nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread Jeandet Alexis
Hello, In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods. - On my desktop I have a i7-6700K with an integrated GPU plus a GTX 1050 Ti -> kernel/akmod updates works great - On a second destop we have a i7-6950X without integrated GPU plus a GeForce GTX 1050 -> akmod always fail we have to re

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/11/17 14:56, Jeandet Alexis wrote: > In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods. > > - On my desktop I have a i7-6700K with an integrated GPU plus a GTX 1050 Ti -> > kernel/akmod updates works great > - On a second destop we have a i7-6950X without integrated GPU plus a GeForce

Are you sure it's only the browser? Was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On 2017-10-10 23:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i am beyond frustrated with how mind-bendingly slow as a dog is firefox on my fully-updated F26 system. eg, i go on twitter, want to just post a tweet, sometimes takes several *seconds* just to finally get around to responding to keyboard strokes. He

OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On 2017-10-11 00:20, stan wrote: I'm running the latest firefox from the repositories, and I would characterize the response as 'snappy'. Some possibilities: Your configuration is allowing a lot of third party communication to slow down page loading. Typically pages load ads before content, a

Re: OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread wwp
Hello M., On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:48:08 +0200 "M. Fioretti" wrote: > On 2017-10-11 00:20, stan wrote: > > > I'm running the latest firefox from the repositories, and I would > > characterize the response as 'snappy'. > > > Some possibilities: > > > Your configuration is allowing a lot of thir

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Jonny Heggheim
On 10/10/2017 11:07 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i am beyond frustrated with how mind-bendingly slow as a dog is > firefox on my fully-updated F26 system. eg, i go on twitter, want to > just post a tweet, sometimes takes several *seconds* just to finally > get around to responding to keyboard st

Re: Are you sure it's only the browser? Was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Alessio Ciregia
On Oct 11, 2017 09:46, "M. Fioretti" wrote: I solved the problem brilliantly by... switching (also for other reasons) to Ubuntu 16.04LTS. Not 100% good, but much, much, much better from the point of view of this post. My highly unscientific opinion is that there is something in the F25 COMBINED,

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 11 October 2017 at 06:12, Robert Lu wrote: > Hi, I think there is some reason: > > 1. your connection is very slow. > you can try to test your network speed, such as fast.com > > 2. your firefox have internal bug. > well, you can open developer tools, and watch the request timing tab. it can >

Re: F26, Missing icons in Dolphin

2017-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 22:13 -0600, InvalidPath wrote: > So about 2 months ago I upgraded my work laptop and my home workstation > from F25 to 26. The laptop rolled great.. teh desktop however lost all > desktop and dolphin icons except for specials like for Ansible, SpiderOak, > Steam, etc. > I've

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Germano Corrêa
I'm a regular Firefox and Fedora user, and I use stable firefox from fedora's repo and the nightly, both are running fast here. Once, like 2 versions ago, firefox used to be very slow, but that's not a problem now. Em qua, 11 de out de 2017 às 06:44, Ahmad Samir escreveu: > On 11 October 2017 at

Re: Calligra flow 3.0.1-6 - missing from Fedora 26

2017-10-11 Thread Earl Ramirez
> It seems there is no longer a calligra-flow package available. I'm > not > familiar with calligra, but is it possible that the functionality was > moved into the core package if the subpackage was empty? The > documentation should tell you that. > > * Wed Jul 12 2017 Rex Dieter - 3.0.1-6 - >

Re: Calligra flow 3.0.1-6 - missing from Fedora 26

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/11/17 18:58, Earl Ramirez wrote: >> It seems there is no longer a calligra-flow package available. I'm >> not >> familiar with calligra, but is it possible that the functionality was >> moved into the core package if the subpackage was empty? The >> documentation should tell you that. >> >>

kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
I installed the above kernel this morning and immediately experienced very noticeable delays in accessing websites (2 or 3 seconds each time), apparently caused by slow DNS lookups. The same happened when running a 'ping' from the Shell, so I don't think the browser (Chrome) is to blame. Rebootin

Re: error in clamav running clamscan as root from /.

2017-10-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:58:47 -0700, stan wrote: > For what it's worth, I also have that file on my system with the same > permissions. I think these files are created by the ebtables program. /sys is a "sysfs" mount created at runtime. ___ users mailin

Re: kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/11/17 20:26, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I installed the above kernel this morning and immediately experienced > very noticeable delays in accessing websites (2 or 3 seconds each > time), apparently caused by slow DNS lookups. The same happened when > running a 'ping' from the Shell, so I do

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread jeandet
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 15:14 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit : > On 10/11/17 14:56, Jeandet Alexis wrote: > > In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods. > > > > - On my desktop I have a i7-6700K with an integrated GPU plus a GTX > > 1050 Ti -> > > kernel/akmod updates works great >

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/11/17 21:28, jeandet wrote: > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 15:14 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit : >> On 10/11/17 14:56, Jeandet Alexis wrote: >>> In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods. >>> >>> - On my desktop I have a i7-6700K with an integrated GPU plus a GTX 1050 Ti >>> -> >>

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread jeandet
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 21:32 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit : > On 10/11/17 21:28, jeandet wrote: > > Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 15:14 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit : > > > On 10/11/17 14:56, Jeandet Alexis wrote: > > > > In my lab we have a "funny" beaviour with nvidia akmods. > > > > > > > > -

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:07:54PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i am beyond frustrated with how mind-bendingly slow as a dog is > firefox on my fully-updated F26 system. eg, i go on twitter, want to > just post a tweet, sometimes takes several *seconds* just to finally > get around to respond

Re: Calligra flow 3.0.1-6 - missing from Fedora 26

2017-10-11 Thread Earl Ramirez
> > FWIW, if you hover on the screenshot it is from version 2.4. > > If you download the source code for calligra and go into the "flow" > directory they > talk about "Kivio" and not calligra-flow. So, is it possible that > "flow" has been > superseded by > > koffice-kivio-3:1.6.3-47.fc26.x86_

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/11/17 21:57, jeandet wrote: > Not by myself and tracer isn't installed. I didn't find how to check if > this plugin is enabled or not. The plugins are either of these 2 packages depending on the version of dnf you're running python2-dnf-plugin-tracer.noarch python3-dnf-plugin-tracer.

