hi guys...
and if there is such a g/cpu does then Fedora take advantage of it?
thanks, L.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfed
Hi.
Been reviewing/looking over various sysadmin related vids/sites for
setting up a complete test website.
I'm trying to find a "remote" sysadmin resource that I can talk
to/work with for a small project to setup/run a test website that's
publicly accessible.
Looking to :
-setup up basic/test s
Dear all,
I just noticed a very weird problem on my workstation. Although the
machine has 64 GB of RAM installed,
$ head -n 1 /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:2400748 kB
that is, only a few gigabytes are actually available.
Unfortunately I don't have physical access to the machine, which is a
On Thu, 2018-06-21 at 19:05 +0300, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> I just noticed a very weird problem on my workstation. Although the
> machine has 64 GB of RAM installed,
>
> $ head -n 1 /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:2400748 kB
>
> that is, only a few gigabytes are actually availabl
On 06/21/2018 09:05 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> I just noticed a very weird problem on my workstation. Although the
> machine has 64 GB of RAM installed,
>
> $ head -n 1 /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 2400748 kB
>
> that is, only a few gigabytes are actually available.
>
> Unfo
On 06/21/2018 07:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> AFAIK Fedora uses the available RAM as a) buffer space, and b) the /tmp
> filesystem.
>
> BTW a slightly more user-friendly way to get that info is with the
> free(1) command.
The joke is, the >60GB of missing memory doesn't even show up in fre
On 06/21/2018 09:05 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Does anyone have any idea of what could be going on?
Running free -h will give you a better idea of how it's being used.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:05:16PM +0300, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> I just noticed a very weird problem on my workstation. Although the
> machine has 64 GB of RAM installed,
> $ head -n 1 /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:2400748 kB
> that is, only a few gigabytes are actually available.
> Unfortunately
You didn't install a 32 bit version of fedora did you?
With no more PAE kernels being provided the only way to
get to big memory is with a 64 bit kernel.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@l
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 02:41:32PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> You didn't install a 32 bit version of fedora did you?
> With no more PAE kernels being provided the only way to
> get to big memory is with a 64 bit kernel.
From the original post, looks like 64 bit:
"I am running an up-to-date Fedora
On 06/21/2018 11:13 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On 06/21/2018 07:51 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> AFAIK Fedora uses the available RAM as a) buffer space, and b) the /tmp
>> filesystem.
>>
>> BTW a slightly more user-friendly way to get that info is with the
>> free(1) command.
>
> The joke is, t
Bonjour,
I just added a crypted partition on my laptop (/home ans swap are
crypted and until now no problem had occured with them) and this new
partition is not mounted at boot, it is only to be mounted by user on
demand.
The whole install of this partition, went without any problems: it could
be
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:18:03 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> So what can I do to have a NORMAL boot?
I use this insanity on my system:
http://tomhorsley.com/game/punch.html
You would probably need to add the appropriate
command to unmount the encrypted partition to
the script run on the reboot co
On 06/22/2018 12:00 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 06/21/2018 11:13 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
Update: I upgraded from Fedora 27 to Fedora 28, and the same issue
persists. Of course, the kernel is almost the same.
This has to be some weird kernel / BIOS bug...
Can you send us the content of /proc/c
On 06/21/2018 03:24 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> On 06/22/2018 12:00 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 06/21/2018 11:13 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
>>> Update: I upgraded from Fedora 27 to Fedora 28, and the same issue
>>> persists. Of course, the kernel is almost the same.
>>>
>>> This has to be some weird k
15 matches
Mail list logo
