Hi All,
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages of
/usr/bin/h4cc and /usr/bin/h4fc.
Does anyone has an idea which othe
On 11/7/19 5:11 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages of
/usr/bin/h4cc and /usr/bin/h4fc.
Do
Ed Greshko 7-NOV-2019 10:53:43.94
>On 11/7/19 5:11 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
>> When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
>> process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
>> hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packa
On 11/7/19 6:04 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
Ed Greshko 7-NOV-2019 10:53:43.94
On 11/7/19 5:11 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails
On 11/7/19 6:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On an F31 system and it seems like netcdf is the most logical choice.
On my F31, I get
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires hdf
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:51 ago on Thu 07 Nov 2019 06:28:30 PM CST.
bes-0:3.20.5-1.fc31.i686
bes-0:3.2
Ed Greshko wrote on 7-NOV-2019 12:04:26.12
>On 11/7/19 6:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>> On an F31 system and it seems like netcdf is the most logical choice.
I removed the netcdf*.i686 packeages and that solved the problem.
>>
>> On my F31, I get
>>
>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf repoquery --whatre
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 18:46 +, Petr Menšík wrote:
>
> What is "it"? Kindly follow long-standing convention and quote the part
> of a message you are responding to. HyperKitty does NOT do this
> automatically.
>
> poc
Oh, right, thanks. Overlooked quote button on HyperKitty.
This is I was
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:23:52 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/6/19 10:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:04:53 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/5/19 1:34 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> Thanks very much. We may have been looking at different posts, so I would
> >>> appre
On 11/7/19 1:11 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages of
/usr/bin/h4cc and /usr/bin/h4fc.
T
On 11/7/19 10:28 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/7/19 1:11 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the
upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these
packa
Hi.
Doing a project that will end in a live web/mobile app with live
customers/data/etc. I'm going to need remote sysAdmin functionality to
pull this off. I realize I could "stumble" my way through, but given
that the project will impact users, I don't want to screw this up.
So, I'm looking to ge
On 11/06/19 13:46, Bob Goodwin wrote:
In an attempt to install a Fedora 30 Notecase Pro rpm in °fedora 31 I
find that it requires "libunique-1.0.so" and I was unable to find that
with dnf.
.
I queried the Notecase Pro creator and he immediately made a new version
available for Fedora-31. Ins
Hello, this is the first time I participate in a mailing list.
Today I attempted installing Fedora Workstation on a friend's computer
and there were some peculiar quirks to the process.
- Anaconda-installer asked me for a 2MB boot partition
- the resulting install had no /sys/firmware/efi.
Fedo
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:41:51 +0200
Kad Zayar via users wrote:
> altering Windows partitions is not something he's comfortable with,
> while reinstalling Fedora is not a problem (he still hasn't made it
> his own).
You will have to re-install Fedora to get a UEFI install. I don't
think there is
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 14:59 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 23:41:51 +0200
> Kad Zayar via users wrote:
>
> > altering Windows partitions is not something he's comfortable with,
> > while reinstalling Fedora is not a problem (he still hasn't made it
> > his own).
>
> You will
On 29/10/19 8:47 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me how I add a Google Cloud Printer to cups once
I have the cupscloudprint package installed?
Sorry I forgot to mention this is in F30. I found instructions for the
service but the service fails when started.
Thankyou.
On 11/8/19 9:32 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 29/10/19 8:47 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me how I add a Google Cloud Printer to cups once I have
the cupscloudprint package installed?
Sorry I forgot to mention this is in F30. I found instructions for the service
but the
On 8/11/19 12:41 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/8/19 9:32 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 29/10/19 8:47 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me how I add a Google Cloud Printer to cups
once I have the cupscloudprint package installed?
Sorry I forgot to mention this is in F30. I found
On 11/8/19 12:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 8/11/19 12:41 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/8/19 9:32 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 29/10/19 8:47 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me how I add a Google Cloud Printer to cups once I have
the cupscloudprint package installed?
Sorr
Tim:
>> For instance, your computer could set your clock for you properly,
>> fully automatically, if it knew where you were.
Ed Greshko:
> That, of course, would require a "public IP" address.
Potentially doable with IPv6, if it were fully supported. My ISP
doesn't support it, at all.
> And, n
On 11/8/19 1:09 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
For instance, your computer could set your clock for you properly,
fully automatically, if it knew where you were.
Ed Greshko:
That, of course, would require a "public IP" address.
Potentially doable with IPv6, if it were fully supported. My ISP
Thank you!
I wrote that post from memory, so please excuse the mistake with the grub2
switch, without that switch the correct kernel is returned as the default boot
kernel.
While I could remove the Fedora 30 kernel(s), that doesn't fix the problem. As
soon as I end up with 3 bootable kernels
I just tested removing one of the old kernels again. It is still stubbornly
booting the 3rd entry, which is now the Recovery option!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.
On 11/7/19 10:20 PM, Not Random wrote:
While I could remove the Fedora 30 kernel(s), that doesn't fix the problem. As
soon as I end up with 3 bootable kernels again it always selects the wrong one!
/etc/default/grub contains:
GRUB_DEFAULT=saved
which as you say is the default for Fedora.
Wha
I bet it's something to do with the change to BootLoaderSpec-style
configuration files in fedora 30!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to u
Thanks!
# grub2-editenv list
saved_entry=2dc3a3c6f8494c8fb93c27f99dc3a246-5.3.8-300.fc31.x86_64
boot_success=1
boot_indeterminate=0
kernelopts=root=UUID=ac6336b1-7fd2-43d7-af44-51b592f3ab8f ro rhgb quiet
For reference, I now have 2 Fedora 31 kernels:
# rpm -q kernel
kernel-5.3.7-301.fc31.x86_64
26 matches
Mail list logo
