Re: repositories very out-of-date for Thunderbird version?

Hi, Am 17.09.19 um 04:08 schrieb home user: I very recently asked a question in the Thunderbird support forum. One person replied "Find yourself an updated Thunderbird...". I have version 60.7.0; the person implied that the current version is 68. That's 8 versions out-of-date.  I do a "dnf up

Re: Icon on screen FRitzBox Fedora 30.

Am 04.09.19 um 18:28 schrieb Ger van Dijck: I have a maybe stupid question : I use a Fritz-Box 7490 and try to install Icons on screen : fritz.nas , fritz.mediaserver , myfritz , but one way or another I do not manage this item . Is there a solution ? Did you manage to solve your problem? I

Re: Finding various broken symbolic links?

On 9/16/19 7:34 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: Have run find . -xtype l in past on systems in various directories to find bad links. Recently did it from the root directory on a few systems, and found a number of bad links. Not sure if these are just left over links from updates? Exa

Re: pip and python version

Am 31.08.19 um 02:45 schrieb George N. White III: The changelog indicates support for python 2 and 3.  The docs mention using WeasyPrint to generate PDF's, -- also appears not to have fedora packages. Weasyprint is packaged in Fedora - though with an pretty old version: https://src.fedoraproje

Re: pip and python version

Am 29.08.19 um 22:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: So no more just pip.  It is pip3. Not 100% correct. In newer Fedora versions "/usr/bin/pip" refers to the Python 3 version of "pip". No need to use "pip3". Actually F32 does not contain any Python 2 version of "pip" at all. (I could only check "

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > Well, I just installed a F31 gnome VM and found that updates and installs > using the gnome-software util do what I recall it not doing in the past. The OP is using F29, not the (unlreleased) F31. Don't know if that makes any difference in th

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On 9/17/19 6:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 09:46 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Well, I just installed a F31 gnome VM and found that updates and installs using the gnome-software util do what I recall it not doing in the past. The OP is using F29, not the (unlreleased) F31.

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On Mon, 2019-09-16 at 13:10 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > If that didn't work, then run "journalctl --list-boots" and find the > one for the right time. Then run "journalctl -b -1" (again replace > with the right number). Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed try to use G

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed try to use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And it seems to give me the log from the failed software update. I found the following in the log that looks quite suspicious pyt

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed > > try to > > use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And it > > seems > > to give me the log from the failed software

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On 9/17/19 8:52 PM, Robin Lee wrote: On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a failed try to use Gnome Software to update to latest software packages. And it seems to give me the log from t

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 21:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 8:52 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 20:45 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 9/17/19 8:21 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > Thanks for the help. I did run "journalctl -b -1" after a > > > > failed > > > > try to > > > > use

Re: Finding various broken symbolic links?

The output from find . -xtype l on my Fedora 29 notebook. ./home/msetzerii/.local/share/akonadi/socket-localhost.localdomain ./home/msetzerii/.local/share/akonadi/socket-setzconote.dyndns.org ./home/msetzerii/.kde/tmp-setzconote.dyndns.org ./home/msetzerii/.kde/socket-localhost.localdomain ./home/

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On 9/17/19 9:10 PM, Robin Lee wrote: But, what about the error message I pointed out earlier TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable The part of error you quoted earlier was dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dnf- plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 404, in configu

firefox 69 and css

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, While upgrading to firefox 69, the css syntax to configure firefox seems to have been changed (once more. programmers think that people have time to waste!) . Once upon a time, I found the syntax to have my tab-bar below the other bars (

Re: firefox 69 and css

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte < francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bonjour, > > While upgrading to firefox 69, the css syntax to configure firefox > seems to have been changed (once more. programmers think that >

Re: firefox 69 and css

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/09/2019 à 17:43, Ted Roche a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte > > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Bonjour, > > While upgrading to firefox 69, t

Re: repositories very out-of-date for Thunderbird version? [CLOSED]

(responding to a few posts) (Samuel) > Thunderbird 68 was built September 6, so it might not be out > of testing yet. You can add "--enablerepo-updates-testing" > to dnf if it's not available in updates yet. (Gordon) > No, Thunderbird 60 is not 8 versions out-of-date. There was > no major relea

Re: Gnome Software Updater no longer working

On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 22:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/17/19 9:10 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > But, what about the error message I pointed out earlier > > TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable > > The part of error you quoted earlier was > > dnf[1168]: File "/usr/lib/python3.7

Re: firefox 69 and css

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:05:55 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Le 17/09/2019 à 17:43, Ted Roche a écrit : > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:59 AM François Patte > > cite: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/69.0/releasenotes/ > > OK! Fine! So I follow the instructions > > about:config > yes I w

Re: Finding various broken symbolic links?

On 9/17/19 6:30 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: The output from find . -xtype l on my Fedora 29 notebook. Did you try using "rpm -qf" to check if they are owned? ./home/msetzerii/.local/share/akonadi/socket-localhost.localdomain ./home/msetzerii/.local/share/akonadi/socket-setzconote.dyndns.o

Re: ssh

On Saturday, September 14, 2019 10:13:11 AM EDT Ed Greshko wrote: > On 9/14/19 9:59 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > >> On 9/14/19 9:34 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > telnet 192.168.1.12 > > Trying 192.168.1.12... > > telnet: connect to address 192.168.1.12: No route to host > > > > I guess that I need to

Re: ssh

On Saturday, September 14, 2019 1:19:05 PM EDT Patrick Dupre wrote: > Here is the bizarre thing: > from a gnome-shell > telnet 192.168.1.12 22 > Trying 192.168.1.12... > Connected to 192.168.1.12. > Escape character is '^]'. > SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_8.0 This means you have a route and that sshd is listen

Re: ssh

Not necessarily. You can certainly get "No route to host", rather than "Connection failed" if the port is not open. On September 17, 2019 9:05:34 PM UTC, "Garry T. Williams" wrote: >On Saturday, September 14, 2019 10:13:11 AM EDT Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 9/14/19 9:59 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: >>

Re: ssh

On 9/18/19 5:05 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote: On Saturday, September 14, 2019 10:13:11 AM EDT Ed Greshko wrote: On 9/14/19 9:59 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: On 9/14/19 9:34 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: telnet 192.168.1.12 Trying 192.168.1.12... telnet: connect to address 192.168.1.12: No route to host

Re: ssh

On 9/18/19 5:09 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote: ssh 192.168.1.12 22 time out Ed has told you what is wrong here. But, not in the way you're suggesting. It is obvious that a connection is not being established.  Had it been the error would not have been "time out". It would have been. [egreshko

Trouble removing metasploit

Hi All, What am I doing wrong here? $ rpm -qa metas\* metasploit-framework-5.0.43+20190827102505~1rapid7-1.el6.x86_64 # dnf remove metasploit-framework No match for argument: metasploit-framework No packages marked for removal. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! # dnf remove 'met

Re: Trouble removing metasploit

On 9/17/19 5:36 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, What am I doing wrong here? $ rpm -qa metas\* metasploit-framework-5.0.43+20190827102505~1rapid7-1.el6.x86_64 # dnf remove metasploit-framework No match for argument: metasploit-framework No packages marked for removal. Dependencies re