===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12
Hello,
Here is my current thinking.
2 days ago, I received a brand new UBS key (Lexar S75).
I inserted it inside the UBS port of my Linux machine.
I open the key (it mounted automatically) and read the instructions
about the encryption coming with the key (by opening a file).
I did not pay too muc
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for those who love razorsharp fonts just like me but got the new v40
> interpreter coming with freetype-2.7 enforced on them when installing F26:
> the good old v35 interpreter is still there (and I hope it will be
> forever). You can use it by setting the environment
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:09:02 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> where are you setting this?
If you aren't using wayland, session-wide environment variables can be
set in scripts added to the /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ directory.
I have no idea where to do something similar in wayland.
___
Hello,
TRying to recover one of the disk;
I now have
Disk /dev/sdc: 76.3 GiB, 81964302336 bytes, 160086528 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0
Starting acroread, it just silently exits.
AdobeReader_enu-9.5.5-1.i486
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/14/17 21:36, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> TRying to recover one of the disk;
> I now have
>
> Disk /dev/sdc: 76.3 GiB, 81964302336 bytes, 160086528 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 b
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:12 -0500, SternData wrote:
> At least, so far, it went perfectly. Thank you.
Not here:
So buggy that meantime I simply don't even have the time any more for
the bug reports to write:
Xorg seems broken:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470845
As to the latter
Hello,
How did you install it?
Cheers,
Sylvia
On 14 July 2017 at 16:09, Neal Becker wrote:
> Starting acroread, it just silently exits.
> AdobeReader_enu-9.5.5-1.i486
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:12 -0500, SternData wrote:
>> At least, so far, it went perfectly. Thank you.
>
> Not here:
>
> So buggy that meantime I simply don't even have the time any more for
> the bug reports to write:
>
> Xorg seems brok
On 07/14/17 22:09, Neal Becker wrote:
> Starting acroread, it just silently exits.
> AdobeReader_enu-9.5.5-1.i486
Yep, sounds like that is something you need to report to the Adobe folks. I'd
not
used it in quite some time since I've been mainly using okular. But now that
I've
tried it again
On 07/14/17 22:27, Paul Smith wrote:
> Yes, F26 is buggy:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469789
Seems like a problem only if one is using thunar. I'm not having any problems
with
USB disks on F26 and a KDE desktop.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470293
Sounds
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 13:22:50 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> 2 days ago, I received a brand new UBS key (Lexar S75).
> I inserted it inside the UBS port of my Linux machine.
> I open the key (it mounted automatically) and read the instructions
> about the encryption coming with the key (by opening
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:08:04 +0200
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 13.07.2017, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
>
> > Will give that a try. Thanks for the tip.
>
> In addition, to get really sharp fonts, you'll have to delete the
> slight hinting set as default in /etc/fonts/conf.d and enable full
> hinting.
Hello,
I have been getting these messages on my system every second after upgrading
from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop.
We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64
crashed.
I already have 1000 of reports that I can't submit. How do I resolve it.
_
Thank,
However, how could I have destroy the partition table of 3 disks
using gparted only?
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Un
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:59:54 -0700
stan wrote:
> I'm using freetype-freeworld from rpmfusion. I followed your
> original links, and ended up here,
> https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/subpixel-hinting.html
> where I see a comparison between 35 and 40. My fonts look like the 35
> version.
On 14 July 2017 at 15:28, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:09:02 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> where are you setting this?
>
> If you aren't using wayland, session-wide environment variables can be
> set in scripts added to the /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ directory.
>
> I have no idea w
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:22:13 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> However, how could I have destroy the partition table of 3 disks
> using gparted only?
It is certainly possible to destroy the partition table of 3 disks
with gparted. I can't say how you would have done it, or even if you
did. I only
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 15:19:41 -
"Sudhir Khanger" wrote:
> I have been getting these messages on my system every second after
> upgrading from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop.
>
> We're sorry, it looks like
> BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 crashed.
>
> I already have 10
OK,
Now, what would you do with this
When I try to mount this partition:
/dev/sdd6 317001728 405065727 8806400042G 83 Linux
(>L Linux19732 113 30 25214 44 46 88064000 [Backup])
The size is OK
But:
mount /dev/sdd6 /mnt/tmp
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblo
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TRying to recover one of the disk;
> I now have
>
> Disk /dev/sdc: 76.3 GiB, 81964302336 bytes, 160086528 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/o
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 18:01:16 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Now, what would you do with this
> When I try to mount this partition:
> /dev/sdd6 317001728 405065727 8806400042G 83 Linux
> (>L Linux19732 113 30 25214 44 46 88064000
> [Backup]) The size is OK
> But:
> mo
On 07/14/2017 08:19 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
I have been getting these messages on my system every second after upgrading
from Fedora 25 to Fedora 26 Plasma Desktop.
We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64
crashed.
I already have 1000 of reports that I can'
On 07/14/2017 10:16 AM, stan wrote:
e2fsck -c -v /dev/sdd6
which is verbose and read only, so it should be faster. It doesn't
make any changes to the disk. The disk is already unmounted, which is
what you want when doing these diagnostics and repairs.
Did you get the wrong parameter? -c is
On 07/14/2017 09:01 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
When I try to mount this partition:
/dev/sdd6 317001728 405065727 8806400042G 83 Linux
(>L Linux19732 113 30 25214 44 46 88064000 [Backup])
The size is OK
But:
mount /dev/sdd6 /mnt/tmp
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad
On 07/14/2017 04:22 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I just changed the size of the
first partition and I added a ext4 partition.
