Re: [F29] Ext4 file system inconsistencies

2019-02-01 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 01.02.19 08:56, Marco Guazzone wrote: > It happened again. > This time with kernel 4.20.4-200.fc29.x86_64. Did you run memtest in the meantime? Best regards Ulf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to u

Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Bob Goodwin
When I start Thunar I have a column at the left that displays DEVICES, PLACES, and NETWORKS with a few sub-folders under each. This box was a new install. On a second Fedora 29 computer this left hand column is missing and I have had no success finding the difference between the two. This was

Re: After an update, VM's no longer have Internet access

2019-02-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 22:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 1/30/19 9:31 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I hesitate to wimp out and reinstall it, > > but I'm running out of ideas. > > Before doing that I think I would create a couple of new F29 VM's and see if > the new ones > exhibit the same i

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Joe Zeff
On 02/01/2019 10:46 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: When I start Thunar I have a column at the left that displays DEVICES, PLACES, and NETWORKS with a few sub-folders under each. This box was a new install. On a second Fedora 29 computer this left hand column is missing and I have had no success findi

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Bob Goodwin
On 02/01/19 13:03, Joe Zeff wrote: Click on View, Side Pane and make sure that one of the two options is checked. The menu bar is missing unless I bring up something like Firefox or Thunderbird. When I bring up a terminal I have to click on show menu to get it? I can find no way to get the to

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Joe Zeff
On 02/01/2019 11:23 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote: On 02/01/19 13:03, Joe Zeff wrote: Click on View, Side Pane and make sure that one of the two options is checked. The menu bar is missing unless I bring up something like Firefox or Thunderbird. When I bring up a terminal I have to click on show menu

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Bob Goodwin
On 02/01/19 13:42, Joe Zeff wrote: ring up a terminal I have to click on show menu to get it? I can find no way to get the tool/menu bar at the top with Thunar. ___ This looks like an Xfce issue.  Try asking at http://forum.xfce.org/index.php _ I think I found the termina

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:23:30PM -0500, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > On 02/01/19 13:03, Joe Zeff wrote: > > Click on View, Side Pane and make sure that one of the two options is > > checked. > The menu bar is missing unless I bring up something like Firefox or > Thunderbird. When I bring up a termi

Re: Fedora 29 display -

2019-02-01 Thread Bob Goodwin
On 02/01/19 14:25, Jon LaBadie wrote: Try "/usr/bin/thunar-settings". . That just brings up the GUI menu which I have been through before and now again. The settings there are the same in both computers but the column I want is missing from the second computer ... NETWORK at the bottom of th

Re: After an update, VM's no longer have Internet access

2019-02-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2/2/19 1:55 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > They both show *the same MAC address*: 52:54:00:8b:88:60, which looks > at least suspicious. Then after less than a minute I ran 'arp' on each > of them again, and they both returned a hardware address of > '(incomplete)'. That is rather strange. If

Re: After an update, VM's no longer have Internet access

2019-02-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 17:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > They both show *the same MAC address*: 52:54:00:8b:88:60, which looks > at least suspicious. Correction: the address being shown (while arp is still working) is that of the gateway, so naturally it's the same in both guests. poc

Re: After an update, VM's no longer have Internet access

2019-02-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2/2/19 6:13 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 17:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> They both show *the same MAC address*: 52:54:00:8b:88:60, which looks >> at least suspicious. > Correction: the address being shown (while arp is still working) is > that of the gateway,