
the SSD. But when I start gnome disks, the internal SSD does
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 00:40:27 -0700,
"John M. Harris Jr" wrote:
Yes, the other option would be to move to Debian or find another rpm-based
distro that still supports 32 bit. All of this because Fedora decided to do
what seems to be so common recently, dropping what still works well. This
hu
Hi Bruno,
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:11 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
[...]
> I think that covers most of it. It isn't really as bad as it looks
> written out.
Thank you so much for sharing it! I can work with this, maybe some of
it could also be automated leveraging copr ;)
--
Suvayu
Open source
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 7:41 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Yes, the other option would be to move to Debian or find another rpm-based
> distro that still supports 32 bit. All of this because Fedora decided to do
> what seems to be so common recently, dropping what still works well. This
> hurts ou
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Roger Heflin wrote:
> those workstations would be the expensive cards. A yearly redhat
> support license is enough that no one is going to buy one for a $1000
> machine because in 3 years that license will cost more than the HW, so
> the "cheap" hardware that is
On Sat, 30 May 2020 07:33:04 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> My background is I have been used Fedora since Core 1, and prior to
> that started with Redhat 5/6/7/8/9 and managed (or was technical lead
> for a team) with >1000 installed running combinations of RHEL, Centos,
> non-enterprise Redhat/Fed
You really need to understand the devs actual motivations. And your
are attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded outside
of the Fedora community.
Lenovo will be supporting Fedora on their laptops. They are the OEM
and will provide the heavy lifting (with enterprise distribution
I installed Fedora 32 on an SD card on my MS Surface GO. I can get it to
boot up fine (but the surface has a funky UEFI bios) but no Wifi. The only
leads I can find are:
https://support.killernetworking.com/knowledge-base/installing-the-killer-wireless-ac-1535-in-steamos/
https://hackmd.io/@dasgee
On Sat, 30 May 2020 11:14:22 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> You really need to understand the devs actual motivations. And your
> are attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded outside
> of the Fedora community.
Please, think outside the box. It isn't helpful to the discussion, if
On 5/30/20 8:36 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Today my wife's windows10 lenovo laptop was not starting normally, cycling
> through various "repair" screens. It does seem to work at least
> minimally though.
>
> I tried booting of my f32 usb stick and thought maybe I could take a look at
> the SSD. B
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 13:17, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I installed Fedora 32 on an SD card on my MS Surface GO. I can get it to
> boot up fine (but the surface has a funky UEFI bios) but no Wifi.
>
Normally dmesg should give some indication of why the wifi fails.
> The only leads I can find are:
On 5/30/20 1:19 PM, ITwrx wrote:
> On 5/30/20 8:36 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Today my wife's windows10 lenovo laptop was not starting normally, cycling
>> through various "repair" screens. It does seem to work at least
>> minimally though.
>>
>> I tried booting of my f32 usb stick and thought may
Hello,
How can I create a Fedora live from the previously downloaded iso file
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso ?
Before it was easy.
It seems that with Fedora Media writer, I first need to re-download the
image.
Thanks
On 5/30/20 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
How can I create a Fedora live from the previously downloaded iso file
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso ?
Before it was easy.
It seems that with Fedora Media writer, I first need to re-download the
image.
I prefer to use lived-iso-to-disk from
dnf search lived-iso-to-disk
Last metadata expiration check: 6 days, 5:58:16 ago on Tue 19 May 2020 10:15:19
PM CEST.
No matches found.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoi
On 2020-05-31 03:02, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> dnf search lived-iso-to-disk
> Last metadata expiration check: 6 days, 5:58:16 ago on Tue 19 May 2020
> 10:15:19 PM CEST.
> No matches found.
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf whatprovides livecd-iso-to-disk
Last metadata expiration check: 16:01:20 ago on Sat 30
On 5/30/20 12:02 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
dnf search lived-iso-to-disk
Last metadata expiration check: 6 days, 5:58:16 ago on Tue 19 May 2020 10:15:19
PM CEST.
No matches found.
I should have been more explicit. I wrote "lived-iso-to-disk from the
livecd-tools", I should have said "the livec
On 2020-05-30 04:24, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
30.05.20, 09:09 CEST ToddAndMargo via users:
On 2020-05-29 19:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
Did you make a change within 1 minute?
no, but I also tried -cmin 60 too
... which will search for files with a status change time of *exactly*
60 minutes ago
On 2020-05-30 04:24, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Am 30.05.20 um 03:20 schrieb Ed Greshko:
[egreshko@meimei .config]$ find . -cmin 1
I'd make that find . -cmin -1
Granted, for a value of 1 it won't make a difference but the difference
becomes apparent for values >= 2. While
find . -cmin 2
finds
When is this thread scheduled for EOL?
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 18:44 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 11:14:22 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > You really need to understand the devs actual motivations. And
> > yourare attributing things to Fedora devels that are being funded
> >
On 5/29/20 2:12 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 00:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/27/20 3:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
Is that the only references to rfkill? Did the log start at boot up?
Try searching also for "KILL", it's likely in the wif
The policy means nothing when the staffing is not there to actually do the
tasks. And clearly there is limited staffing. And if they are a volenteer
then tell them they arent doing their job and kick them out. Repeat until
there is no community and you have no staff. Policy is theory of what
sh
On 5/30/20 5:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/29/20 2:12 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 00:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 5/27/20 3:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
>>>
>
> The "hard" block should only come from hardware. If it was
> NetworkM
Having started with RH 5.1, and now on Fedora 31, I find this thread
enlightening, entertaining, and relevant.
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 17:19, Kevin Becker wrote:
>
> When is this thread scheduled for EOL?
>
>
> On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 18:44 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 11:1
On 5/30/20 2:44 PM, Lester M Petrie wrote:
On 5/30/20 5:25 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/29/20 2:12 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 00:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/27/20 3:46 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
The "hard" block should only come fro
On Sat, 30 May 2020 at 10:37, Neal Becker wrote:
> Today my wife's windows10 lenovo laptop was not starting normally, cycling
> through various "repair" screens. It does seem to work at least
> minimally though.
>
I've seen this with older version of Windows. The "repair" may have
repaired the
47 matches
Mail list logo