Did you unmount the drive before doing these changes? gparted won't let
you modify a partition that is mounted. You say you changed the size of
the first partition, was
On 07/14/2017 06:36 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Disk /dev/sdc: 76.3 GiB, 81964302336 bytes, 160086528 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x
Hello,
Thank,
THis is the result of gpart (no -f)
My problem is to guess where was the extended partition.
In addition there was a swap partition is sdd5
Begin scan...
Possible partition(Windows NT/W2K FS), size(13mb), offset(6696mb)
Possible extended partition at offset(10106mb)
Possible pa
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 22:39 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/14/17 22:27, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Yes, F26 is buggy:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469789
>
> Seems like a problem only if one is using thunar. I'm not having any
> problems with
> USB disks on F26 and a KDE des
Hello,
I more or less recover one disk.
I can boot from supergrub2, but not directly.
It seems that I cannot write the MBR properly.
(grub2-install /dev/sda)
Disk /dev/sda: 76.3 GiB, 81964302336 bytes, 160086528 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 by
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:17:09 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Did you get the wrong parameter? -c is for checking for bad blocks,
> -n is to do a readonly check.
No, I jumped ahead and suspected that there is something wrong with the
disks. If all Patrick did is what he said he did, like you, I don
On 07/13/2017 12:04 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
You didn't let it do the reboot to do the upgrade?
.
Not yet, I can't risk running up a lot of usage during "prime time."
If I go over my allotment Viasat protests and charges me by for extra
gigs.
The post-reboot part of the process doesn't dow
On 07/14/17 17:46, Gordon Messmer wrote:
You didn't let it do the reboot to
do the upgrade?
.
Not yet, I can't risk running up a
lot of usage during "prime time." If
I go over my allotment Viasat
protests and charges me by for extra
gigs.
The post-reboot part of the process
doesn't
On 07/14/2017 03:01 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I clicked on Download this morning during my "free time" which is not
charged against my usage and it just downloaded all the stuff again
and when the install was done it simply said the install failed with
some meaningless gobbledygook about a gedit f
On 07/14/2017 03:01 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 07/14/17 17:46, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>
You didn't let it do the reboot to do the upgrade?
>>> .
>>> Not yet, I can't risk running up a lot of usage during "prime time."
>>> If I go over my allotment Viasat protests and charges me by for
Hello,
To get the backup of partition table
I need to mount
/dev/VolGrpSys1/root
ACTIVE'/dev/VolGrpSys1/root' [39.35 GiB] inherit
but I get:
mount /dev/VolGrpSys1/root /mnt/backup/
mount: /dev/mapper/VolGrpSys1-root is already mounted or /mnt/backup busy
fsck from util-linux 2.28.
On 07/14/17 18:21, Gordon Messmer wrote:
rpm errors are fairly specific, and
I've never seen one that was
meaningless. There are plenty of
people here, willing to help you out,
but we can't fix your problems for
you. You have to participate. If
there's an error, write it down.
+
Yes,
OK,
I got my previous table.
Disk /dev/sdb: 232.9 GiB, 250059350016 bytes, 488397168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x000ee491
Device Bo
On 07/14/2017 03:50 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Yes, I can deal with rpm errors in a terminal, but this process is all
done with a gui. I did snap an iPhone picture of the error message, but
I don't think anyone can make much sense from it. I simply says there is
an error between a gedit file and st
On 07/14/2017 03:22 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
If you have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of gedit installed, try
uninstalling the out-of-arch version (e.g. uninstall the i686 version
if you're on a 64-bit machine).
I was going to say that situation would be very hard to get into, but
then I c
You could try updating gedit before you upgrade the system to Fedora 26. Here's
what I did to upgrade iftop:
rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-$(uname -i)
dnf --releasever=25 update iftop
If the update doesn't bring in a bazillion files, then you should let it
finish. You
ma
Arrg, forgot to say change 25 to 26 and iftop to gedit.
Bill
On 7/14/2017 8:20 PM, Bill Shirley wrote:
You could try updating gedit before you upgrade the system to Fedora 26. Here's
what I did to upgrade iftop:
rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-$(uname -i)
dnf --releasever=
On 07/15/17 06:22, Rick Stevens wrote:
> If you have both the i686 and x86_64 versions of gedit installed, try
> uninstalling the out-of-arch version (e.g. uninstall the i686 version
> if you're on a 64-bit machine).
Getting both versions of gedit installed would have been a "difficult" thing to
On 07/14/2017 04:12 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I got my previous table.
Disk /dev/sdb: 232.9 GiB, 250059350016 bytes, 488397168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I just installed 4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64. And the problem continues.
I am getting the following messages every second.
We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64
crashed. Please contact the developer if you want to report the issue.
We
On 07/14/2017 09:18 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
I am getting the following messages every second.
We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64
crashed. Please contact the developer if you want to report the issue.
We're sorry, it looks like BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4
Hi,
I have just rebuilt the boot images after running the following command.
dracut --regenerate-all --force
Let's see how long it works. I have 6000+ unreportable errors in the ABRT
window.
Still no luck.
Jul 15 10:35:05 workstation abrt-dump-journal-oops[1256]: Reported 2 kernel
oopses to
I have managed to hose something in my account.
In Fedora 24 about 2/3 of the time when I login the only item in
Computer was "File System" and inserted media (CD/USB) neither mounts or
appears. The other 1/3 of the time it worked. Not good. But the clock
is ticking on F24 now so I updated to
Sudhir Khanger wrote:
>Jul 15 10:35:05 workstation abrt-dump-journal-oops[1256]: Reported 2 kernel
>oopses to Abrt
>Jul 15 10:35:06 workstation abrt-server[5959]: Can't find a meaningful
>backtrace for hashing in '.'
>Jul 15 10:35:06 workstation abrt-server[5959]: Option
>'DropNotReportableOopse
50 matches
Mail list logo
