On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:15:15 -0700, stan wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 16:24:49 + (UTC)
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 13:08:16 +0300, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>>
>> >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:30:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> >>> Does taking out "rhgb" from the boot command line
On 08/20/2018 02:10 AM, Robert Lu wrote:
Have you read
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/53fdbf714a80a2a19b6902122f85550feced7771/Casks/java.rb#L5-L8
?
Just read this. I see the information I needed. Thank you!
What exactly am I looking at?
_
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 15:15 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
> > (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
> > through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have
On 08/21/18 18:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager?
If you want a gui, then install nm-connection-editor. That lets you
add extra static addresses to an interface or wifi connection.
For the command line, use "ip addr".
ip addr add
On 22.08.2018 22:03, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Which looks like it's done what I think I want but the browser still
> does not connect to: http://192.168.11.1:0
>
> "This address is restricted
using tcp port 0 is usually wrong. AFAIK DD-WRT web interface is
listening on default port 80, so just remo
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
0.0.0.0
On 08/23/18 05:56, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
>> a VM, not relevant here):
>
> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>
> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my ca
On 08/22/2018 01:03 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/21/18 18:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the simplest way to do that with Fedora 27 or 28,NetworkManager?
>>
>> If you want a gui, then install nm-connection-editor. That lets you
>> add extra static addresses to an interface or wifi connec
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary modules have not been detected
In /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config, you must add ip_nat_ftp
On 08/22/2018 03:47 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
> and throws this error (written by me years ago):
>
>
> WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
> more necessary modules have not been detected
>
>
On 08/22/18 18:35, Rick Stevens wrote:
Of course it is. Port 0 is restricted. What you should FIRST do is:
ping 192.168.11.1
to see if you can hit the Buffalo device. If you can, then try to browse
the device. Use one of the following URLs (they are 100% equivalent):
http://192
On 08/22/2018 04:06 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/22/18 18:35, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Of course it is. Port 0 is restricted. What you should FIRST do is:
>>
>> ping 192.168.11.1
>>
>> to see if you can hit the Buffalo device. If you can, then try to browse
>> the device. Use one of the follow
On 08/22/2018 03:59 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/22/2018 03:47 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary mo
On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
> a VM, not relevant here):
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
No VPN
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ netstat -r
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
> and throws this error (written by me years ago):
>
>
> WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
> more necessary modules have not been detected
>
> In /
On 08/22/2018 04:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/23/18 06:47, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
My iptables firewall ported from RHEL won't connect to ftp sites
and throws this error (written by me years ago):
WARNING: active FTP rules have been selected but one or
more necessary modules h
On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
well. What's wrong with the route command other than it is deprecated
On 08/22/2018 04:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing tabl
On 08/23/18 09:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>>
>> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
>
> The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
> well.
> What's wron
20 matches
Mail list logo
