Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 08:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 12/1/18 6:33 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I'm getting "filesystem not responding" messages from an NFS-mounted > > NAS which I suspect is just slow (it spins down its disks when not in > > use). I'm using automount and that appears to

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On 12/1/18 5:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 08:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 12/1/18 6:33 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> I'm getting "filesystem not responding" messages from an NFS-mounted >>> NAS which I suspect is just slow (it spins down its disks when not in

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 18:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > I know you have it working > > > > > > But I did verify that unmounting and remounting with a changed parameter > > > has no effect. > > Except that it did have an effect. I used 'umount -f ...' and then > > 'mount -a' and it worked.

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On 12/1/18 7:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 18:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: I know you have it working But I did verify that unmounting and remounting with a changed parameter has no effect. >>> Except that it did have an effect. I used 'umount -f

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 19:18 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 12/1/18 7:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 18:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > > I know you have it working > > > > > > > > > > But I did verify that unmounting and remounting with a changed > > > > > para

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On 12/1/18 7:55 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Without the '-f' it simply wouldn't unmount for me (it just sat there), > so maybe your setup is different. Either way it's working now so thanks > anyway. Good. I have had very little, I'd even say no, problems with NFS.  Especially after adding

DNF problems

Running Fedora 29, a fresh installation. When I run dnf check-update this is what I get : [root@localhost ~]# dnf check-update unitedrpms 29 - x86_64 133 kB/s | 1.0 MB 00:07 Fedora Modular 29 - x86_64 314 kB/s | 1.5 MB 00:04 Fedora Modular 29 - x86_64 - Updates 768 kB/s | 1.6 MB 00:0

Re: Changing mount options without restarting

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 20:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 12/1/18 7:55 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Without the '-f' it simply wouldn't unmount for me (it just sat there), > > so maybe your setup is different. Either way it's working now so thanks > > anyway. > > Good. > > I have had very l

Re: Trying to get gpt + software raid + LVM in kickstart

On 11/29/18 1:09 AM, Digimer wrote: zerombr clearpart --all --drives=/dev/vda,/dev/vdb ignoredisk --only-use=/dev/vda,/dev/vdb bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=/dev/vda,/dev/vdb --boot-drive=/dev/vda My first guess is that you're not specifying the disks to clearpart properly.  The docu

Re: night light mode

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, 8:15 AM Patrick Dupre > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:48:52PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Since I set the night light mode in manual, I cannot return to > > > automatic mode. > > > > > > How can I change this set up to default? > > > > In the Displays con

Re: night light mode

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018, 8:15 AM Patrick Dupre On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 07:48:52PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Since I set the night light mode in manual, I cannot return to > > automatic mode. > > > > How can I change this set up to default? > > In the

incomplete boot after Fc26-27 upgrade

My primary system was still running Fedora 26 and I'm in the process of updating stepwise using the dnf-system-upgrade plugin. The download and update to F27 seemed to go fine. But reboots fail and put me in "emergency/rescue" mode. Once I've logged in as root and su'ed to my personal account, I

Re: incomplete boot after Fc26-27 upgrade - quick update

An update. After several more attempted reboots changing the command line parameters failed, I logged in and found that several commands, notably "systemctl" failed with the message: Failed to connect to bus: No such file or directory What bus (dbus?) and why is it missing? jl On Sat, Dec 0

e-mail security.

Good afternoon, Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com". Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to view an encrypted message. Now I know that clicking links in e-mail is risky. How do I safely determine if this is genuine an

Re: e-mail security.

> El dic 1, 2018, a las 12:23 PM, home user via users > escribió: > > Good afternoon, > > Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com". > Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to > view an encrypted message. Now I know that clic

Re: e-mail security.

El dic 1, 2018, a las 12:37 PM, Ryan Cunningham escribió: > [. . .] and also file a complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission at > ftccomplaintassistant.gov [. . .] CORRECTION: You should instead file the complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov.

Re: e-mail security.

copy link and paste this link to Tor browser(if possible otherwise any browser in private window) and make sure link end with barracuda.com and there is a green lock on your browser address bar. Original Message On 2 Dec 2018, 1:53 AM, home user via users wrote: > Good afterno

Re: e-mail security.

Ryan, > Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination > URL ends in "barracuda.com". The link's destination URL starts with "https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";. The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string. I'm using Thunderbird on Fedora-28; there is no "anti-

Re: e-mail security.

On 12/1/18 12:51 PM, home user via users wrote: Ryan, > Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination > URL ends in "barracuda.com". The link's destination URL starts with "https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";. The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string. If

Re: e-mail security.

On 01Dec2018 13:23, home user wrote: Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com". Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to view an encrypted message. Now I know that clicking links in e-mail is risky. How do I safely determine

Re: e-mail security.

On 12/1/18 2:14 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: 4: Are you expecting an encrypted message from someone you've never heard of? I've never received one, and if I did I would expect it to be encrypted _to me_ i.e. GPG encrypted with _my_ public key. The key take here is that to retrieve it I don't have

Re: DNF problems

On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:08:45 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: > I would assume DNF would update the 6 files from rpm-fusion ?? Probably dependency errors. Try dnf update --best That should show you any package conflicts. ___ users mailing list -- users@li

Re: DNF problems

On 12/1/18 7:21 PM, stan wrote: On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:08:45 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: I would assume DNF would update the 6 files from rpm-fusion ?? Probably dependency errors. Try dnf update --best That should show you any package conflicts. I'll try that when I get back into

Re: e-mail security. [SOLVED]

I pasted the link into the Tor Browser. The only info I had to give was to set a password. Sometime last month, I used the web site for the Colorado consumer complaints office to ask where/how to file a federal complaint about national-brand canned food products sold in supermarkets being si

Re: e-mail security.

home user via users writes: Good afternoon, Today, I received a message claiming to be from "nore...@barracuda.com". Never heard of them. The message tells me to click a link in the message to view an encrypted message. Now I know that clicking links in e-mail is risky. How do I safel

Re: e-mail security.

home user via users writes: Ryan, > Please make sure that the domain name in the link's destination > URL ends in "barracuda.com". The link's destination URL starts with "https://encrypt.barracudanetworks.com/login?nid=";. The rest is a very long alpha-numeric string. How did you determine t

Re: e-mail security.

On 12/2/18 10:46 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I'll be happy to send you an HTML message with a link whose destination URL > seems to be > https://www.whitehouse.gov, but once clicked you'll wind up on > https://pornhub.com FWIW, with T-Bird it is easy to recognize this deception.  To see if what

Re: e-mail security. [SOLVED]

> finn: I used Tor in this case. But in retrospect, one thing I was > concerned about was the site downloading something malicious without me > knowing it. Would Tor have protected me against that? yep, Tor browser is harden enough to protect you from these kind of attack and provide better anon

Weird volume issues (PulseAudio?)

Okay, so this has been bugging me for a while now, but I'm not sure how to fix it, or to troubleshoot it further. Maybe somebody here can help. There are two issues, and they may or may not be related. I'm currently on F29, but it happened before I upgraded, too. 1. In gdm, the volume indicator a