Allegedly, on or about 13 December 2017, Antonio M sent:
> Suddenly after last updates any usb stick is only real on my sistems
> but I can access them from terminal (writing is allowed) .Any idea??
Have you rebooted since the update?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 4.13.16-202.fc26.x86
Thank you all,
I have both access_log and ssl_access_log.
I hoped for an easy solution but it's clear that it is not such thing.
I will switch to only https.
C.S.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, wwp wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:12:04 + (GMT) Michael Young
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Ted Roche wrote:
> >
> > > Booted into Windows 10 to start the annual TurboTax stuff, and it
> > > asked to do an update, as usual. It turned out
On 12Dec2017 12:11, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/12/2017 09:09 AM, Charlie Dennett wrote:
I have a small web server and user webalizer. I recently converted to
all https. You say you "added" the ssl access log. That makes me think
you have two log files defined in your webalizer.conf file. Fro
software-updates just upgraded 82 packages. On reboot, immediate kernel
panic.
4.13.16-202 is running ok.
yumex-dnf shows two instances of the new kernel packages ??
nvidia 387.22
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:40:14 -0500
"Wells, Roger K." wrote:
> I have existing systems with un-encrypted disks.
> I have tried unsuccessfully to encrypt them using LUKS.
> Has anyone out there been able to encrypt an existing system (after
> the fact, so to speak)?
I have found some ideas of how
Tim, you are right: after reboot anything worked again.
I apologize for the delay in answering but your email was sent to Spam,
shame on Gmail :-)
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 27(Workstation)
da/from Gmail
2017-12-13 9:03 GMT+01:00 Tim :
> Allegedly, on or about 13 December 2017, Antonio M
Probably in connection with some version of yumex, I have somehow
gotten both */fc26.i686 and */fc26.x86_64 forms of a dozen or so rpms for
compiz.
This has not been a problem till now. fc26 (and, unless I'm
misremembering, fc25 and fc24 before that) has just ignored the
supe
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> Probably in connection with some version of yumex, I have somehow
> gotten both */fc26.i686 and */fc26.x86_64 forms of a dozen or so rpms for
> compiz.
>
> This has not been a problem till now. fc26 (and, unless I'm
> misrememb
On 12/13/2017 12:46 PM, Beartooth wrote:
Probably in connection with some version of yumex, I have somehow
gotten both */fc26.i686 and */fc26.x86_64 forms of a dozen or so rpms for
compiz.
Do you have "wine" installed? That's a typical reason for bringing in
the 32-bit libs.
10 matches
Mail list logo