Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
LVM on bare metal? I'm trying to test behaviour like a network
attached physical volume going missing (actually, a network mounted
virtual disc image). The normal loopback approach to testing falls a
bit short, while overwriting
Once upon a time, Ian Malone said:
> Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
> LVM on bare metal?
Actually make a volume go missing? The easiest way to do that would be
USB volumes (thumb drives), and just yank the drive out. Even if you
don't want to physically p
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 09:25 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 1/3/19 9:13 AM, William Oliver wrote:
> > I just bought a brand new little HP laptop and decided to try to
> > install Fedora 29. I created the bootable flash drive in Windows
> > using
> > Rufus. When I try to boot from the flash drive,
I just installed Fedora29 on my brand new HP laptop. The installation
went fine, and Fedora comes up fine. However, I was trying to install
it as a dual boot machine, and the Windows option does not come up
either with a "normal" grub bootup or when I choose boot options in
BIOS.
THe box has hyb
echo 1 > /sys/block/sdX/device/delete
And the device should disappear.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:01 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Ian Malone said:
> > Does anyone have suggestions for easily simulating a missing volume in
> > LVM on bare metal?
>
> Actually make a volume go missin
On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 12:44 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
> I just installed Fedora29 on my brand new HP laptop. The
> installation
> went fine, and Fedora comes up fine. However, I was trying to
> install
> it as a dual boot machine, and the Windows option does not come up
> either with a "normal
Hi
I have a desktop and a laptop, both with fully updated Fedora 29. The
laptop is a fresh installation while the desktop has been upgraded from
previous versions of Fedora. And I have Josm installed on both.
Now the problem is that on the desktop Josm has become really slow. You
need some seriou
On 1/3/19 10:41 AM, William Oliver wrote:
So, here's an easier (I hope) question. I remember back in the day,
when I would power up my machine in dual boot mode, grub would give me
a grub menu that let me choose the OS. Now, it just comes up in
Windows. If I want to boot into Fedora, I have to
On 1/3/19 1:05 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a desktop and a laptop, both with fully updated Fedora 29. The
> laptop is a fresh installation while the desktop has been upgraded from
> previous versions of Fedora. And I have Josm installed on both.
>
> Now the problem is that on the desktop
I just upgraded to F29 from F28 yesterday.
The current kernel that I am running according to uname -r is:
4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64
However when I run "dnf upgrade" today I get the following dependencies
to be installed:
Installing dependencies:
kernel-core x86_64 4.19.
> The current kernel that I am running according to uname -r is:
>
> 4.19.12-301.fc29.x86_64
>
> However when I run "dnf upgrade" today I get the following dependencies
> to be installed:
>
> Installing dependencies:
> kernel-core x86_64 4.19.13-
> 300.fc29 u
Open mouth and insert foot. :-)
I was was not paying attention Computers can sure make one look
pretty stupid!!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
On 12/31/18 6:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
When it happened before I edited the XML file to remove the .osxsave
flag and that solved the problem. However now it's happening with a
fresh VM so there's no XML file to edit.
Try commenting out that feature in /usr/share/libvirt/cpu_map.xml
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
