Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off
the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed
release date.
Anyone know if an official announcement will be made here? If not,
where are official announcements made?
___
On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 11:52 +0100, Danny Horne via users wrote:
> Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off
> the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed
> release date.
>
> Anyone know if an official announcement will be made here? If not,
> wh
On 01/05/18 12:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On the Announce list, and usually copied here as well.
> poc
> ___
>
Thanks
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 05/01/18 18:52, Danny Horne via users wrote:
> Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off
> the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed
> release date.
>
> Anyone know if an official announcement will be made here? If not,
> where are official
On 01/05/18 14:48, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Or, just look at https://getfedora.org/ and see.
> Fedora 28 released! Get it now
>
>
The software updater on Workstation has picked up on the new version,
laptop updated, just waiting for the PC, then three servers to upgrade
___
On 05/01/2018 09:48 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/01/18 18:52, Danny Horne via users wrote:
Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off
the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed
release date.
Anyone know if an official announcement will be made
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 05/01/2018 09:48 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/18 18:52, Danny Horne via users wrote:
>>
>>> Just checked the release schedule, and target #1 has been crossed off
>>> the list, meaning (by my understanding) that today is the confirmed
>>
On 01/05/18 16:47, Charlie Dennett wrote:
> and the Fedora wiki page for dnf system upgrade still has 27 as the
> most recent stable release.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
>
> I've upgraded using that method for the last several releases and not
> had any issues.
>
> --
>
Danny Horne via users wrote:
> I'm sure I saw in the list that OpenSSL would be upgraded to
> 1.1.1, mine still shows as 1.1.0
f28 currently includes openssl-1.1.0h-3.fc28
-- Rex
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
When updating by dnf to F28, process fails saying that nss-pem has an
inferior architecture (I have both i686 and 64 packages). Any idea??
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproj
this is the full output
dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=28
Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running
"dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y
Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:00:00 fa il mar 01 mag 2018
20:24:38 CEST.
postfix still have problems with Systemd?
On 05/01/2018 06:51 PM, Danny Horne via users wrote:
> On 01/05/18 16:47, Charlie Dennett wrote:
>> and the Fedora wiki page for dnf system upgrade still has 27 as the
>> most recent stable release.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
On 01/05/18 18:10, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Danny Horne via users wrote:
>
>> I'm sure I saw in the list that OpenSSL would be upgraded to
>> 1.1.1, mine still shows as 1.1.0
> f28 currently includes openssl-1.1.0h-3.fc28
>
> -- Rex
>
Sorry, misread what I saw
2018-05-01T14:51:42Z DEBUG ---> Package op
Read this Antonio: https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-27-fedora-28/
"If you have issues when upgrading because of packages without updates,
broken dependencies, or retired packages, add the *‐‐allowerasing* flag
when typing the above command. This will allow DNF to remove packages that
ma
On 2018-05-01 15:02, john q wrote:
> Read this Antonio: https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-27-fedora-28/
>
> "If you have issues when upgrading because of packages without updates,
> broken dependencies, or retired packages, add the _‐‐allowerasing_ flag when
> typing the above command
Finally, in the latter part of last week, I got Thunderbird 52.7, which
has the fix to bug 1447360 (and other related bugs). It never did show
up in the Fedora 26 repository; I got it when I upgraded to Fedora 27.
I've been using Thunderbird 52.7 for several days now. I no longer see
the "CL
after updating f27 to F28, I note that gnome-terminal doesn't start on my
two systems. I had to install tilix to have a working terminal
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 27(Workstation)
da/from Gmail
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.or
I used the --allowerasing flag and it worked on my systems. Tnx evrybody
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 27(Workstation)
da/from Gmail
2018-05-01 21:25 GMT+02:00 Jeffrey Ross :
>
>
>
>
> On 2018-05-01 15:02, john q wrote:
>
> Read this Antonio: https://fedoramagazine.org/
> upgrading-fedora-27-
I updated both my systems:
I note that some menus are in english (activities instead of attivita' -
italian) Poweroff instead of spegni, and the sytems ask me to change name
of some folders...(that I denied)
What is the component to blame??
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 28 Workstation
da/from
Claws-Mail doesn't start on FC28 because it can't find libnsl.so.1. A softlink
to
libnsl.so.2 fixes the issue.
--
Venlig hilsen,
Erik P. Olsen
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedo
another example is date: today it is mercoledì in Italy not Wednesday :-)
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 28 Workstation
da/from Gmail
2018-05-02 8:13 GMT+02:00 Antonio M :
> I updated both my systems:
>
> I note that some menus are in english (activities instead of attivita' -
> italian) Powe
21 matches
Mail list logo