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Germano Massullo
1) If you use AdBlock replace it with UBlock Origin. 2) Increase the amount of processes used by Firefox ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: nvidia akmod on several Intel desktops

2017-10-11 Thread jeandet
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 à 22:03 +0800, Ed Greshko a écrit : > On 10/11/17 21:57, jeandet wrote: > > Not by myself and tracer isn't installed. I didn't find how to > > check if > > this plugin is enabled or not. > > > The plugins are either of these 2 packages depending on the version > of dnf

Re: EXTERNAL: This morning's update & bluetooth

2017-10-11 Thread Frank Elsner
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:10:11 -0400 Wells, Roger K. wrote: [ Bluetooth problem not cited ] > Also just discovered: > Network drives (cifs) that were in use are no longer mountable on the > 4.13.4-200 kernel. > Reverting back to 4.12.14-300 and all is well again. Problem still exists with 4.13.5-

Communication between Topfield PVR and Fedora 26 ?

2017-10-11 Thread Ger van Dijck
Hi all, Question : I have a Topfield 5000 PVR Satallite Reciever equiped with a 160 mB hard disk. Is there a posibillity to communicate between the contains of the HD (movies etc.) and Fedora 26 ? Kind Regards, Ger van Dijck. ___

Re: OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread stan
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:48:08 +0200 "M. Fioretti" wrote: > from what I read at https://adnauseam.io/, AdNauseam does something > else, and its purpose has nothing to do with performance. It DOES > download > the ads, specifically to "click" on them. Why do you say that it > could make > Firefox f

Re: OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On 2017-10-11 17:26, stan wrote: ... I have noscript and privacy badger installed, though, and they block content that would come from ad servers. So, it is possible that adnauseum functions as you think, and I am just not seeing the effect because of these other plugins. ah, OK. This makes a

Re: OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread katnip
stan: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:48:08 +0200 > "M. Fioretti" wrote: > >> from what I read at https://adnauseam.io/, AdNauseam does something >> else, and its purpose has nothing to do with performance. It DOES >> download >> the ads, specifically to "click" on them. Why do you say that it >> could

Re: kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 21:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/11/17 20:26, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I installed the above kernel this morning and immediately experienced > > very noticeable delays in accessing websites (2 or 3 seconds each > > time), apparently caused by slow DNS lookups. The

Re: OT: why would AdNauseam make Firefox faster?, was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread stan
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:48:08 +0200 "M. Fioretti" wrote: > from what I read at https://adnauseam.io/, AdNauseam does something > else, and its purpose has nothing to do with performance. It DOES > download > the ads, specifically to "click" on them. Why do you say that it > could make > Firefox f

Re: kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/12/17 00:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 21:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 10/11/17 20:26, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> I installed the above kernel this morning and immediately experienced >>> very noticeable delays in accessing websites (2 or 3 seconds each >>> t

Re: kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 05:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/12/17 00:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 21:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 10/11/17 20:26, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > I installed the above kernel this morning and immediately experienced > > > > ver

Re: Are you sure it's only the browser? Was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Doug
On 10/11/2017 02:44 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: On 2017-10-10 23:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i am beyond frustrated with how mind-bendingly slow as a dog is firefox on my fully-updated F26 system. eg, i go on twitter, want to just post a tweet, sometimes takes several *seconds* just to finally get a

Re: kernel-4.13.5-200.fc26.x86_64 DNS slowdown?

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/12/17 06:08, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I know what DDNS is. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm not using > DDNS at present though I have done in the past. The router has a > control panel for configuring *its own* DNS resolver, i.e. where it > forwards queries to upstream. It was set t

Re: F26, Missing icons in Dolphin

2017-10-11 Thread InvalidPath
Thanks Ed.. Last night I switched from papirus-adapta-nokto to regular old papirus (according to Icon theme). And what's more, I have no icons in System Settings either. So, long story short, yeah I've tried numerous themes and all end up doing the same. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Ed Gresh

Re: F26, Missing icons in Dolphin

2017-10-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/12/17 10:42, InvalidPath wrote: > Thanks Ed.. Last night I switched from papirus-adapta-nokto to regular old > papirus > (according to Icon theme). And what's more, I have no icons in System Settings > either.  So, long story short, yeah I've tried numerous themes and all end up > doing > t

Re: Are you sure it's only the browser? Was: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread M. Fioretti
On 2017-10-12 00:43, Doug wrote: On 10/11/2017 02:44 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: ... I had EXACTLY, exactly the same problem on a fully updated F25 system, a couple of weeks ago. Unbearable. But in my case even libreoffice and kate were very slow. I solved the problem brilliantly by... switching (

Re: why is firefox so &*^$#&^$^#$*&_*()&) SLOW!?!?

2017-10-11 Thread Shuichiro MAKIGAKI
Or disable IPv6 on all interfaces. NetworkManager should handle it, but sorry I don't know how to. Regards, Makkie 2017/10/11 23:15、Germano Massullo のメール: 1) If you use AdBlock replace it with UBlock Origin. 2) Increase the amount of processes used by Firefox