This is for my broadcom wifi from non-free rpmfusion.
It seems a bad thing for me to do this update.
Recommendations?
thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fe
I had to run
[code]grub2-switch-to-blscfg[/code]
and now kernel entries are automatically updated.
Maybe when installing grub it wasn't even necessary to generate grub.cfg
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
On 7/15/19 5:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> This is for my broadcom wifi from non-free rpmfusion.
>
> It seems a bad thing for me to do this update.
>
> Recommendations?
>
> thanks
Maybe show us what you're seeing?
[root@f29bk ~]# uname -r
5.1.16-300.fc30.x86_64
[root@f29bk ~]# rpm -q kmod-wl
Installing:
kernel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates 15 k
kernel-core x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates 26 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates 13 M
kernel-modules x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 update
HI.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:33:04 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Installing:
> kernel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates15 k
...
> Removing:
> kernel x86_64 5.1.12-300.fc30 @updates0
...
> Removing dependent packages:
> kmod-wl-5.1
On 7/15/19 8:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Installing:
> kernel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates15 k
> kernel-corex86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates26 M
> kernel-devel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates13 M
> kernel-
On 7/15/19 9:11 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
HI.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:33:04 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Installing:
kernel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates15 k
...
Removing:
kernel x86_64 5.1.12-300.fc30 @updates
On 7/15/19 9:22 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 7/15/19 8:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Installing:
kernel x86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates15 k
kernel-corex86_64 5.1.17-300.fc30 updates26 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.1.17-
Thank-you, Tim, for the follow-up.
> > 'If that line says the "from" is reasonable,
> > look at the lines up to and inclucing the
> > next Received: line and loop, otherwise
> > stop, it's spam.'
> I think he means:
> 1. Look at the lines up to and including the next received line.
> 2. Repeat t
On 7/15/19 10:20 AM, home user via users wrote:
are almost certainly malicious and should not be responded to or
forwarded, should not have links in them clicked or attachments to them
downloaded, perhaps should be reported to appropriate authorities, and
certainly should deleted. Those are no
On 7/14/19 7:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 7/15/19 9:14 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/14/19 4:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 7/15/19 7:01 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I heard o a you tube video about a file sharing technique
called gfs. I may has misunderstood the letters as I
have t
Tim:
>> I think he means:
>> 1. Look at the lines up to and including the next received line.
>> 2. Repeat the process, upwards.
>> 3. Otherwise, stop looking any further, it's spam.
Bill:
> Parse Error! My mind incorrectly parsed what Tony said.
I didn't find the language too clear, either. Bu
On 7/15/19 8:28 PM, Tim via users wrote:
One day someone might think to create a plug-in that checks links with
two different addresses in such links, and red flags them.
Thunderbird warns me about some links. I'm not sure what its criteria
are, but it asks if I'm sure that I want to go to th
13 matches
Mail list logo
